Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

North Dakota Democrats Hitting Republicans On Government Spending

Mitch Vance, the Democrat candidate for North Dakota State Treasurer, issued a press release today hitting state Republicans on goverment spending.

Here’s the key graph:

“This may come as a revelation to some,” Vance reports, “but in 2007, 14.1 cents of every dollar in personal income in North Dakota went to fund state and local government. Based on the data, North Dakotans deserve at least a $275 rebate or credit.” Vance’s research provides the price of government as a percentage of personal income for the years 1998-2007. The data for 2008 has yet to be released. His research also reveals another startling fact many North Dakotans already know: of the taxes that most affect people directly—real estate, sales, and income taxes—property taxes account for 47% of the total.

Consider that for a moment: 14.1% of the personal income every North Dakotan earns goes to the government.

That’s a lot.  Of course, some North Dakotans pay more than others given that higher-income citizens pay a higher percentage rate than lower-income citizens, but it’s clear that the state’s government is too great a burden on the state’s citizens.  Especially when compared to previous years as we see in this graphic provided by Vance:

What makes this point particularly poignant is that it’s coming from a Democrat candidate for political office.  Which illustrates, I think, just how completely North Dakota Republicans have abandoned the principles that are supposed to be at the core of their party: Limited government and lower taxes.

Mitch Vance, a Democrat, is talking about the heavy burden North Dakotans pay in taxes.  Meanwhile John Hoeven, the state’s Republican Governor, opposes efforts to lower those taxes and supports efforts to increase taxes.

Of course, if Vance were to be elected State Treasurer there wouldn’t be a lot he could do about spending which is set by the Governor and the Legislature, but it is interesting to see a Democrat getting to the right of state Republicans on spending and tax issues.

Comments

Why is a candidate for a government bureaucracy position weighing in on tax policy which has nothing to do with the functions of the position he is running for?
The North Dakota State Treasurer’s job is to collect taxes in the most efficient and cost effective manner possible; PERIOD!

Kevin on August 12, 2008 at 03:49 pm

This is just more Dem deception.  I’m still waiting for that Clinton “middle class tax cut”.  Dems try to make political hay by criticizing Republican spending, then when they get in, they jack up taxes and spending.


Save America; boycott the MSM.

robert108 on August 12, 2008 at 05:03 pm

You’re right Kevin, but I think I’d rather have someone in favor of returning our money to us than have someone who isn’t.

Right now Vance is making a strong case to support him rather than Kelly Schmidt who as far as I am concerned is a Hoeven sycophant. 

There is no Republican in the race.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on August 12, 2008 at 05:21 pm

When Poolman pulled this stunt before he took off for his new cushy job, my BCBS rates went up at almost three times the rate of inflation; a pox on all their houses!

Kevin on August 12, 2008 at 07:58 pm
Rob
Rob
19145 comments
Send a private message

I’m not even sure the state treasurer should be elected.  It’s a bureaucratic position that should probably be appointed.

That said, at least Vance is talking about lowering taxes and spending which is more than we can say about Republicans.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on August 13, 2008 at 08:20 am

What’s interesting is that Vance is so incredibly cheap. 

The surplus is around a billion dollars.  The population of ND is around 600,000.  That would work out to $1600 a person.

The last budget was 12% of ongoing spending increases and 11% for “one time” projects.  Therefore there is NO reason for the state to increase funding over the current budget. 

That would leave the $1666 per person to be returned to the taxpayers.

Or are the republicans and democrats in the state to greedy to give up money they don’t need?


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on August 13, 2008 at 08:54 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.