Obama Mouthpiece Refers To Ahmadinejad As The “Elected Leader” Of Iran

Elected in a rigged election, of course, the protesters of which were attacked and murdered in the streets by said “elected” regime.


I know there’s a lot of dissent in this country about America’s proper role in international diplomacy. Interventionist or non-interventionist, pro-war or anti-war, is there something wrong with calling a spade a spade? The Iranian regime isn’t legitimate. The election was rigged. The protesters of that rigged election were brutally suppressed with violence and murder.
Let’s at least be honest about that.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://www.fairytalebaby.com/category_28/Shoes.htm jason

    Seriously, they are baffling idiots!

  • ellinas

    Ronald Reagan calles Marcos the dictator of the Phillipines an elected leader. What else is new?

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    He was the elected leader via stealing an election.

  • ellinas

    He was the elected leader via stealing an election.
    goon on August 4, 2009 at 04:30 pm

    Yeah! I remember. People were calling from the Philippines, the news media reporting the same, and old Ronny making the announcement the Marcos won fair and square.

  • Bat One

    Sigh! One more chorus of “Someone Else Did It Too, So It’s Okay for Us.”

    Of course it never occurs to you, or Dino, or Hannitized either, what this adolescent attempt at rationalization says about you. (And it IS adolescent… essentially the same argument that an 11 year old girl uses when her mother tells her she’s too young to wear lipstick and go on a date!)

    First, it labels you a hypocrite. By pointing to the misdeeds of someone else, you are implicitly acknowledging that it is a misdeed. So in effect you are saying that you know its wrong, but its okay because you have the excuse that someone else also did wrong before. That’s hypocrisy in anyone’s book.

    Second, you are implicitly acknowledging that those on your side are without morals, ethics, or character. After all, you’ve already recognized the previous misdeed as such. So offering a lame excuse speaks more to your lack of character and integrity than anything else. Why use Reagan’s mistake to justify Obama’s.

  • ellinas

    Bat One. Your above post is just sour grapes, and wrong on all counts.
    No it has nothing to do “Someone Else Did It Too, So It’s Okay for Us.”. The USA has a long history of supporting dictators.
    To point to one side of the political aisle and say: Oh! Lookie the Dem’s called/support Ahmadinejad As The “Elected Leader” Of Iran, is nothing short of hypocrisy.
    Then trying to score brownie points with the cons you write among other things these nuggets:

    “Second, you are implicitly acknowledging that those on your side are without morals, ethics, or character.”

    If those on my side are without morals, ethics, or character
    because they called Ahmadinejad elected leader of Iran, the same applies to those on your side for calling the election in the Philippines fair and square.

    “So offering a lame excuse speaks more to your lack of character and integrity than anything else”

    To the above I say: Trying to leave out the fact that both sides do it speaks more to your lack of character and integrity than anything else.

    Why use Reagan’s mistake to justify Obama’s.

    In using Reagan’s “mistake” I am not justifying Obama’s.
    I am merely saying that supporting dictators it is American as apple pie.

    “First, it labels you a hypocrite.”

    The hypocrite label is more appropriately bestowed upon you, as you are trying to hide the fact that both sides do it, and then you try to stop others from pointing out the truth by calling them a plethora of undesirable epithets. Shame on you.
    May the fleas of a thousand camels infest your crotch.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development