Obama Promises Agressive Growth…In Government

The all the applause Obama has gotten for appointing a “moderate” economic team (I’m still convinced that the moderates in Obama’s administration are simply stage dressing meant to distract from his “Jimmy Carter’s second term” policies), the guy just doesn’t get what’s wrong with this economy and how we can fix it.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President-elect Barack Obama said on Saturday his plan to create at least 2.5 million new jobs included the largest infrastructure investment since the 1950s and a huge effort to reduce U.S. government energy use.
The United States will also make a big push to expand access to high-speed Internet and modernize school buildings across the country, he said.
“We need action — and action now,” Obama said in the Democratic Party’s weekly radio address, one day after government data showed U.S. employers had axed 533,000 jobs in November, the most in 34 years.

“First, we will launch a massive effort to make public buildings more energy-efficient. Our government now pays the highest energy bill in the world,” Obama says. I’m actually all for that. But his promise to create 2.5 million jobs through the massive expansion of government spending is foolhardy.
Government spending doesn’t create jobs because, by necessity, all the money government spends is first taken from we citizens. The government spending that money means we cannot spend it. At best the government can only create the same number of jobs as would have been created had that money stayed in the pockets of taxpayers. And that’s unlikely because a) the government takes a chunk of the money it collects for administration and b) the government never spends as efficiently as individual citizens do in general.
Unless Obama is planning on a ton of deficit spending that will be fueled not by tax dollars but by money borrowed from other sources, his spending initiatives aren’t going to accomplish much of anything.
What I find amazing is that Obama actually talks about employers who are laying off workers, and then says he’s going to fix that problem by…building more roads? And refurbishing schools? Roads are great, and I actually think we do need to look at investing some tax dollars in our infrastructure, but that’s not going to fix unemployment. That’s not going to fix the reason why these employers are letting employees go.
If Obama wanted to fix that problem he’d be talking about putting more money in the pockets of these business owners, and the people that patronize the businesses they own, through tax cuts. At a time when the people who pay the most taxes in this country (business owners) are feeling the pinch and cutting costs we shouldn’t be looking to burden them with more taxes (or even just keeping the existing tax rates high). We should be looking to ease those burdens.
Unless, again, Obama is planning deficit spending. But that’s problematic for a whole raft of other reasons.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://Array robert108

    He also threatened those who received this latest taxpayer ripoff who didn’t use it the way he dictated. He threatened to “take it away”. Wow! That’s incentive. /sarcasm

  • robert108

    Again, I am not an Obama supporter, but what
    you say is complete BS.

    Actually, I’m going by what he said: “The Constitution is a flawed document.” His words convict him, along with all his Marxist/Muslim upbringing. He thinks there are 57 States in the USA. There are 57 Islamic states. The BS is all yours.

  • http://norseberserker.blogspot.com/ Rugby Reader

    Very well. I shall just call you clueless.

  • robert108

    I follow the Constitution, the founding principles, individual independence and the four freedoms: personal, economic, religious and political. Barack Hussein Obama supports none of that. You figure it out, if you can.

  • http://norseberserker.blogspot.com/ Rugby Reader

    Those who believe in GWB are brainwashed idiots.

    Good luck…

  • http://norseberserker.blogspot.com/ Rugby Reader

    Republicans, Democrats, yes, they are all the same. They both support the status quo. They both put corporate interests ahead of the American people. They both lie. They both support Bush’s phony war of terror. They both desire to perpetuate the illegal, immoral, unjustified, unconstitutional, and unnecessary invasion and occupation of Iraq.

    I voted for Ralph Nader.

  • http://norseberserker.blogspot.com/ Rugby Reader

    Just like Bush! They are all the same.

  • robert108

    I voted for Ralph Nader.

    Birds of a feather…

  • http://norseberserker.blogspot.com/ Rugby Reader

    So where does that leave you? You must be an Obama supporter.

  • http://norseberserker.blogspot.com/ Rugby Reader

    A “Constitutional Lawyer” follows none of that. Yeah, right. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid, dude. Again, I am not an Obama supporter, but what you say is complete BS.

  • Ivan Micheal

    Those who believe in GWB are brainwashed idiots…….I completely reckon on that :-)

    ——————————————————————
    http://www.makemoneykingdom.com
    http://www.forexfreedownload.com
    http://www.bobsbanter.com

    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

  • http://norseberserker.blogspot.com/ Rugby Reader

    You doubt what?

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Rugrat: Are you going to spam your BDS on every post on this blog?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Just like Bush! They are all the same.

    I’ll not defend Bush’s record on growing the size of government, but they are not “all the same.”

    That’s the sort of thing ignorant people who want to appear to be knowledgeable about politics without actually taking the time to be knowledgeable say.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    You can call me whatever you want. But I have a guiding philosophy, I’m consistent in applying it, and I know why I support or oppose the people I support or oppose.

    I’m not some poseur guided by emotion and whoever I think sounds the coolest.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I doubt you voted for Ralph Nader. The other day you were talking about how you’re an Al Franken supporter, now you’re all “both parties suck.”

    You’re ill-informed is what I think

    I mean, maybe you did vote for Nader, but I’ll bet you did it as some sort of statement rather than an informed choice. Clearly, you’re all emotion and little logic.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I voted for Ralph Nader.

    I doubt it, poseur.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development