Obama: Cockamamie Bamboozler-In-Chief

The Whistler  •  November 22, 2008


“Cockamamie idea= straw man” Nowhere does Bush say that “the Executive branch does not need to obey the Constitution”. I still can’t believe this guy bamboozled enough people to get elected President!
Note the diss on Bush from Obama AG nominee Eric Holder near the end of the video.
Hat tip Gateway Pundit
Cross posted at Proof Positive

Tags:


«
»
  • http://bullwinkleblog.com/ Bullwinkle

    Did you bother to look up what certifications were required?

    Bush was not following those provisions. He was listening to everything.

    – Lying piece of shit, Lyingcourt

    Was he? Really? Cite a source to back up that claim, A VALID SOURCE, not some Leftist blog. Either that or admit you are a lying piece of shit, you lying piece of shit.

    BTW, here’s a clue for you:

    On December 16, 2005, The New York Times printed a story asserting that following 9/11, “President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to search for evidence of terrorist activity without the court-approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying” as part of the War on Terrorism. [8]

    Under a presidential order signed in 2002, the intelligence agency monitored the international telephone calls and international e-mail messages of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of people inside the United States without warrants over the past three years in an effort to track possible “dirty numbers” linked to Al Qaeda, the officials said. The agency, they said, still seeks warrants to monitor entirely domestic communications.

    The revelation of this program caused a widespread controversy, with legal experts and politicians concluding that it violates the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and other legal experts saying that the FISA law only applied to domestic to domestic calls and not to overseas calls and communications that involved a foreign intelligence threat. Bush administration officials such as the Attorney General defended the program by citing that this was a part of the justification that the Clinton administration used in its warrantless search of Aldrich Ames. They claimed that since Ames was spying for a foreign power, presidential power applied and FISA did not.[9]

    Using talking points from Marxist sites like DailyKos will only prove you to be a liar, you lying piece of shit. Your version of the truth doesn’t even come close. Neither does Kos’.

    That’s what you get when your ideology is based on lies, you Marxist turd.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Or…

  • Lioncourt

    So you are saying if the Bush administration committed crimes than the right thing to do is to ignore them in the interest of bi-partisanship?

  • Lioncourt

    The President’s use of signing statements.
    The President’s use of executive privilege.
    The President’s wiretapping of American citizens.

    I believe all of these are unconstitutional.

  • eneils Bailey

    Hey,
    You guys are coming down too hard on Obama.

    I come from from the Chris Matthews school of political adoration.

    Let your biological functions dictate how you feel about a candidate; now our President-elect and/or same sex symbol.
    Remember that Matthews stated that Obama made his trouser mouse come alive, bite his leg, and send a tingle down into his drawers.

    I had similar sensation the other night; dreamt about Obama, felt this warm tingling sensation down my leg, woke up, and then discovered I had shit up the hot and spicy Mexican dinner from the night before.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Lion Court: The President’s use of signing statements.
    The President’s use of executive privilege.
    The President’s wiretapping of American citizens.

    I believe all of these are unconstitutional.

    Really well that sells it for me.
    I can’t wait till the NOBAMA administration does something questionable, it will be interesting to see if the NOBAMA mania media will actually report or poo poo it.

  • http://bullwinkleblog.com/ Bullwinkle

    Gee, I bet that Lyingcourt didn’t even know about this.

    Right, you lying piece of shit?

    This one must have escaped your attention too, somehow.

    Executive orders by previous administrations including Clinton’s and Carter’s authorized the attorneys general to exercise authority with respect to both options under FISA.[103][104] In Clinton’s executive order, he authorized his attorney general “[pursuant] to section 302(a)(1)” to conduct physical searches without court order “if the Attorney General makes the certifications required by that section”.

    Go ahead and tell us some more of your version of the truth, you pathetic, lying asshole. Some of the slower, metally challenged readers of this blog might not know what a lying piece of shit you are, YET.

  • Lioncourt

    The President signs bills into law. Once signed he is bound by them. He is not above the law. Signing statements exempting the Executive from the law are unconstitutional.

    The Congress has the right to impeach and try the President. Therefore they must be able to investigate. The President claiming executive privilege for subordinates for general policy and not for direct advice is unconstitutional. His ordering these subordinates to ignore subpoenas is also unconstitutional.

    The wiretapping of US citizens is in direct violation of the 4th amendment. The President cannot do it and it is unconstitutional.

    We have a President not a king. He is not exempt from the law just because of his position.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/some_hints/ AKAJOEL

    With the state of the nation’s economy in such disarray, why would the Obamunists waste time on this bullshit?

    After all, they’ve got their own laundry list of intentions to crap all over the Constitution.

    Plus, they’ll be too busy spreading our money around.

    Second Bill Of Rights, anyone?

  • Jerry

    I still can’t believe

    Amazing, huh? Shows me how weak the republican party’s gotten with this compasionate conservative crap.
    Stand for something!

    So you are saying if the Bush administration committed crimes than the right thing to do is to ignore them in the interest of bi-partisanship?

    And, Lioncourt.. Tou’re so far out in left field, you just don’t know it. And, probably will never admit the truth.
    Because your mantra is the same as all the others looking to bash the Bush. Broke laws.
    Nobody seems to recognise, that even though you might disagree with housing Terrorists, Interrogation Techniques, Phone Taps and the like, if there was something legaly wrong, It Would Have Come Out By Now!
    It’s all politics. Bash Bush. Bash the Administration. Make the Democrats look Altruistic and get ‘em elected!
    So, if you’ve bought into this illegal stuff, you’ve been gamed.

  • Lioncourt

    Go ahead and tell us some more of your version of the truth, you pathetic, lying asshole. Some of the slower, metally challenged readers of this blog might not know what a lying piece of shit you are, YET.

    Did you bother to look up what certifications were required?

    Bush was not following those provisions. He was listening to everything.

  • ellinas

    I had similar sensation the other night; dreamt about Obama, felt this warm tingling sensation down my leg, woke up, and then discovered I had shit up the hot and spicy Mexican dinner from the night before.

    eneils Bailey on November 22, 2008 at 09:20 am

    May I suggest “Depends” adult diapers for you inability to hold your bodily functions?

  • Jerry

    “PRESENT”!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/some_hints/ AKAJOEL

    So you are saying…

    Re-read it a few more times if you’re having trouble understanding what I’m saying. It’s plain English.

    Obama’s a lying piece of street-thug Chicago shit who can’t be trusted..period. You people who elected him are fools. Just wait, you’ll see.

  • Lioncourt

    And what is your answer to the bovine excrement accusations that the Executive branch is exempt from the Constitution?
    An example please!

    George W. Bush a proponent of unitary executive theory. Obama thinks that is unconstitutional and it is clear from the interview that is what he is talking about. The White House Counsel’s office has written numerous memos taking positions that the President is above oversight.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Proof that goes to show you if enough moron vote for someone they can get their way. Wait till they find out he isn’t going to pay for gas, their mortage, cars and he won’t be able to walk on water or part the seas.

  • http://bullwinkleblog.com/ Bullwinkle

    One year’s worth of those ‘unconstituional’ signing statements. Where was the lying Left and their claims of unconstitutionality back in ’79?

    Jimmy Carter April 10, 1979 Taiwan Relations Act Statement on Signing H.R. 2479 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter May 26, 1979 Gold Medal for John Wayne Statement on Signing S. 631 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter June 13, 1979 Gold Medal for Hubert H. Humphrey Statement on Signing S. 613 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter June 14, 1979 Veterans’ Health Care Amendments of 1979 Statement on Signing S. 7 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter June 22, 1979 Amendments to the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 Statement on Signing S. 869 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter August 15, 1979 Food Stamp Act Amendments Statement on Signing H.R. 4057 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter August 15, 1979 Department of State, International Communication Agency, and Board for International Broadcasting Appropriations Bill Statement on Signing H.R. 3363 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter August 15, 1979 Fishery Conservation and Management Act Amendments Statement on Signing S. 917 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter September 25, 1979 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1980 Statement on Signing H.R. 4388 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter September 27, 1979 Panama Canal Act of 1979 Statement on Signing H.R. 111 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter October 4, 1979 Health Planning and Resources Development Amendments of 1979 Statement on Signing S. 544 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter October 10, 1979 Federal Magistrate Act of 1979 Statement on Signing S. 237 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter October 10, 1979 Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act Amendments of 1979 Statement on Signing S. 756 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter October 10, 1979 United States Travel Service Appropriations Bill Statement on Signing S. 233 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter October 17, 1979 Department of Education Organization Act Statement on Signing S. 210 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter November 19, 1979 District of Columbia Retirement Reform Act Statement on Signing S. 1037 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter November 28, 1979 Milk Price Support Bill Statement on Signing H.R. 4167 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter November 28, 1979 Veterans’ Disability Compensation and Survivors’ Benefits Amendments of 1979 Statement on Signing H.R. 2282 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter November 30, 1979 Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1980 Statement on Signing H.R. 4440 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter December 13, 1979 Domestic Volunteer Service Act Amendments of 1979 Statement on Signing S. 239 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter December 28, 1979 Endangered Species Act Amendments Statement on Signing S. 1143 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter December 28, 1979 Financial Institutions Deregulation Bill Statement on Signing H.R. 4998 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter December 31, 1979 Economic Compact Between New York and New Jersey Statement on Signing H.R. 4943 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter December 31, 1979 Department of Energy National Security and Military Applications of Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 1980 Statement on Signing S. 673 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter December 31, 1979 Knoxville International Energy Exposition of 1982 Statement on Signing H.R. 5079 Into Law.
    Jimmy Carter December 31, 1979 Beef and Veal Imports Bill Statement on Signing H.R. 2727 Into Law.

    And 1934?

    President Date Title

    Franklin D. Roosevelt March 27, 1934 Statement Regarding the Signing of the Vinson Navy Bill.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt May 9, 1934 Statement on Signing Sugar Industry Legislation.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt May 18, 1934 Statement on Signing Crime Bill.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt June 18, 1934 Statement on Signing the Hayden-Cartwright Act.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt June 19, 1934 Statement on Signing Bill Giving the Supreme Court Regulatory Power in the Federal Courts.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt June 28, 1934 Statement on Signing Bill for Regulation of Grazing on Public Lands.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt June 30, 1934 Statement of Approval of the Railroad Retirement Bill.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt June 30, 1934 Statement Approving Amendments to Bankruptcy Law

    The lying Marxist assholes would rather lie than tell the truth even when the truth can be so found so easily that it makes them look like the pathetic lying assholes they truly are.

    Results 1 – 10 of about 226,000 for signing statements carter. (0.19 seconds)

    .19 seconds could have prevented Lyingcourt from looking so much like the pathetic, skin-wasting piece of shit it really is. It doesn’t care that facts are readily available to anyone who cares to look. It would rather lie.

    Wouldn’t you, you lying piece of shit?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/some_hints/ AKAJOEL

    Did you bother to look up what certifications were required?
    Lioncourt on November 22, 2008 at 12:57 pm

    Did you bother to check the counteracting derivatives of the authenticated verifiable sanctions?

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    So you are saying if the Bush administration committed crimes than the right thing to do is to ignore them in the interest of bi-partisanship?

    Le Twit: You are almost as good at straw men as the Bamboozler-In_chief! No one said that if crimes were committed that they should be ignored.
    However, the Democrats do have a history of trying to criminalize policy differences. (Does the “Boland Amendment” ring a bell?)

    And what is your answer to the bovine excrement accusations that the Executive branch is exempt from the Constitution?
    An example please!

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    George W. Bush a proponent of unitary executive theory. Obama thinks that is unconstitutional and it is clear from the interview that is what he is talking about. The White House Counsel’s office has written numerous memos taking positions that the President is above oversight.

    I asked for an example of an action taken by the President that was not subject to the Constitution. You couldn’t give me even one. You give me theory, without even a citation of that!

    The weakness of your argument is exceeded only by the candlepower of your intellect.

  • JC in OBX

    AMERICA ELECTED A ROCK STAR FOR PRESIDENT:

    FOOLIO

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Bush was not following those provisions. He was listening to everything.

    He sees you when you’re sleeping.
    He knows when you’re awake.
    He knows if you’ve been bad or good.
    So be good for goodness sake!

    Lyingcourt has Bush confused with a Democrat!

  • http://www.malice420.com/ Malice420dotcom

    It wasn’t the Bamboozler-in-Chief that got this guy elected. It was the republican RINO’S in congress that spent like the Bamboozler-in Chief is going to spend. When we had the majority they ignored the principals which got them elected in the first place.
    We need to remove all those trying to crush the Reagen way of governing. Seldom did any of those in Washington speak up towards all the hate spewed towards Pres Bush. What a bunch of blowhards they still.
    Yeah Bush turned out to be no more of a prize except on the war on terror. He deserved much of what he got because of his turn coat bait and switch leadership style.
    The remaining turn coats sat back and said nothing. Now the same turn coat ear covering leadership is still in charge The party is still full of turn coat weasels that must go. I guess another loser election is the only way to get rid of these jack asses who still think moderation,and cherry picking groups for votes is the way to win elections.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    The President’s use of signing statements.
    The President’s use of executive privilege.
    The President’s wiretapping of American citizens.

    I believe all of these are unconstitutional.

    You may also believe in the Easter Bunny and your own competence, but that don’t make they so.

    Executive privilege is Constitutional and has been exercised by such notables as William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

    Exactly which usage of executive privilege was unconstitutional? Are is smoke all you have to blow?

    Trying to get a straight answer out of you is like nailing Jell-o® to the wall!

  • http://bullwinkleblog.com/ Bullwinkle

    Hundreds of US citizens overseas, including US troops in Iraq, have been eavesdropped on, according to two former military and NSA intercept operators, despite pledges by President George W. Bush and American intelligence officials.

    From the link the lying piece of shit, Lying court, provided.

    What part of OVERSEAS is it you don’t understand?

    What part of EVERYTHING is it that you don’t get?

    Bush was not following those provisions. He was listening to everything.

    If that’s the best you can up with you get to proudly wear the name tag, LYING MARXIST PIECE OF SHIT.

    Feel free to join Hannitized (Obama never said he’d meet with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, NEVER), Ellinas (No TAX-FREE, just the facts) WOOF (Bill Ayers isn’t a terrorist because nobody died) and Sparkie (lying ZMarxist piece of shit Claimed I said Nepalese people aren’t worth shit)in the toilet, lying Marxist piece of shit.

    Don’t try to pull yourself out with the silver handle. That’s there to get rid of shit, not rescue it.

    BTW, lying piece of shit, why aren’t you whining about Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton’s ‘crimes’?

    Hypocrite, much?

  • ellinas

    Bullwinkle buddy. Beloved friend. I see that the mouth cleaner/wash I sent you is not working. Time for something stronger.

    Ps: you also need to calm down before you have a stroke or a heart attack.

  • http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php Steven Earl Salmony

    Dear Friends,

    Science is indisputably the finest source for gaining an adequate understanding of the way the world we inhabit actually works and for accurately enough grasping the “placement” of the human species within the order of living things on Earth. But, as others have noted with such clarity and coherence, too many world-class scientists have treated the human overpopulation of Earth as a taboo topic and, even worse, perniciously participated in the politicization of the science of climate change. Barack Obama cannot know whatsoever could somehow be true, in large part, because so many scientists have failed to reasonably assume their responsibilities to science as well as to sensibly fulfill their duties as scientists.

    Rather than do what I have been doing over the past 7 years by extolling the virtues of good science, today I am going to try something different.

    What follows is a brief artistic expression that is intended to convey a symbolic meaning parallel to but distinct from, and more significant than, the literal meaning.

    Please consider an allegory: that a titanic struggle between human beings and the natural world is in the offing. It seems this struggle is fulminating now precisely because too many leaders of the 6.7 billion {soon to be 9+ billion} members of the human family generally do not share the distinctly scientific, evidence-based perspective of many within the New Scientist community. Many too many of our brothers and sisters, especially those with great wealth and power, pompously and erroneously believe that human organisms are separate from, and somehow superior to, life as we know it on Earth.

    At least to me, it appears that an epochal contest is taking shape on the far horizon between the ‘team’ of “mother culture and father profit” on one side and ‘Team’ Mother Nature on the other.

    This could be the greatest show on Earth in 10,000 years.

    The team of “mother culture and father profit” appears adamant in its willful intentionality to stay the same old business-as-usual course of recklessly overconsuming limited natural resources; relentlessly expanding large-scale production and distribution capabilities without regard to physical limitations of the natural world; and overpopulating our planetary home, come what may for children and coming generations, biodiversity, the environment and the Earth’s body.

    Team Mother Nature simply is.

    Which team will likely be seen by reasonable and sensible observers as winning the contest for success in 2012, 2020 and 2050, if the human community continues its idolatry of distinctly human overconsumption, overproduction and overpopulation activities by choosing forevermore unbridled overgrowth activities just as we are doing now?

    If the leaders of the family of humanity do not choose change, do you have any ideas about which team will prevail and when will the outcome of the colossal contest no longer be in doubt?

    Sincerely,

    Steve

    Steven Earl Salmony
    AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population,
    established 2001
    http://sustainabilityscience.org/content.html?contentid=1176

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/some_hints/ AKAJOEL

    During the campaign it was “yes we can…yes we can..yes..we can.” Now it’s “no we can’t..no we can’t, no we won’t.”

    Barack Obama’s senior advisers have been drawing up plans to lower expectations for his presidency since before the election.

    This is a CBS story. “President-elect Barack Obama and his inner circle fear that some voters expect him to turn around the economy, wind down the war in Iraq and, perhaps, cure cancer — all by the Fourth of July. They know they must manage and lower those expectations, CBS 2 Political Editor Mike Flannery reports. A top economic advisor to Obama had a glum warning for the rest of us Thursday morning: Neither the job market nor the stock market will be turning around any time soon.”

    Here is David Axelrod, the campaign director for Barack Obama, the other night in Chicago on CBS 2 Eyeball News.

    AXELROD: We are inheriting a, um, array of problems unlike any that any president has faced, maybe since Franklin Roosevelt –

    Robert Reich: This may be a long haul. 2009 is going to be a very, very hard year. Some economists are saying we’re not going to get out of this for two years. Others are saying it’s going to be three or four, maybe five years. We all have to be very careful about the expectations that we are putting on this man, our president-elect. If we all assume that it’s going to be the first hundred days, we’re going to be disappointed.

    Yes we can…no…we can’t so don’t expect it.

    So now we’ve had all these expectations. He was going to lower the seas; he was going to fix the weather; he was going to transform America; he was going to unify everybody.

    And now they’re saying, forget that, forget that, you heard Reich. It could be two to four years of this misery.

    They have no answer. So now that Obama, for the first time — this is important — for the first time in his life, is responsible for something.

    He’s the one lowering expectations. He was a community agitator. Now he’s a financial market agitator.

    I never have been able to understand why it is that the left wants to continue to trample on this whole notion of American exceptionalism.

    They don’t believe it. And they got elected on that basis. Maybe because we didn’t have a candidate who believed in it, either, or wasn’t able to talk about it that well, but here these guys are actually telling the American people that voted for them, hey, hey, hey, drop all these messiah expectations you had.

    We’re not going to get this fixed. We’re in for the long haul. This is going to be really, really, really bad.

  • http://www.seefeld.com/de/orte/leutasch.php Ferienwohnung Leutasch

    time will tell if its another mistake is done made by voting obama, but don’t be to hard on him, its not easy being the president of USA

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    I think that what O-Bomber doesn’t understand is that HE is the one who will, most likely, be bamboozled.

    This person is just aa sock-puppet for the left. they need HIM as the strawman for their agenda. Reid, Pelosi, Schumer, Dingel, etc., understand that they jeopardize their positions when they offer up their leftist agenda points without the cover of “The One”.

    Under the guise of working with, and more importantly, for the “President Elect” they enable for themselves the protection that a high profile fall-guy provides. They can justify their putrification of the financial system, the suppression of free speech, anti 2nd Amendment legislation, etc., under the guise of faux submission to the will of the new president.

    When/If these actions elicit the wrath of the citizens, they have the “pointing fingers” ready and are prepared to throw O-Hussein under his own bus……

    He, O-man, is attempting to achieve the same effect.

    By nominating and choosing to allow select Clintonistas to infest his regime he retains cover through their experience. This puts them in the tenuous spot of not wanting to fail, but not wanting to allow great success to further elevate his influence as prima-demigod of the DNC.

    If they in turn fail, he attains a propaganda grab-bag from which he can use tidbits to denounce the failure(s) as intentional deceptive malpractice by the Clinton ilk, and allow himself to appear to be above criticism to his admirers. This would cause the DNC to feast on its own…. to the benefit of the far left…..

    The game is on……

    ;-)

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    The Truth is the first to go in a communist government. Educate yourselves about how these people twist The Truth and overlook the obvious as Bullwinkle has researched so easily.

  • Lioncourt

    Was he? Really? Cite a source to back up that claim, A VALID SOURCE, not some Leftist blog. Either that or admit you are a lying piece of shit, you lying piece of shit.

    The administration was caught within the last two months listening in on American citizens with nothing to do with terrorism.

    All I have to do is cite the news.

    http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5987804&page=2

  • bill-tb

    I predict the song “Jive Talking” by the BeeGees is going to be very popular in 2009.

  • Neiman

    Lioncourt: What is your position on Separtion of Powers and Three Separate, equal branches of government? Is the President (Executive Branch) subservient to the Legislative and/or Judicial branches? If so, then surely that would suggest that we do not have Separtion of Powers or Three Separate but Equal branches of Government at all. If so, then why doesn’t the leader of Congress, the Third in Line to Succession, The Speaker of the House, have all the powers and position of Prime Minister, with Bush or now Obama only being a figurehead, a subservient position?

    Please explain!

  • ellinas

    First off, I’m not your buddy, beloved friend, or anything of the sort. Never have been, never will be.

    Bullwinkle on November 22, 2008 at 09:03 pm

    OK! Let’s try something different then.
    Bullwinkle sweetie! Honey lamb! I see that the mouth cleaner/wash I sent you is not working. Time for something stronger.

    Baby doll! You have a good night now!

  • http://www.myspace.com/thekingscourt4u Gman
  • ellinas

    Bullwinkle buddy. Beloved friend. I see that the mouth cleaner/wash I sent you is not working. Time for something stronger.

  • http://bullwinkleblog.com/ Bullwinkle

    Bullwinkle buddy. Beloved friend. I see that the mouth cleaner/wash I sent you is not working. Time for something stronger.

    – Lying piece of shit Marxist, Ellinas

    First off, I’m not your buddy, beloved friend, or anything of the sort. Never have been, never will be.

    I’d be your worst enemy if you rated it, you insignificant turd. You don’t.

    Secondly, I’d never put anything you ever sent me anywhere near my mouth and you never sent me anything. Saying you did is just another lie in a life-long series of lies.

    Third, if anyone needs to clean their mouth out it’s you. All that lying didn’t come from a clean mouth, did it?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development