Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, February 29, 2008

Obama Not So Anti-NAFTA After All

Apparently one of Obama’s top economic advisers, Austan Goolsbee, as been talking to officials in Canada and telling them that Obama’s anti-free trade rhetoric on the campaign trail - particularly his railing against NAFTA - was just “campaign rhetoric.”

WASHINGTON, Feb. 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/—“Senator Barack Obama faces a huge credibility gap on NAFTA,” declared Tom Buffenbarger, president of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM). “In a nationally televised debate, he told Ohioans he would renegotiate the treaty. But just weeks earlier, his senior economic adviser signaled to a foreign government that the Senator’s anti-NAFTA stance would be just ‘campaign rhetoric.’”

According to the CTV Television Network, a senior economic adviser to the Obama campaign, Austan Goolsbee, contacted the Canadian Consulate General in Chicago to telegraph Obama’s pro-NAFTA stance. Goolsbee is the Robert P. Gwinn Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago, a Fulbright Scholar and a New York Times columnist.

As someone very much in favor of free trade I’m actually a bit relieved that Obama is in favor of maintaining free trade with our neighbors to the north and would hope that he’d expand such an attitude to include all nations of the world.  All the better for both our economy and the economies of our various trading partners.

But for the anti-free trade left - particularly protectionists like Senator Byron Dorgan who just got done endorsing Obama - this isn’t happy news at all.  And even for people in favor of free trade all this illustrates is Obama’s duplicity, and his willingness to say whatever it takes to get elected.

Now when it comes to sincerity and honesty it’s not like Hillary is a better option, but it’s worth noting that Obama isn’t the sainted political messiah we’ve been led to believe he is.

Comments

As someone very much in favor of free trade I’m actually a bit relieved that Obama is in favor of maintaining free trade with our neighbors to the north and would hope that he’d expand such an attitude to include all nations of the world.

I wouldn’t assume that he was lying to the unions and not the Canadians.

kbiel on February 29, 2008 at 04:15 pm

The more I read about Obama, the more I find Spangler to be insightful.

Wing Chun Geologist on February 29, 2008 at 04:19 pm

Very interesting facts on the possible renegotiation of NAFTA in The American Thinker:

Under the terms of NAFTA, Canada is prohibited from cutting off oil exports to the US if there is a worldwide shortage or supply disruption unless supplies are also rationed to Canadian consumers by the same amount.

After the Hillary/Obama debate, Canada’s trade minister pointed out that if NAFTA is re-opened, Canada might want to opt out of this clause, which would then leave Canada free to sell its oil to any other country for whatever price it could get

Opening a can of worms that would jeopardize every American’s way of life in order to get a few more votes.  That’s not change, that is from the same old Democratic play book.
DKK

LifeTrek on February 29, 2008 at 04:52 pm

I’m not particularly pro-free trade, but I don’t see trade with Canada and Mexico as being harmful to the good old US of A.

Dollars sent to Mexico are far more likely to be recycled into the American economy than dollars sent to China. Mexico will not use the money from any trade imbalance to buy more weapons to threaten us and Bullyu its neighbors.

And Mexico is basically a Democracy (granted a corupt one), while China is a one party dictatorship transitioning from Communist to National Socialism.

I would be a lot happier if I could go down to Sportsmart and buy some athletic shoes made in Mexico.

Any politician who’s complaining about NAFTA, while not saying what they will do about a huge trade imbalance with China, that China is using to finance and unprecedented military build-up, is simply being a hypocrat.

Wing Chun Geologist on February 29, 2008 at 11:24 pm
Avatar for Carol

Obama showed his true face, lying will not get him elected. I wonder, what else he was lying about to us,
maybe his truth is shallow and not worthy his candidacy.
I will never vote for him again.

Carol on March 1, 2008 at 12:15 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.