Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, July 21, 2008

North Dakota’s Two New Ethanol Plants Have Already Eaten Up Nearly $2 Million In State Subsidies

Why are they being subsidized?  Because high corn prices have made it hard to make money from ethanol.

North Dakota’s two newest ethanol factories have collected $1.78 million in state subsidies during the past six months, in part because high corn prices have made it difficult to profit from selling the alternative fuel.

From October through March, Blue Flint Ethanol of Underwood has received $901,521 in subsidies, state Department of Commerce records show. Red Trail Energy LLC of Richardton got $877,725 during the same six-month period.

Both factories, which are capable of producing about 50 million gallons of ethanol annually, have been operating for less than 18 months. Red Trail began making fuel in January 2007 while Blue Flint started manufacturing ethanol the following month.

So where are the subsidies coming from?  The farmers.

The subsidy fund is financed by a share of state registration fees on farm vehicles and a portion of North Dakota’s tax on agricultural fuel.

Just so we have this straight, we’re making farming more expensive with taxes to subsidize ethanol plants that would shut their doors if not subsidized by the state despite being heavily subsidized already from the federal level.

And before anyone claims that the ethanol plants benefit the farmers let’s remember that not all farmers grow fuel crops.

According to the article our political leaders are questioning whether or not voters would go along with an expansion of subsidies for these plants.  At a time when that same political leadership is opposing any real and meaningful tax relief in the state out of fear that they might not have enough to spend, the idea that they would pour more subsidies into a biofuel that hasn’t been marketable once in the over three decades its been in existence is ridiculous.

Its make or break time for ethanol.  Either the biofuel industry stands on its own two feet or it goes the way of other business ventures that can’t turn a profit on their own but aren’t so politically well-connected to survive on the backs of the taxpayers.

Comments

I agree wholeheartedly. The whole ethanol scam will finally be revealed when the fuel doesn’t sell and the farmers and investors are broke. But then congressmen from the ethanol states will come up with a taxpayer financed plan to bail them out. Yah. You betcha.

watashiwa on July 21, 2008 at 11:12 am

w: You have just succinctly stated why govt should never be involved in business.  Good on you.


If life doesn’t begin at conception, why do they call it birth control?

robert108 on July 21, 2008 at 11:17 am

This is not only a government program, but one that the Democrats full-heartedly got behind.

It didn’t take long to crash and burn. This is the “change” that the Democrat candidate talks about = government programs fail faster than they normally do.

likwidshoe on July 21, 2008 at 06:30 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.