Obama Doesn’t Get It: Tax Incentives Won’t Make Businesses Hire Employees

Remember that over the last couple of years these same politicians have inflated the cost of hiring employees by jacking up the minimum wage and expanding unemployment benefits (among other things). Now they’re wondering how how to encourage more hiring. And their brilliant idea?
A tax credit for businesses that hire.

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama on Tuesday proposed a tax incentive for small businesses that add workers, even as Congress struggles to figure out how such an idea would work.
Lawmakers have been working for several months to develop a tax credit for businesses that hire workers, but they have been unable to figure out how to do it in a way that won’t be abused.
Neither Obama nor his top advisers offered details Tuesday. They didn’t say how big the tax break would be nor how it would be administered. Obama pledged to work on the issue with Congress.
“I believe it’s worthwhile to create a tax incentive to encourage small businesses to add and keep employees and I’m going to work with Congress to pass one,” Obama said.

This is sort of like cash for clunkers, but instead of getting credit for buying a new car you’re getting credit for hiring a new employee. And much like cash for clunkers, this isn’t actually going to generate a lot of activity that wouldn’t have happened anyway. Because people don’t buy new cars based on a tax credit, and business owners don’t hire new employees based on a tax credit. Those decisions are largely made on need.
This tax credit will give businesses that were going to hire anyway a tax credit. Not necessarily a bad thing in these uncertain economic times, but it’s not likely to accomplish what Obama and his cronies want to accomplish.
What’s frustrating is that the solution is glaringly obvious. And clearly Obama and his cronies know what the problem is. It’s too expensive for business owners to hire new people right now. That’s why Obama and his fellow liberals want to offer the tax credit. But what they should be doing, because as I’ve already pointed out this tax credit is likely to be ineffectual, is address some of the reasons why hiring has become so expensive in the first place.
Roll back the minimum wage. Stop expanding unemployment entitlements. Cut payroll taxes. That will make businesses more likely to hire again.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Jim2991

    “business owners don’t hire new employees based on a tax credit. Those decisions are largely made on need” <– absolutely correct! Besides, the cost/employee to comply with the federal regulations today is $7000/person, so you really need to need someone.

  • jimmypop

    i will happily hire a person for as long as i get them for free. the way i see it, i pay enough and dont think its wrong to get my money back.

  • sayanything-15427

    Day late, dollar short, etc etc etc Republicans/Conservatives have been suggesting similar ideas for quite awhile now; but stupidly they charged down their Keynsian path and screwed us up too far for simple tax incentives to work.

    Now they need to cut all meddling with taxes all together.

  • bill-tb

    The part about demand is where our dear reader draws a blank. He is terribly ignorant od anything but ideology.

  • OregonGuy

    YIkes!

    A sponge with lips!
    .

  • sayanything-6955

    Will be at a minimum. I need a proofreader sometimes!

  • spartacus

    Obama Doesn’t Get It: Tax Incentives Won’t Make Businesses Hire Employees

    That’s far from all the dolt doesn’t get.

  • spartacus

    ^ Remember the time Obama mistook a window in the Oval office for a door? But don’t make fun of him, he’s a Liberal, they’re sensitive. That makes it okay, in fact it makes it COOL!

  • sayanything-4416

    Man up, weak sister. Nothing in life is certain. I’m sure you didn’t expect your republicans to bring you the meltdown we had last year.

    Yeah, that’s right Mr. “Labour”. Enjoy your real estate holdings that are worth half what they were. That happened BEFORE Obama. Here’s hoping they drop further. They probably will.

  • sayanything-4056

    Jobs are created by sales, so simple, but a lib just doesn’t understand the concept, so sad.

  • OregonGuy

    It’s both easier and cheaper for me to work longer hours, or require those who work for me to work longer hours than it is for me to hire a new employee.

    One gets the sense from Democrats that all labour is equal to any other labour input. This is not true.

    It normally takes two to twelve weeks to get a new hire up to a point where they are beginning to make a contribution to the overall operation of a firm. There is no “turn-key” solution to a new hire. The reasons are as diverse as are the businesses that seek to employ a new hire.

    Raising the cost of a new hire can occur in several different ways. First, increasing the cost to a firm of an entry level employee by arbitrarilty increasing the wage of said employee through minimum wage laws. Trust me, some employees aren’t worth squat during their intial introduction to the firm. In my eyes, they owe me for hiring them.

    Next? Requiring me to treat the next employee with the same work rules as the first employee. Nothing should be further from the truth. The world is hard and life is long, and if you don’t measure up that isn’t my fault. Blame your public school teachers for telling you that you should work in groups and come up with group solutions. You work for me, you’ve problem. I’m going to judge you by your work, no one else’s.

    Finally, your Change and Hope politicians have brought us–your prospective employers–to a point of uncertainty never before faced by small businesses. We know that taxes are going to go up. We know that we will be mandated to spend more money for you as an employee, but as this moment, we have no clue what that penalty will be. We know that the value of our holdings is, or has been, greatly reduced by the actions of a willful federal bureaucracy that has never been engaged in private enterprise, and has no experience upon with which to draw objection over increases in state and federal guidelines on workplace, health and investment. Oh, and our real estate holdings are worth half what they were just a year ago.

    Farming? Prices are up. But do you actually want to buy a new combine this year? Wouldn’t you be better off putting that purchase off, at least a year?

    Certainty and uncertainty. Increasing uncertainty galvanizes investment.

    Change. Hope.
    .

  • sayanything-7743

    In my opinion, your analysis is spot on and reflects what my clients and business owners I deal tell me. Until they see what shakes out of Washington and Annapolis (actually, insert any state capital here) and studies the impact on their business, most are afraid to act. From what I am hearing, all believe it will cost their businesses more and they will need to cut costs by using a smaller work force producing more. Hopeless change you can believe in.

  • sayanything-4808

    And so the economy kneels, parts its kimono and begins to contemplate the blade while self-appointed kaishakunin Obama prepares to remove its head no matter what.

  • sayanything-6955

    Until cap and tax, health care boondoggle, er legislation, and the amount tax rates are going to go up, on top of what was mentioned Rob, hiring will at a minimum, if any at all. Too much uncertainty for business’s to go out on a limb.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development