this is another area where the church types piss me off. people should be allowed to look at boobs if they want to look at boobs.

plus, are not the ‘pubs the ones that say we need to bring personal responsibility into the mix again? so, if you dont want kids looking at girl parts, WATCH YOUR KIDS.

yes, but who really rails against boobs and other exposed girl parts? i never seen the ‘atheists for morality’ group picketing the local strip club.

The owners of Facebook for one. Parents for another.

The vast majority of Americans, including athiests, don’t want naked people in the public square.

You took an unneccessary shot at Christians and won’t say “OK, party foul”. Poor form.

That’s rather ironic given the author of this post.

Yea. No kidding.

Greetings:

Several times (maybe many) back in the joy of my youth, I remember my father telling me, “Boy-o, there’s a difference between a reason and an excuse; an excuse is a bad reason.”

It seems these ladies were deprived of this lesson.

There are several fallacies among the assertions being put forth. The most obvious being that if you want to breast feed your child, you have to do it everywhere and every time. I think there may just be alternatives in this, the Age of Obama.

Another implicit fallacy is that public breast-feeding is not something of a maternal compulsion, along the lines of the panty-less Britney or the Paris Hilton sex tapes. Look at me, I’m breast-feeding in public! Look at me, I’m a loving mommy!

Udderly ridiculous

Moo? Breast feeding will get you compared to a cow?

this is another area where the church types piss me off. people should be allowed to look at boobs if they want to look at boobs.

Who says it’s church types?

If you want to look at boobs, go to a porno site. Facebook has a clear policy, which you know when you sign into it. It’s a friends and family site, not a show naked pictures of yourself site.

I’m tired of people rejecting to common sense as “church stuff” or “religious zealotry”.

What an udderly ridiculous thing to complain about. It really sucks! I hope this post will nip this trend right in the bud. Sorry! I am out of control.

I breast-fed 2 kids, all4 of the grandkids are breatfed, 1 still is, and all were fed until about the age of one. I just looked through my kid pics and could not find but 1 pic in all that time that was a bf pic, and it was my daughter, and she has nothing showing, except a big old baby head. I think it’s cool if you want to show your titties, if u are into that, but how hard would it be to make, or there probably is one, join a nursing mother site, or club, or whatever? Then you could just have a titapalooza, and no one would care. Facebook I think is right here. Their site,Their rules. Why would these mothers want some little 13 y old boys yanking off to their nursing photos, anyway? Or, at least I hope that that is the only group that would do it.

If you want to look at boobs, go to a porno site. Facebook has a clear policy, which you know when you sign into it. It’s a friends and family site, not a show naked pictures of yourself site.

i was talking about things like this in general.

to your point; i agree, if she does not like it, dotn use facebook. nobody has the ‘right’ to use that site.

Now I can attach a name to all of the “exhibitionist” pictures that my wife and I have endured in parenting classes…my wife and I have always shaken our heads and wondered what kind of woman wants to have a picture of her breast shown to the whole world, and now we know.

A serious exhibitionist named Kelli Roman is one of them, apparently.

I don’t see why the shot was necessary at the religious.

yes, but who really rails against boobs and other exposed girl parts? i never seen the ‘atheists for morality’ group picketing the local strip club.

Dear Kelli;

Breastfeeding is like taking a dump. We all do it, but I don’t want to look at your butt or your boob. Could you not have propped your daughter up on your lap for a nice photo that showed the baby’s face? Changing a baby’s sh*tty diaper is also very natural and people do it public restrooms, etc, but you sure don’t see photos of that. Gee Kelly, why don’t you a flash your baby girl’s poopy bottom as you wipe it clean – I mean come ON, looking back, it’s hard for me to remember a time when I wasn’t changing one of my kids’ diapers every hour of the day, but shock, there are no photos of that!!!

Kelli’s position seems like a trailer-trashy perception of “I’m so proud of me.” Like everything else in this world, if people have a “right” to do something, they interpret it as a right to shove it into everyone else’s faces.

i was talking about things like this in general.
to your point; i agree, if she does not like it, dotn use facebook. nobody has the ‘right’ to use that site.

Well, but at the same time, you point to a maligned crowd when a stupid woman disobeys the very obvious rules.

I don’t see why the shot was neccessary at the religious.