I believe the Forum needs to be shown up for the liberal rag it has become.

This is an issue that requires direct communication.

No letters to the editors. Blogstorm them.

Several of the writers on SA have their own blogs. Me included.

Time to take them to task for the open warfare they have commenced against Sarah Palin with outright lies and fabrications.

Believe me, the world reads this stuff and if enough say enough there will be ink (not blood).

The Forum’s not worth using to line a bird cage anymore.

A recent Rasmussen Survey discovered that by a 10 to 1 margin, the public believes that the media is trying to hurt Sara Palin. In other words 10 out of 11 people polled believe the media is trying to hurt Sara Palin. The Forum would have to be included in this group. It’s sad.

Ahlin’s argument is one of emotion, not logic. The real debate is not over whether or not 14 year olds should be forced to bear the children of rape (how many women even get pregnant from rape in a given year? It’s got to be an astronomically low number).

Here ya go Rob.

“”The rape-related pregnancy rate among women of reproductive age was 5 percent per rape or 6 percent per victim. From these data, it can be estimated that 32,101 rape-related pregnancies may occur each year among American women over the age of 18 years.”"

And that’s a very generous estimate. I’ve heard estimates as low as 1 percent.

What many emotionally charged arguments pushed forward by pro-abortion (I refuse to call it pro-choice) lobbyists and legislators fail to realize, is that a pregnancy is not some mechanical procedure that consistently follows the same set of simple rules. There is a complex cocktail of hormones in a womans body that have to reach precise levels for the woman to retain pregnancy, and emotional and physical trauma upset those hormones (which is why prengancy per rape statistics are so low).

I sent e-mails to Ahlin and Zaleski about their articles. Ahlin’s was full of every inuendo and liberal left ravings. Zaleski took a shot at Palin because he made an unfavorable report on Obama–so to be fair he had to put in a shot at Sarah.
I think we ought to encourage the left wing nuts and Dems to keep shooting off their mouth–they are helping voters see what nutcases they really are.

I’m tired of seeing this dopey criticism about Palin:

A candidate — who would have a 14-year-old child raped by her stepfather or even her own father, forced to carry a pregnancy through to term and go through childbirth — is “proud” of her daughter’s “decision.” (Do they teach irony in “abstinence only” classes?)

There is no irony there because her daughter does have the decision in her hands. What we have in Palin is a woman who is pro-life recognizing that the law says that Bristol can make the decision to abort. She, in turn, praises her daughter Bristol for keeping the baby.

What, about that situation, shows any irony whatsoever?

Do they teach logic in “journalism” classes? Apparently not.

Let’s keep the focus on the topic which is “the smearing of Palin by the forum”. What does pro-life or abortion have to do with this topic?

who would have a 14-year-old child raped by her stepfather or even her own father, forced to carry a pregnancy through to term and go through childbirth

I’m tired of seeing that argument myself. Rape is a terrible thing, and getting pregnant from a rape is even worse. But why does that justify murdering the child?

What did the unborn child do?

Ahlin’s argument is one of emotion, not logic. The real debate is not over whether or not 14 year olds should be forced to bear the children of rape (how many women even get pregnant from rape in a given year? It’s got to be an astronomically low number). The debate over abortion is over when life begins.

And logic, not to mention science, tells us that life begins at conception and is a continuum of growth and development until the time of death.

Which should come from natural causes, not a doctor wielding the implements of abortion.