Obama Adviser: Leave Troops In Iraq
Obama himself is calling for precipitous withdrawal of troops from Iraq, but Obama’s #1 policy guy on the Iraq issue is saying we should keep tens of thousands of troops in country and transition them to oversight mode.
A key adviser to Senator Obama’s campaign is recommending in a confidential paper that America keep between 60,000 and 80,000 troops in Iraq as of late 2010, a plan at odds with the public pledge of the Illinois senator to withdraw combat forces from Iraq within 16 months of taking office.”
“The paper, obtained by The New York Sun, was written by Colin Kahl for the center-left Center for a New American Security. In ‘Stay on Success: A Policy of Conditional Engagement,’ Mr. Kahl writes that through negotiations with the Iraqi government ‘the U.S. should aim to transition to a sustainable over-watch posture (of perhaps 60,000–80,000 forces) by the end of 2010 (although the specific timelines should be the byproduct of negotiations and conditions on the ground).’”
“Mr. Kahl is the day-to-day coordinator of the Obama campaign’s working group on Iraq. A shorter and less detailed version of this paper appeared on the center’s Web site as a policy brief.
For hawks, this probably comes as some relief. Obama apparently isn’t as stupid as he sounds when he’s busy pandering to the Code Pink/MoveOn.org crowd with rhetoric about ending the war and bringing the troops home immediately. The plan to transition troops from a primarily combat role to a role more supportive of rebuilding and training Iraqi forces is, frankly, pretty much what Bush and company have in mind. On the other hand, though, this has got to have the doves on the left scratching their heads. Is Obama lying to them? Is he saying one thing and doing another?
As with the Jeremiah Wright/James Meeks problems, this offers an insight into who Obama actually is that a lot of voters (this time on the left) probably aren’t going to like.












