Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, September 22, 2008


North Dakota Policy Council Responds To Soros-Funded Measure 2 Critics

The North Dakota Policy Council has rebutted the George Soros-sponsored Center on Budget and Policy Priorities report opposing state ballot measure 2 (my response to the report is here).

Here’s an excerpt:

The argument goes that the state can “afford” Measure 2 right now because of high oil prices and high agriculture commodity prices but that if it passes the state will “lose” over $400 million of dollars of revenue. When the economy slows and our schools will lose electricity.

The fact is that the $400 million that CBPP mentioned is money that is not currently appropriated to spend. It’s not money that was supposed to go to schools or other programs. It’s money that the state has never had to spend. In other words, it’s a surplus. Passing Measure 2 would be as if the state never had the money.

The second argument goes that the income tax is the wrong tax to cut. They make the case that the state should cut property taxes or the state sales tax. Here again, the left (and many on the right for that matter) believes that the state can actually cut property taxes.

That last point about property taxes is particularly apt.  Governor Hoeven’s administration has been trying in vain to propose a plan from the state level that would ease local property taxes, but so far all they’ve managed to do is make the state’s tax code more complicated through a confusing property tax buy-down scheme.  Ultimately, property tax reform has to come from the local level.  And that’s not going to happen until North Dakotans start holding the local officials responsible for the spending that’s driving high property taxes accountable.

Here’s another interesting point about the tax cuts debate in North Dakota: Both candidates for Governor, including incumbent Republican John Hoeven and Democrat challenger Tim Mathern, have proposed tax cuts that are far costlier than Measure 2 would be.  Mathern’s plan, in fact, has tax rate cuts as high as 75% which are significantly higher than the 50% proposed by Measure 2.

So it’s hilarious for the CBPP to descend on North Dakota from Washington DC and suggest that the state doesn’t need income tax relief when clearly our candidates for Governor from both parties know which way the political winds are blowing.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Avatar for Senator Tim Mathern

A clarification. In the Mathern plan the 75% applies to the first bracket and 50% to the second bracket. These do not apply to the other brackets. These are the folks that need the money and will spend the money in North Dakota. Senator Tim Mathern

Senator Tim Mathern on September 22, 2008 at 09:53 pm
Rob
Rob
22123 comments
Send a private message

Thanks for the clarification, Senator.  I did note in the post that your plan had “tax cuts as high as 75%.”  It wasn’t my intention to suggest that your proposal had 75% across-the-board cuts.

I think it is interesting to note, though, that your cuts are less expensive in terms of lost revenue than Measure 2’s cuts.


The purpose of government shouldn’t be to do good, but simply to refrain from doing evil.

Rob on September 22, 2008 at 09:59 pm

Who decides whether someone “needs” to keep more of their income?2eoab2b.jpg


No Free Lunch
25i20w9.jpg

Kevin on September 23, 2008 at 10:25 am

Rob, I’m sure you will correct your headline to read: “Koch Oil barons North Dakota Policy Council…..

Puzzlefeet on September 23, 2008 at 04:50 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.