Obama Orders Pentagon To Stop Using “War On Terror” Label

How…Orwellian.

The end of the Global War on Terror — or at least the use of that phrase — has been codified at the Pentagon. Reports that the phrase was being retired have been circulating for some time amongst senior administration officials, and this morning speechwriters and other staff were notified via this e-mail to use “Overseas Contingency Operation” instead.
“Recently, in a LtGen [John] Bergman, USMC, statement for the 25 March [congressional] hearing, OMB required that the following change be made before going to the Hill,” Dave Riedel, of the Office of Security Review, wrote in an e-mail.
“OMB says: ‘This Administration prefers to avoid using the term “Long War” or “Global War on Terror” [GWOT]. Please use “Overseas Contingency Operation.’”

Say what you want about President Bush, at least he had the cojones to call a war a war regardless of what it made his critics think of him. This is especially angering in that Obama is still, very much, waging this war. Our troops are going off to fight, and possibly die, in it in Iraq and Afghanistan. Obama is even increasing our deployment to Afghanistan. But he’s too much of a coward to call it a war. So when our troops die over there, they won’t have been fighting a “war.” They’ll have been participating in an “Overseas Contingency Operation.”
What a joke.
I think maybe it’s time to review this essay.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Lioncourt

    Here is a speech you should look at Rob,

    We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
    For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
    Shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile,
    This day shall gentle his condition:
    And gentlemen in England now a-bed
    Shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
    And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
    That fought with us upon Saint Crispin’s day.

    Stop presuming to speak for soldiers.

  • sayanything-5371

    This is make nice Neville Chamberlain bullshit diplomacy. Chamberlain made nice with Hitler, came back to England and said “now we’re buds, no more problem”. Next thing you know Hitler is bombing the crap out of England.

    Why, Oh Why, can’t these arrogant idiots learn from history?

  • docdave

    Sounds like the first step towards standing down or Appeasement.

    goon, you nailed it. By Obamas twisted logic since we are no longer at war, we can disarm the military.

  • Mickey

    Let’s all sing Kum Ba Yah…

  • Nate

    More proof that obama and dems are dumber then a box of rocks. What on earth are they supposed to call it now? The Justified Fight against American Imperialism and control of the world? What a bunch of idiots, how stupid can dems get? You think that they’ve reached the peak of stupidity and then they prove that they haven’t even got to the base camp of stupidity when it comes to climbing the Mount Everest of stupidity. You think that they’ve gotten to the peak of stupidity and they prove that they’ve just begun.

  • Mark

    So what will the terrorists call their “war” against us now?

    Obamba is a fool!

  • http://www.toadpond.com/ SuperToad

    From the 9/11 commission hearings. Dated July 9, 2003. (Source):

    … our attackers had decided that they were at war with us long before we realized we were at war with them. War for them began with preparations for attack and the assembly of forces to execute their attacks.

    There is no disputing the fact that Islamofascism declared war on the West long ago, long before 9/11/01. They brought war to us, and they will continue to do so — per their interpretation of their religion — until they defeat us, or we defeat them. They do not seek diplomacy, nor peace. They seek only dominance in the name of their twisted view of their religion. They are willing to die in their efforts to accomplish their goal.

    Would that the Pansy-In-Chief could show even a modicum of that resolve. It is a war we are in. Period. No matter what the Milquetoast wants to call it. Bringing the troops home will not stop it. It will only bring the war back to our own doorstep again.

    Giving the enemy time and space to rally, regroup, recover, and re-arm is just begging for future terrorism (crap! Saying the word terrorism is now considerd Bad-Speak. I should have said “man-caused disaster!”. Egads. Hope I didn’t hurt any fragile feewings )

  • Lioncourt

    So when our troops die over there, they won’t have been fighting a “war.”

    Do you really think they give a shit? If you did you might have had the stones to volunteer. Your standing up for the troops is ridiculous.

  • Mark

    Do you really think they give a shit? If you did you might have had the stones to volunteer. Your standing up for the troops is ridiculous.

    Your kind of comments just infuriate me. You, and people like you judging people you have never met nor know anything about. Next, I suppose we will hear about all your medals and your bravery under fire.

    God!

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    “Overseas Contingency Operation.”

    Sounds like the first step towards standing down or Appeasement.
    Stay tuned NOBAMA is screwing up daily and the media is failing to call him on it.

  • http://www.toadpond.com/ SuperToad

    The goal of the Left has been plainly visible since the peace-love-flowers 60′s. And we have been incrementally shifted, little by little towards complete and total pussification by an over-sensitive bunch of pantywaists.

    Renaming the “Global War On Terror” to “Overseas Contingency Operation” is pure wimpification for the sake of wimpification. It accomplishes nothing other than revealing our soft underside.

    Give me a freakin’ break.

    The left places too much emphasis upon making the U.S. seem nice-nice and flacid just so the rest of the world will like us more. We cannot be seen as taking part in a war [Oh My Gawd! He said it! *]. No, it must be softened, so the we don’t seem too brutish.

    Somehow, I just don’t think ZeroBambam gets it. Forces like Islamofascism, as well as countries such as Iran and North Korea, have us (and/or our allies) in their crosshairs, and no amount of “talk”, “diplomacy”, or “softening our stance” is going to stop them.

    In fact, showing how nice-nice we can be, how lily-livered we are, how… [pass me a Kleenex] sensitive we are only emboldens our enemies.

    The rest of the world is watching. Some are licking their chops.

  • http://getmoneywithjay.com/ Jason Colon

    This is interesting, I always thought that the name “War On Terror” was something Elmer Fudd”ish”.

  • bill-tb

    Didn’t the dimwitted one read the 9/11 commission report?

  • http://norseberserker.blogspot.com/ Rugby Reader

    The so-called “war on terror” is a joke.

  • Lioncourt

    If you only had the slightest clue what Orwellian actually means, understood the point of 1984…

    Did you?

    “We’ve always been at war with Eastasia”

    Why don’t you give me your treatise on 1984. I need a laugh.

  • Mickey

    Where is a George Patton when you need him?

  • Hannitized

    Say what you want about President Bush, at least he had the cojones to call a war a war regardless of what it made his critics think of him.

    Really?

    One question comes to mind while reading the New York Times’ report today that the Bush administration has decided to change the name of its counterterrorist campaign from “the global war on terrorism” to “the global struggle against violent extremism”: Are these guys really this clueless?

    Say it aint so?

    http://www.slate.com/id/2123412/

  • Mickey

    When the first suicide bomber walks into a New York hotel and kills several dozen innocent victims, who will Obama blame?

  • Hannitized

    Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the National Press Club on Monday that he had “objected to the use of the term ‘war on terrorism’ before, because if you call it a war, then you think of people in uniform as being the solution.” He said the threat instead should be defined as violent extremists, with the recognition that “terror is the method they use.”

    Although the military is heavily engaged in the mission now, he said, future efforts require “all instruments of our national power, all instruments of the international communities’ national power.” The solution is “more diplomatic, more economic, more political than it is military,” he concluded.

    Why call it a war if it ain’t a war?

    Joint Chief says it ain’t a war…

  • http://www.sayanythingblog.com/ electnixon

    Do you really think they give a shit? If you did you might have had the stones to volunteer. Your standing up for the troops is ridiculous.

    Lioncourt:
    Fuck You. The chickenhawk argument is disengenuine at best. You are making unfounded assumptions and your argument has nothing to do with Rob’s comment. Fuck you.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    Suitepotato
    you buy into the rhetoric, chump, a bit to much to be lecturing me about 1984.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    It was ‘orwellian’ to begin with. No one needs a war on a concept. Get real, pooch-fuckers.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    Personally I’d call it “Operation Slaughter The Bad Guys”.

  • sayanything-2483

    Egads. Hope I didn’t hurt any fragile feewings )
    SuperToad on March 25, 2009 at 06:21 am

    The only ones who disagree with you will be the anti-American lefties.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    Don’t like it Sparkie? We wanted to call it “The War on Everyone Sparkie, Dino, Buzz, Hannitized, Lioncourt, and All the Other Liberals Would Like to Make Special Friends With” but it didn’t fit on the t-shirts.

    If you only had the slightest clue what Orwellian actually means, understood the point of 1984…

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development