“Obama in Bush’s Clothing”

Charles Krauthammer is up to his usual high standards with a piece on Obama’s flip flopping and political posturing.

If hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue, then the flip-flops on previously denounced anti-terror measures are the homage that Barack Obama pays to George Bush. Within 125 days, Obama has adopted with only minor modifications huge swaths of the entire, allegedly lawless Bush program.
The latest flip-flop is the restoration of military tribunals. During the 2008 campaign, Obama denounced them repeatedly, calling them an “enormous failure.” Obama suspended them upon his swearing-in. Now they’re back.
Of course, Obama will never admit in word what he’s doing in deed. As in his rhetorically brilliant national-security speech yesterday claiming to have undone Bush’s moral travesties, the military commissions flip-flop is accompanied by the usual Obama three-step: (a) excoriate the Bush policy, (b) ostentatiously unveil cosmetic changes, (c) adopt the Bush policy.

Throw in a little Orwellian “Newspeak” and it becomes plain that either Obama’s campaign rhetoric was “boob bait for his leftist Bubbas”, or the reality of actually governing this great nation and keeping it safe from our enemies has intruded upon the lovely little fantasy constructed in the ivory halls of leftist academia.

Observers of all political stripes are stunned by how much of the Bush national security agenda is being adopted by this new Democratic government. Victor Davis Hanson (National Review) offers a partial list: “The Patriot Act, wiretaps, e-mail intercepts, military tribunals, Predator drone attacks, Iraq (i.e., slowing the withdrawal), Afghanistan (i.e., the surge) — and now Guantanamo.”
Jack Goldsmith (The New Republic) adds: rendition — turning over terrorists seized abroad to foreign countries; state secrets — claiming them in court to quash legal proceedings on rendition and other erstwhile barbarisms; and the denial of habeas corpus — to detainees in Afghanistan’s Bagram prison, indistinguishable logically and morally from Guantanamo.

I think most conservatives are willing to give Obama a pass on his hypocrisy here. After all, we were defending the last administration when it came to national security. The fact that this administration is not tearing down our safeguards wholesale, is in fact a bit of a relief! However, to those barking moonbats who saw Obama as some kind of ACLU wet dream? This must be the part of the teen slasher movie where it seems like the danger was over, only to find out that the monster…
Really.
Wasn’t.
Dead.
Krauthammer concludes:

The genius of democracy is that the rotation of power forces the opposition to come to its senses when it takes over. When the new guys, brought to power by popular will, then adopt the policies of the old guys, a national consensus is forged and a new legitimacy established.
That’s happening before our eyes. The Bush policies in the war on terror won’t have to await vindication by historians. Obama is doing it day by day. His denials mean nothing. Look at his deeds.

Obama vindicates Bush.

Howling moonbattery: Coming soon to an outraged liberal near you!

Heh.
Cross posted at Proof Positive

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array Bat One

    …hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue…

    Damn, I wish I could write half as well as Mr. Krauthammer!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/Anna/ Anna

    LOL @ Bat One
    I think someone is trying to pull the wool over your eyes ;-)

  • http://www.finetuxedos.com/ Tuxedo

    Cosmetic changes such as Obama’s declaration that “we will give detainees greater latitude in selecting their own counsel.” Laughable.Obama will never admit in word what he’s doing in deed. As in his rhetorically brilliant recent national-security speech claiming to have undone Bush’s moral travesties, the military commissions flip-flop is accompanied by the usual Obama three-step: (a) excoriate the Bush policy, (b) ostentatiously unveil cosmetic changes, (c) adopt the Bush policy.

  • studakota

    I think I know when the idea of running for POTUS came to Sen. Obama. Actually , it probably occurred to Michelle first. She’s watching some show about the new Fall TV lineup and she’s taken aback when she sees they’re planning a series on the “Geico Cavemen”. She probably said something like “Shit! if they’re dumb enough to go for that crap why can’t we make you President”? She was right!

  • Bat One

    I hate to lamb-aste you, but that’s a really b-a-a-a-d job of photo-shopping, Proof. I just know Ewe can do better.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Sure! Just ram it down my throat, just because I’m on my baa-ck up computer! You should listen to Anna!
    She epreciates (sic) good humor!
    If you don’t like it, you can just get the flock out of here! Heh.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    Krauthammer? Shoot for the stands, man. Go for P.J. O’Rourke. I admire the writing abilities of both actually.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development