North Dakota’s Oil Boom Isn’t Going Away

An estimate of the amount of easily-exploitable oil in North Dakota has been upgraded by several hundred million barrels.

BISMARCK, N.D. — North Dakota’s easily recoverable oil reserves have jumped 41 percent, which state regulators hope will strengthen the case for long-term industry investment in the state’s oil patch.
A new analysis by the state Industrial Commission’s oil and gas division estimated the state’s proven reserves at 550 million barrels. Geologists say there is a 90 percent probability that amount of oil can be pumped from western North Dakota, given current economic conditions.
The division’s director, Lynn Helms, said the agency continuing to work on other estimates of probable oil reserves that are less likely to be produced.

The U.S. Department of Energy, acting through its Energy Information Administration, had the amount of proven reserves in ND at 389 million barrels, so this is a significant increase over that. The Department of Energy number was for 2004, but a spokesmen for the group said that their estimate for reserves in North Dakota is likely to come up in their 2005 assessment as well.

Gary Long, a petroleum engineer in the Energy Information Administration’s division office in Dallas, said the federal agency’s numbers are updated annually. Its report on 2005 reserves is to be published this fall, and he expects its North Dakota estimate on proven reserves will rise.

State Democrats, always eager to find a way around the economic boom North Dakota has enjoyed under the leadership of Gov. John Hoeven and other Republicans, have said that high gas prices have propped up the state economy and that the boom will only last as long as the high prices do. They have used this as an excuse to avoid tax cuts in the face of high state tax receipts and massive budget surplus. Unfortunately for them (but good for North Dakota as a whole), it appears as though gas prices will have little impact on the exploitability of North Dakota oil reserves.

Helms said the reserve estimate was nudged upward by rising oil prices. But even if prices crash, he does not expect the 550-million-barrel proven reserve estimate to drop more than 5 to 10 percent, he said.

Going forward North Dakota should have a policy of being highly cooperative with the oil industry. Increased domestic production of oil in places like North Dakota will help make this country less reliant upon foreign oil, not to mention the economic benefits North Dakota communities will enjoy as a consequence.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array Blake

    Apparently reserves are so high that all of the oil in ND cannot get to market and the big operators are paying their royalty owners (state and federal governments) and interest partners only $ 40 per barrel.  We are awash in oil. If the NYMEX price is $ 70 per barrel, what accounts for the thirty dollar differential? Where and to whom does that go? I think the State of ND  and the federal Minerals Service is being taken for a ride on that one.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Well if there are more lucrative ways for truckers to make money than
    hauling oil in the oil patch then the truckers should look into that.

    Maybe they should do some long-haul trucking instead.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    So what you’re saying that because of higher oil prices that it’s more economical to develop North Dakota’s oil assets?

    The amount of proven reserves in North Dakota would be 272 years worth of production from the Velva biodiesel plant. 

  • texasmom

    Speaking from the point of view as a trucking organization. The truckers don’t get paid enough. I’ve been there and done that. Yes the money is good, but the expenses of running the company that is trucking the crude oil is double, sometimes triple what the company/driver is paid. I realize that the oil is on the persons land and they should get something, but come on. They are made into millionairs while the little people do the hard work.

  • Bat One

    Not only has the price of crude escalated, but the tecnology for recovery of that oil is significantly better today than when those first estimates of recoverable reserves were first offered.

    Besides all that, when was the last time we heard from an authoritative, reputable source say that the crude oil reserves at a particular site were actually less than what had been first estimated?  I can’t think of a single such instance.  We are awash in oil reserves.  And at $3.00 per barrel, we are presented with the opportunity to develop both the laternative enegery sources we will need down the road, and the substantial oil reserves still available to us.  All we have to do is recognize and accpet the price we will have to pay to do so.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    If the NYMEX price is $ 70 per barrel, what accounts for the thirty dollar differential?

    I don’t know but extraction, trucking, profit, extraction taxes all spring to mind as expenses that also have to be paid. 

  • sayanything-4124

    Plus, from what I understand, the cost of fracking alone is astounding

  • sayanything-4124

    Ummm, it is their land. These are ranchers and farmers who worked and still do work their rears off *before* they signed mineral rights contracts, why should they be told to be happy to get *something* on THEIR land? Alot of this land has been in families for generations, and they worked the land before the oil and will work the land after. It is theirs to do with as they please.

    They don’t have to allow any exploring and drilling, in which case, the truckers get a big fat nothing.

    btw, they ARE the little people. They are not J.R. Ewing(sp?) living on South Fork. They still ranch and farm everyday. Not much changes for them, except they get a new pick-up truck, update their equipment, put money aside for their kids and grandkids to go to school.

    I live in oil country and live where neighbors have allowed drilling. You would have no idea that they came into any money except for the new Ford pick-up.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    greedy truckers, they should take TexasMom’s concern about the little guy to
    heart and haul the oil to the needy consumers for nothing.

  • sayanything-4124

    It is like saying the truck driver goes into the liquor store, buys a lottery ticket, and they should only get *some* of the winnings, since the “little guy” did all the work selling it to them. Forget the fact that the truck driver *was* the little guy until he checked his lottery numbers. Now, however he is a greedy person trying to squash the little liquor store clerk under his heel.

    Amazing.

  • sayanything-4625

    NYMEX price is $ 70 per barrel

    Like most commodities, not all barrels of oil are created equal. The $70 is for light, sweet crude oil. The highest grade. As the quality of the oil goes down, the price people are willing to pay goes down. That could be a factor here.

  • sayanything-1317

    So the trucker gets a third of the money and that’s not enough? That’s pretty damned arrogant to assume that you deserve the lionshare of the money.

  • Jog 1

    blah, blah, blah

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development