Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, June 20, 2008

Obama: McCain’s Plan To Lower Gas Prices By Allowing More Drilling For Oil “Makes No Sense”

Obama can’t make sense out of the idea that drilling for more oil, thus increasing oil supplies to meet rising oil demand, will lower gas prices despite the fact that it’s a basic example of the bedrock economic principle which rules our economy.

Hey, the guy puts on a good show in front of an audience.  Nobody ever accused him of being all that smart.

CHICAGO (AP) — Barack Obama said Friday that presidential rival John McCain’s proposal to allow offshore drilling “makes absolutely no sense at all” as he headed to Florida to put the Republican on the spot over the issue.

Obama said opening up the U.S. coastline to oil exploration would not give Americans any appreciable savings until 2030.

“Even then you’re looking at cents on a gallon of gas,” Obama told Democratic governors at a meeting in his hometown. “Who knows 22 years from now, what would gas be at the pace that we’re going right now?”

With that last quote Obama unwittingly puts his finger on the problem with his opposition to new oil drilling: We don’t know what the oil markets are going to be like 10 years from now.  Heck, we don’t even know what the markets are going to be like next week.  Which is why the ups and downs of the oil markets are constantly being reported in the media.

Because of this, no single leader or group of leaders can command a market and expect positive results on a regular basis.  Twenty-two years from the now average fuel efficiency of American vehicles could be 200mpg and our domestic oil supplies might be all we need for the next 200 years.  Twenty-two years from now we might not even need gasoline to power our vehicles?  Who knows?

Nobody.  Which is something that we do know.  Barack Obama has no idea what this country’s energy situation is going to be in the coming decades.  So because of that, we should use the resources we have at hand.  Right now, until something better comes along that can be a viable alternative in the energy market, that’s oil.

So let’s get more of it already and quit quibbling about whether new wells in Alaska and off the coast of Florida are going to drop per-gallon gas prices by a dollar or by just a few cents.

Comments

Avatar for Paul L. McCord Jr.

It is refreshing to hear someone that has some common sense. This was a well written post.

Paul L. McCord Jr. on June 20, 2008 at 08:19 pm

What..? ( sweat hog Vinny Barbarino)

Adding supply to meet demand wil never work.  Look at water.  we have all the water we could ever use and the costs keep rising..

tongue firmly implanted in cheek

atease


atease

atease on June 20, 2008 at 09:39 pm
Avatar for Bob

I saw this loser on TV speaking about his non-ideas.  We need to drill now because we have allowed these Libs to dominate the scene by stopping our production over the last several decades.  Drill in the Ocean, the Hills, DRILL THROUGH A CARIBOU’S SKULL IN ALASKA IF YOU HAVE TO.  These Libs think it is Ok to pay the stinking Saudis for the oil while they laugh at us and spend the proceeds on support for madrases (schools) bringing up little terrorists that hate us.  We are supporting our enemies!  DRILL FOR THE DAM OIL YOU FOOLS.  GLOBAL WARMING IS ALSO A FARCE.  The earth is cooling over the last decade you fools.  Dream on about electric cars, etc.  The big old SUN heats the earth, not CO2.  Co2 would cause the next ice age before it causes the earth to warm.

Bob on June 20, 2008 at 09:39 pm

How can we expect any Democrat to understand the concept of supply/demand/equilibrium, when they think that a “windfall profits tax” that will increase the company’s overhead costs, will somehow lower the price of gas?

Honestly, though, some of the Dems’ “solutions” to the gas price issue seem so completely inane that I’m wondering if they’re really more along the lines of Barack’s “rail against NAFTA in front of Teamsters, but call Canadian foreign ministers to tell them it’s just pandering” strategy.  I.e., it’s just a populist talking point that wins the votes of people who don’t think too deeply about the economics of the matter, but like the sound of a greener energy policy or “punishing” greedy oil companies. 

I mean really, anyone who thinks deeper than the soundbite has probably already made up their mind which candidate is going to be receiving their vote.  Right? 

But if that hunch is right, will it benefit or hurt Obama?  I honestly can think of good arguments both ways…

sonofasillyperson on June 20, 2008 at 10:54 pm
Avatar for Kudzu Fire

Liberal =Marxist = Progressive = Socialist

if they understood supply vs demand economics, they could not be liberal.  They have no God but government so for them supply and demand is a myth.  Government does it.

Kudzu Fire on June 22, 2008 at 01:09 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.