Obama Phone Lady Says She Won’t Be Voting For The President Again In 2016

obamaphonelady

In what has to be a perfect storm of conspiracy-addled stupidity, the infamous “Obama phone” lady appeared with Alex Jones today and when asked who she plans on voting for in 2016 she says, with no small amount of smug satisfaction, that it sure as heck won’t be Obama.

The fact that she apparently doesn’t know anything about constitutional term limits (and the fact that Jones seems to think there’s a conspiracy to get rid of them) is hilarious enough, but my favorite part of the interview was when Jones said that people might be tracking her with her Obama phone.

She agreed, and said “They control you because they [only] give you so many minutes a month,” she says.

So, if the taxpayers don’t give this woman carte-blanche on her entitlement phone, she’s being controlled. And don’t try to tell her that nothing is stopping her from, you know, getting a job and buying her own phone and plan.

Rob Port is the editor of SayAnythingBlog.com. In 2011 he was a finalist for the Watch Dog of the Year from the Sam Adams Alliance and winner of the Americans For Prosperity Award for Online Excellence. In 2013 the Washington Post named SAB one of the nation's top state-based political blogs, and named Rob one of the state's best political reporters. He writes a weekly column for several North Dakota newspapers, and also serves as a policy fellow for the North Dakota Policy Council.

Related posts

  • http://Sayanythingblog.com The Whistler

    And don’t try to tell her that nothing is stopping her from, you know, getting a job and buying her own phone and plan.

    There is her stupidity.

    • borborygmi

      I think someone should ask her on why she doesn’t go get a job. And the answer is………

      • Spartacus

        ObamAA-‘s idea of a burgeoning economy. Thanks for asking.

  • Spartacus

    She’s typical of the low information voters that foisted ObamAA- on us.

  • mickey_moussaoui

    Would you hire her?

    • Spartacus

      Until now? The ObamAA- administration. Career killing move on her part, now she really will be eternally unemployed.

      • two_amber_lamps

        Hell, compared to some of Bamster’s $hit-show appointments she fits right in… she could probably run a department or perhaps get a cabinet position.

    • Hannitized, Proofs obsession

      You unwittingly make an argument that sailed right over your own head.

      We have created a society where everyone must participate in order to survive. Unfortunately, the reality is that not everyone is welcomed to participate, for various reasons. Worse, the system is not designed so that people can take care of themselves. When we have more and more people in this system who can not participate or are not permitted to participate, we have a problem.

      We have a problem. The biggest problem is that the system isn’t perfect and there’s a price for that, a price conservatives aren’t willing to pay.

      We (America) created it, you idiots.

      • $16179444

        you’re right, we do have a problem. its idiots like you that play the victim card. what price is there to pay? not all of us had mommy and daddy foot our bills so we could live in Hawaii and play holier than thou.

  • SigFan

    The picture perfect poster child for the Obama voter. Dumb as a stump and with her hand out.

    • Spartacus

      Your analogy aside, they’re not dumb, that implies they are mutes. They’re actually a most embarrassingly obnoxious and disgustingly boisterous branch of our species. Proof that the Gods must be crazy.

      • two_amber_lamps

        Proof the left is crazy since they co-opted them into a permanent underclass and are perfectly happy bleeding this nation dry so as to facilitate that stump’s permanent vacation.

  • OTA Mom

    Am I missing something… why at all are we providing welfare for people who are perfectly able bodied and capable enough to provide for themselves? She doesn’t look disabled. ~sigh~

    • $16179444

      she’s black…..she is a ‘victim’

      • $8194357

        A marxist social justice victim…
        But everyone is trained to clap and bark like seals
        its the evil conservitives and republicans.

  • nimrod

    Why would anyone want to track her?

  • http://flamemeister.com flamemeister

    There is no conspiracy to get rid of term limits, it has been openly discussed among Democrats for at least three years under this Regime, and before that under FDR—probably other times as well. It has probably even been discussed by Republicans. It’s pretty much always part of political stink.

    • Spartacus

      If I remember correctly, and I’m sure I do (the residual effects of the illicit drugs I had to use to put up with the Carter administration had exceeded the lifespan of their flash back capability), it was discussed among democrats during the last 3 years of Clinton’s stint in office. Then, for some reason, they dropped the subject for 8 years only to bring it up about 3 years ago again. It appears to be a cyclical cause they pursue.

      • $8194357

        The internationalist owned incorperated government wants
        a consistant platform and message…Chavez is the perfect excample.

    • borborygmi

      Definitely was discussed for President Reagan
      . I like how conservatives like to pick their Amendments. This one is good this one should be abolished. You know as Amendments they weren’t part of the Founding Fathers wishes.

      • Spartacus

        I don’t remember that. It must have been discussed amongst Democrats privately when they were really believed the Mondale/Ferraro ticket was the ultimate ticket ::snicker::

      • http://flamemeister.com flamemeister

        No, Not all of them, of course. What’s your point? Are we now having a Meaningless Comment contest. Let me throw “Buy low, sell high” at you & see if you can handle it.

      • Hal109

        Yes, it was discussed after Reagan won 49 of 50 states, he was truly a bipartisan President.

  • jl

    Anyone looking for the definition of a “low information voter” needs to look no more.

    • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com Goon

      The woman has an IQ of 80 if she is lucky.

      • two_amber_lamps

        I’d say on the IQ scale she’s somewhere between head cheese and a toaster oven.

        • camsaure

          Qualified Liberal then?

          • two_amber_lamps

            And then some… overqualified at that.

        • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com Goon

          She’s the poster woman for go to work and pay your taxes because 100,000,000’s of people need you to pay your taxes so the sick, lame and the lazy can have their Obama phones and welfare.

          • two_amber_lamps

            Geee… thanks for the motivation Goon. Maybe I’ll just stay home for the rest of my life and watch The Price is Right and collect a govt stipend.

            Oh, but wait…. what would be the difference between myself and Tranny, gurgle, Big Suck, the pederast, and the rest of the liberal douchers that have burrowed into this blog like f$$%^ing ticks?

            Forget it…… I’d rather starve than be like those morbidly obese leeches.

        • yy4u2

          I’d rather have both of those in my home than an 0bamma voter. At least they are both useful. Ha

  • ellinas1

    Colin Powell: Republicans “Still Look Down On Minorities”
    By Rob Port on January 13 2013

    http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/colin-powell-republicans-still-look-down-on-minorities/

    Enough said.

  • PK

    “and the fact that Jones seems to think there’s a conspiracy to get rid of them[term limits]”
    There’s a bill introduced by Rep. Jose Serrano to eliminate the 22nd Amendment. I think Michelle has a job currently, at least she said she did. And Jones was talking about the fact that your cell phones can be tracked in real-time and the microphones and video cameras can be activated remotely. They can be used to spy on you, and when everything’s run through NSA servers to protect us from terrorists, is it wrong to question if the government is using this technology illegally? And not just the government, private companies help make up the intelligence community. Couldn’t this be abused? Your entire post makes me think you didn’t listen to any more of the interview than what’s in this little 2 minute clip. Why not listen to the whole interview before sending out insults?

  • chris

    Speaking of stupid people, you guys keep eating the bullshit that they shovel you. The fact is, there is no “obamaphone” entitlement for minorities. The government program in question is one that had started in the mid 1990s to help out low income customers have access to basic phone service. People who qualify still have to pay but just at a discount price, poor white people benefit from the program as much as poor minorities. and, best of all, the Obama administration has nothing to do with any of this.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2012/09/28/crazy-for-obama-phones-but-are-they-for-real/

    That lady in the youtube video was obviously confused about a few things, but it doesn’t excuse you guys for being just as stupid.

    • $16179444

      big difference buttercup – back then people didn’t feel ENTITLED to them. I know, big word – look it up

  • factsarefacts

    I agree with her.

    I’m not voting for him either in 2016.

  • awfulorv

    Far as I can tell our media began their slide into silliness, and obfuscation, by not informing their readers of Roosevelt’s physical status during the thirties. It continued, during World War ll, with their attempts to destroy Patton. Then there was the Atom Bomb argument, should we, or should we not, have used it? And related to that issue, the sob stories about the, traitorous, Rosenbergs. Picking up speed, the media next visited integration, and painting the entire South with an, unfair, broad brush. Then came the assassinations and the convoluted media efforts to blame conservatives, when the perpetrator of one of the acts was an avowed Marxist/Communist, and another, an Islamic Jihadist whose political leanings, to this day, like the Fort Hood killer, remain, deliberately, obfuscated. More recently has come the Watergate affair, a two bit burglary, which has become the “Greatest Affront to Democracy” in the minds of the, childlike, gossips. We were then informed, and told to empathize with, the SID Mothers when, to many, they appeared to be opportunistic child killers. Then came the accelerators sticking on cars, conveniently, not government owned vehicles, BTW. And lately, with the election of the first Black president, the floodgates have opened. Dogs on car rooftops, cancerous deaths of wives, Sandra Flukes, Tim Tebow stories, and now another bizzarre story of the Mormon linebacker from No Dames. Next week who knows? If I had to guess it would be that George bush is somehow involved in the death of Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro.

Top