Obama Caps Executive Pay At $500,000

Only for companies that took bailout money, but you can bet there will be efforts to use this precedent to dictate the compensation of private employees in the future.

President Barack Obama on Wednesday imposed a $500,000 cap on senior executive pay for the most distressed financial institutions receiving taxpayer bailout money and promised new steps to end a system of “executives being rewarded for failure.”
[...]
The limit would apply to top-paid executives at the most distressed financial institutions that are negotiating bailout agreements with the federal government.
It also would apply to other banks that receive aid, but they could get around the limits by publicizing to shareholders plans to exceed the salary cap.

Proof that Obama and his fellow liberals don’t plan just to stop with the companies that took bailouts:

The administration also will propose long-term compensation restrictions even for companies that don’t receive government assistance, Obama said.
Those proposals include:
• Requiring top executives at financial institutions to hold stock for several years before they can cash out.
• Requiring nonbinding “say on pay” resolutions — that is, giving shareholders more say on executive compensation.
• A Treasury-sponsored conference on a long-term overhaul of executive compensation.

Sounds ominous to me. Obama can get away with the cap he just signed today because, well, not a lot of people have any sympathy for the companies that took bailouts. They through themselves on the mercy of the government, and now they’re paying the price for inviting the government into their boardrooms. What they’re going to get is more meddling, more regulation and overall just plain more government control.
And to some extent, Obama probably can cap executive pay at bailed out companies to the extent that he can tie pay requirements to the TARP money. When you take government money you get the strings attached to that money as well. But how in the world is it going to be Constitutional for Obama to start dictating pay to private companies that have taken no bailout money at all?
While the class warriors may be salivating at the idea of punishing all those nasty over-achievers who have earned more than they have, do we really want to live in a country where the government can dictate to us how successful we can be?
What the employees of a given company – up to and including executives – get paid should be the business of the owners of that company. Whether the owner be an individual or stock holders or what have you.
It shouldn’t be up to the government to decide how much private sector employees get paid.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array robert108

    How is this different from Hitler running the German corporations?

  • Jason Chastain

    Can’t wait for Brian Williams and other NBC anchors to take a huge paycut now that GE (NBC) has taken bailout money. They already agree with paycuts and anything BO proposes, so what’s the delay?

  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin

    More economic micromanaging by government, which ruined the airline and auto industries, among others!

  • bill-tb

    Can we cap college professor’s pay?

  • NoJelly

    They will soon apply this to everyone, mark my words. I would still like to see the section of the constitution that grants them this power.

    The Saul Alinsky Plan marches on…

    Only thing is, it won’t apply to “everyone”. Elitist socialism doesn’t work that way…

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Rob,

    Education or lack thereof?

  • Almanack

    How can people actually be complaining that the government is looking to cap CEO salaries when they are giving these corporations billions of dollars free and clear.

    Yes, the corporations will figure out nice bonuses for these “capped” employees to circumvent the caps

  • SHADY

    Plaine and simple, the more the stinking government digs their communistic roots in the American companies and privite citizens, the more control they get!!

    That’s their ultimate goal. The extreme left wacko’s, it’s socialist, and communism = control!!

    Most people would’nt want their neighbor telling them what to do, but dems don’t mind the government telling them what they can or can’t do!!!

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    Obama is making Jimmy Carter look pretty good about now.

  • sayanything-4625

    Nothing good can come from this. They will soon apply this to everyone, mark my words. I would still like to see the section of the constitution that grants them this power.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    stfu, jerk

    Lead by example, Spark!

  • docdave

    These caps are just another form of price fixing and you know what happens when the government tries to fix prices. Supply goes down and you have scarcity like we did when Carter tried to fix gasoline prices. Another example is national health care which caps medical costs which results in a scarcity of medical facilities. Same principle applies to some degree with every commodity.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    You always know who they fear, by how they attack them.

    robert108 on January 28, 2009 at 07:29 am

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    What a dictator! I liked it when we used to live in a free country.

  • http://ezinearticles.com/?Hair-Removal-Cream-For-Men&id;=1623797 shuckle83

    As long as it’s only temporary i have no trouble with it. Soon as this depression starts to reverse this should be changed back.

  • http://ezinearticles.com/?Hair-Removal-Cream-For-Men&id;=1623797 shuckle83

    As long as it’s only temporary i have no trouble with it. Soon as this depression starts to reverse this should be changed back.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    It’s the clause allowing the spending for the general welfare. You can thank me for the education later.

    The fact that you think you’ve educated anyone shows how poor of an education you have.

  • robert108

    Where does Teleprompter Jesus get the suthority to do this? How will he enforce it?

  • http://northerngleaner.blogspot.com/ Gene

    I posted this same comment, same topic on the readers side.

    This is the Chicago Way, He’s true to his roots. I have a friend that borrowed money from the mob and didn’t pay them back. He washed up on the shores of Lake Michigan. No one knew he was going fishing. He wasn’t

    I once borrowed money from Valley Bank (this is a true story).

    About a quarter million for operating. My loan guy wanted operating statements every month. He got them.

    When we hit some hard times and we couldn’t pay him back on time he pointed out that the corporation was paying me, the CEO, about $75,000 a year. Once we became able to service out debt he demanded and we complied with a “REQUEST” that I cut my pay in half. They did.

    OR as we say in Illinois when these things happen after you borrow money from the mob, “You’re my bitch now, bitch”.

    Sorry for the crudity, as a minister I should be, but how is that different? They were piddling away money on my “Big” salary rather than pay the bank. Not good.

    So, when AIG or BofA “borrows” big money I as a taxpayer have every right to say, “You’re my bitch now, bitch” till they pay it all back with interest.

    This isn’t constitutional, like in the Godfather, It’s just business. At least that’s the Chicago Way. Oh, did you know Obama is from here. What do we expect?

  • docdave

    It’s the clause allowing the spending for the general welfare. You can thank me for the education later.

    You dumby, that is not in a clause but in the preamble which not a part of the constitution that delegates the powers given to the Federal government. Have you ever read the constitution?

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Well let’s see.. The “logic” here was that since the companies headed by the CEO’s were taking Federal Funding, the Fed’s could make a salary cap one of the necessary conditions for the funds being made available. Since most colleges and universities take Federal Funds, I see no reason why the same condition cannot be set for them as well.

    Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind…

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Fine! We’ll cap the salaries at $500,000 and then figure out some nice bonus or stock option plan to make up the difference.

    This is merely boob bait for the bubbas.

  • Lioncourt

    I would still like to see the section of the constitution that grants them this power.

    It’s the clause allowing the spending for the general welfare. You can thank me for the education later.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    It’s the clause allowing the spending for the general welfare. You can thank me for the education later.

    That’s the preamble.

    And apparently we can thank some unionized public school teacher for your education.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    bill-tb

    Can we cap college professor’s pay?

    stfu, jerk

    dont want a cap? move to australia. dont be a CEO. my assumption is merely that some other position will take its place, so that the new rhetoric can be escaped on semantic grounds.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Almanack, the answer to your question isn’t that we should, in fact, cap executive pay. The answer is that we shouldn’t be giving the corporations money in the first place.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development