Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

North Dakota Tuition Relief is Only For University Employees’ Families

I’m late to the party on this one but...

December 14, 2007

Dear UND Campus Community:

I am pleased to announce that beginning in the fall of 2008, spouses and dependents of University of North Dakota benefitted faculty and staff will be eligible for a 50% tuition waiver.  This initiative will benefit many of our dedicated faculty and staff.

Charles E. Kupchella
President

There is nothing unusual or unfair about a business giving a discount to it’s employees.  It’s a way to reward your workers without costing a bunch of money as well as a way to get the team to buy into the services the company (or organization) is producing.

However I think given the tuition increases we’ve seen in recent years this is the wrong policy at the wrong time.

For those of you that have noticed tuition has skyrocketed at the University of North Dakota.  (And at other state schools as well).  I guess everyone’s got a theory on who’s most to blame.  It’s true that some of the earlier tuition rises were because of state budget cuts.  However the last legislative session opened up the pocketbook and tuition STILL went up.  The Univeristy plans to double law school tuition, because they can.  The State Board of Higher Education is asking for a 50% increase in funding next year (on top of the 20% they got last year) and said they’d try to control tuition increases. 

The problem of skyrocketing tuition isn’t just happening here in the state, but I think we’re hurting as much as anyone.

This is why I think that cutting a break to the faculty and staff is the wrong thing to do.  If we’re going to somehow reign in spending and tuition hikes it’s going to be twice as hard when the faculty and staff are immune to most of the problem.  It’s not an unreasonable thought to imagine that Kupchella instituted this break because he was tired of hearing people on the inside of the university complain about how much college is costing them.

North Dakota’s faculty probably isn’t as bad as most places but I don’t think they have a clue about what life is like in the real world.  They need to understand what it’s like to have an 8-6 job where they work 250 days a year.  They need to know that they aren’t entitled to a raise because some schlump in New York makes more money than they do.  They need to know that it’s not about what it says on your degree, it’s about what you produce.  The need to realize that their good fortune works out to someone elses’s bad fortune when it comes to money from the state.

This new policy by The University of North Dakota is just adding another floor to the Ivory Tower.  If we can’t all live up there than why should anyone?

Comments

Whistler, I don’t disagree that it’s a poor move to make this announcement in the face of increased funding demands from the state.  The problem, though, is that in order to keep competitive with other schools (who often give a 100% tuition break to faculty and staff), they need to offer a benefit like this to stay competitive in the job market and to keep their employees from jumping ship.  Especially in the face of an increased presence of online teaching options for faculty (full disclosure: I work for an online college in a staff capacity), tuition breaks are an expected benefit.

It’s not unlike the question that gets asked of a lot of North Dakota Republicans seeking office: ‘will you eschew out-of-state contributions to ensure that you’re representing the state’s citizens’ interests?’ Well, if they do, they put themselves at a distinct disadvantage if their competitors don’t make the same commitment.

Ideologically, I agree with you, but practically, it’s the right move by Kupchella.  Failure to offer what’s (unfortunately?) considered a standard university benefit would erode the quality of employees the university could attract.

sonofasillyperson on May 14, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Avatar for The Whistler

That’s true that an huge driver pushing education up is a nationwide trend.  But this is a problem.

The Whistler on May 14, 2008 at 01:32 pm
Avatar for brad

I heard today that UND has to cut 2 million in academic spending??  but it has nothing to do with moving to D1

brad on May 14, 2008 at 01:49 pm

Since this is the same bunch that believes everything is a zero sum proposition; who will be charged 50% more in tuition to make up the loss?

Kevin on May 14, 2008 at 02:16 pm

The Whistler, it sounds as though you don’t believe in the “magic of the marketplace”. If they can raise fees and get a net increase in revenue, then their previous fees were too low. Supply and demand you see.

If you think that somehow tuition fees should be at a “sensible” (as defined by you or some other, but not the market) level, then you’re a statist/socialist/economic-populist.

By saying that faculty need to work more, like from 8am-6pm, and 250 days a year, sounds a little like Marx’s labor theories. Someone living off a return on investment, like interest or dividends, is getting income with no labor. Why shouldn’t a faculty member? Isn’t he simply doing the same, but their “investment” is their knowledge. It takes considerable effort to become a master of a field of knowledge.

Also, many of faculty work more like 8am-8pm, and later (and my supervisor has been working to 1am recently, and in on both days of the weekends, I know because I am there too). Sounds like you’re a lazy part-timer, only 8-6, 5 days a week, damn that’d be nice, it’d be like a holiday.  smile


“All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting.”
“Every war when it comes, or before it comes, is represented not as a war but as an act of self-defense against a homicidal maniac.” —George Orwell

Anarchist Vegetarian on May 14, 2008 at 08:09 pm

The Whistler, it sounds as though you don’t believe in the “magic of the marketplace”.

“Higher education” is a monopoly, shielded from market forces.

Kevin on May 14, 2008 at 08:14 pm

With hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies.

But pull the subsidies and let them compete on the market.  Perhaps help students directly rather than funneling it through the schools if you want to help kids out.

But what we are doing is not working.

Some college faculty work hard, many don’t.  The hard workers are probably worth more in a free market.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on May 14, 2008 at 08:23 pm

Why is that Kevin? There are some 20,000 universities and community colleges, plus there are plenty of other countries that happily take American students and often cheaper fees too. With such choice, how can you claim there is a monopoly?

The EU has announced they’ll be throwing a few billion at PhD and post-doc. scholarships. I know I’ll be applying soon.


“All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting.”
“Every war when it comes, or before it comes, is represented not as a war but as an act of self-defense against a homicidal maniac.” —George Orwell

Anarchist Vegetarian on May 14, 2008 at 08:25 pm

The billions of dollars nationwide (as opposed to my ND number) tends to keep private competition out.

I think the EU’s doing this will not catch them up with our spending.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on May 14, 2008 at 08:28 pm

If you think that somehow tuition fees should be at a “sensible” (as defined by you or some other, but not the market) level, then you’re a statist/socialist/economic-populist.

You’re sounding more like a real anarchist all the time.

Ken McCracken on May 14, 2008 at 08:30 pm

The EU has announced they’ll be throwing a few billion at PhD and post-doc. scholarships. I know I’ll be applying soon.

I’m not surprised. Heaven forbid you have to earn a living in the private sector!
Good luck with your continuation of “playing school.”
Enjoy European socialism, cramped quarters and warm beer.

Kevin on May 14, 2008 at 08:30 pm

AV,

If you are going to invoke free market economics into the discussion about higher education, then perhaps the very first consideration should be to eliminate the blatant disincentive called tenure.

Just about everyone has known teachers (not “educators") who are hard working and devoted first and foremost to their students.  I’ve known a few too.  But if you’re running a fruit stand, mixing good apples and bad is never a good idea.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on May 14, 2008 at 08:31 pm

Ken, that I’d take a government handout to do research shows I’ve got a price where I’ll happily abandon any silly belief system. Being poor and idealistic sorta sux.  smile

Bat One, tenure has issues, but atleast it gives protection to outspoken individuals, like Noam Chomsky or Alan Dershowitz. (One of these two is a lying piece of crap, and best he opens his mouth and proves himself a fool, but maybe he is good at teaching law.)

The govt pressuring universities to fire staff it didn’t like would be a little too much like China.

Whistler, maybe a voucher system for universities would make them try harder?


“All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting.”
“Every war when it comes, or before it comes, is represented not as a war but as an act of self-defense against a homicidal maniac.” —George Orwell

Anarchist Vegetarian on May 14, 2008 at 08:51 pm

Ken, that I’d take a government handout to do research shows I’ve got a price where I’ll happily abandon any silly belief system. Being poor and idealistic sorta sux.

I don’t blame you one bit, and if the government offers it, and you are entitled to it, take it.

That does not necessarily compromise your principles.

Ken McCracken on May 14, 2008 at 08:54 pm

Being poor and idealistic sorta sux. 

Only to those who can’t link the two.

Kevin on May 14, 2008 at 08:56 pm

...if the government offers it, and you are entitled to it, take it.

Ken,

My, what an exquisitely sneaky left hook.  No wonder he never saw it coming!


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on May 14, 2008 at 09:00 pm

I’d like to think Marvin Hagler would approve.

Ken McCracken on May 14, 2008 at 09:16 pm
Avatar for M WAHEED JADOON

Dear Friend

There are some people out there who want to declare this race over now, before all the ballots have been counted or even cast. There are some who say they don’t know why I’m in this race. So let me tell you why I’m still running.

I’m in this race for everyone who needs a champion. For the hardworking families who are losing sleep over gas prices and grocery costs and mortgage payments and medical bills—but who never lose that American can-do spirit and optimism.

I’m in this race for the more than 16 million people like you who have supported me—for the people who have put their hearts into winning this race. You never gave up on me, and I’ll never give up on you.

We are in the homestretch. After sixteen months, there are only three weeks left to compete in the final contests. With your help I’m going to keep fighting until every last American has a chance to be heard, and as we learned last night in West Virginia, I know we can win.

Contribute now to keep our campaign going strong.

I’m also in this race because I have the best chance of beating John McCain in November and putting America on the right track.

We proved something in West Virginia last night—a state every Democratic president has won since 1916. And we proved something in a few other battleground states that have a history of picking presidents. Pennsylvania. Ohio. Arkansas. New Hampshire. New Jersey. New Mexico. Nevada. And, yes, Michigan and Florida.

I am in this race, and so are you, because we both know the stakes in this election are too high to stay on the sidelines.

So let’s keep going together, you and me. Let’s keep driving our campaign forward, and let’s keep winning.

Make a contribution today to help me win.

I want to thank you again for the incredible generosity of spirit you have shown over the course of this campaign. Together, you and I are going to make history.

Thank you,

Hillary Rodham Clinton

WORLD DEMOCRACY MEDIA GROUP
M WAHEED JADOON

M WAHEED JADOON on May 15, 2008 at 12:16 am

However the last legislative session opened up the pocketbook and tuition STILL went up.

There is a logical reason for this.  Once the schools have more money, they use it to attract more students.  With more students, they need more infrastructure.  More infrastructure means that they need more money,hence increased tuition.

It will only get worse.  As money increases, the schools will start lowering admissions standards to attract more students.  By doing that, they will need more remedial courses for the marginal students they admit.  That means they need more money.

It’s a racket.


"Although I can accept talking scarecrows, lions and great wizards in emerald cities, I find it hard to believe there is no paperwork involved when your house lands on a witch.”
- Dave James

Steve L. on May 15, 2008 at 06:08 am

Regarding the University of North Dakota they’ve pretty much stabilized the population (and raised admission standards).


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on May 15, 2008 at 06:25 am
Avatar for REHANA KHATOON

Dear FRIENDS,

Have you seen the general election polls lately? They consistently show that we’ll beat John McCain in November. In a national head-to-head match and in the critical swing states, the numbers show I’m the best candidate to take back the White House for Democrats.

That is why it’s critical that we stay in this race and keep fighting for every last vote. We can win the nomination if we extend our popular vote lead, and that means putting everything we have into the final races. With just a few days before the voters in Puerto Rico head to the polls, our campaign is working hard—and your support is making the difference.

Every vote matters. I need you to help today and join our matching program. When you give today, a supporter will match your contribution and double its impact,

Contribute today to have twice the impact on the final primary races.

In the past 24 hours, thousands of you have given generously to our campaign, and I’m so delighted to see your incredible commitment.

With your help, we’re going to keep driving forward to victory, and there’s no better time to help than right now. By making a contribution today, you’ll double your impact when your gift is matched.

Contribute today, and your gift will be matched.

Thank you for putting your heart and spirit into this campaign. I couldn’t do it without you.

Sincerely,

Hillary Rodham Clinton

FRIEND OF HILLARY CLINTON
M WAHEED JADOON
WORLD DEMOCRACY MEDIA GROUP
NEW YORK

REHANA KHATOON on May 29, 2008 at 03:28 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.