North Dakota Democrat Caught Lying To Congress And The IRS

A little over a week ago I posted on news that over a half a million acres of privately-owned land in North Dakota had been handed over to an un-elected, quasi-government board for management thanks to a bill put in the 2009 Omnibus Land Management Act by Senator Byron Dorgan. The owners of the property, who had only been notified that such a move was being considered, were shocked to learn that their land could now be managed by someone else.
Now comes news that one of the primary movers and shakers behind this effort, state Senator Tracy Potter, engaged in some dubious finagling to get this land under his control (he sits at the head of the board which now has management power). Senator Potter told Congress in Washington DC that hearings had been held and there was broad public support for the plan. He was right that meetings had been held, but the public was only on board with a feasibility study. They weren’t necessarily in favor of their land being designated as National Heritage Areas.
Further, Potter’s group appears to have been less than truthful about lobbying efforts for this designation on tax disclosure forms filed with the IRS. The North Dakota Policy Council has the scoop:

Northern Plains Heritage Foundation Director and North Dakota State Senator Tracy Potter organized a lobbying effort to get more than half a million acres of private property designated as the Northern Plains Heritage Area in March (See Figure 1 below), by the US Congress, without disclosing such efforts to the IRS, which is required by law. He also convinced a congressional subcommittee, in 2007, that such a designation had widespread public support, when it did not. …
In 2005, the NPHF Board began as a sub-group of the Fort Abraham Lincoln Foundation, which is also administered by Potter. In 2007, the NPHF received a $62,000 federal grant and split away from the Fort Abraham Lincoln Foundation. In fact, the NPHF filed its own Form 990 – the tax return filed by non-profit organizations – which revealed that a portion of the federal funds ($8,446.22 – Page 2) were used to pay for Potter’s trip to testify at the subcommittee hearing in Washington, D.C. And the Fort Abraham Lincoln Foundation hired lobbyists to urge the passage of the NHA.
The Greystone Group, a Washington, D.C.-based lobbying organization which also does work for a handful of North Dakota colleges, filed a 2007 lobbying report for the work that was done on behalf of the Fort Abraham Lincoln Foundation in support of the NHA designation. However, the Fort Abraham Lincoln Foundation reported on its Form 990 that it did not lobby. Clearly, however, the non-profits were attempting to influence legislation.
According to the Greystone Group’s disclosure reports, both the Fort Abraham Lincoln Foundation and the NPHF lobbied for the Northern Plains National Heritage Area Act, in 2008. And in 2009, the NPHF lobbied for S. 22 – a bill which included the NPHA designation.
In testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on National Parks, Potter also claimed that there was public support for the NHA designation.
“In public hearings before city and county commissions the meaning of such a program has been discussed and the commissions have unanimously provided their encouragement,” Potter testified.
The NPHF met with the commissions and several civic organizations to discuss the idea of a National Heritage Area designation in 2005 and 2006. However, not all five county commissions Potter referred to offered up support for the designation, as letters that appear in the feasibility study and meetings minutes show. (Click HERE and HERE to view the letters.)

In summary, Senator Potter played fast and loose with the truth about public support in North Dakota for this designation while testifying in Washington DC. Potter also apparently tried to conceal lobbying efforts on behalf of the designation by the various groups he heads up (National Plains Heritage Foundation and the Fort Abraham Lincoln Foundation).
One would hope that Senator Potter would be held accountable for these transgressions.
And we should also ask ourselves why the government needs to manage all of these lands. My guess is that Senator Byron Dorgan is probably leading the charge on this in the background, with this designation being a way for him to funnel lots and lots of federal pork back into the state (this designation allows the government to develop the land for tourism and recreation) so that he can be repaid in kind with contributions and political support from the people he funneled the pork to.
It’s basically like a “get Democrats elected” piggy bank being created at the expense of our tax dollars and some land owners’ property rights.
North Dakotans should be very, very alarmed by this.

Tags: , , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array ChuckD

    Jambaliar, Potter lied on federal tax forms, so now he’s qualified for a cabinet position.

    Whistler, this is the kind of crap you get from all politicians. Let’s not forget Republicans’ shameful percentage of pork requests in all budgets. Politicians are all a bunch of sub-human bums.

  • conundrum

    Intriguing and alarming if due diligence and oversight are put into place by the local governments. I traced back to Farm Bureau sight (again hypocrisy raising its head) A landowner worrying about gov’t involvement where it wasn’t wanted but in the heading it shows a lady filling up with e85) http://www.ndfb.org/policy/default.asp?ID=466. Good link.
    If Mr. Potter didn’t go about this in an appropriate manner it is probably lawsuit time. It sounds as if he didn’t get permission from local land owners first. The NPS sight is pretty specific that local approval had to play a major part. If your local gov’t have succumbed to the fed $ carrot then it is time to vote some local commissioners out if you are a land owner in this area and don’t agree.
    My home town went through this when the NPS and some local businessmen decided it would be a money maker for a national park to be established. Land owners in the park, Voyageurs National Park, lost their cabins after twenty years. The NPS stated that snowmobiles wouldn’t be restricted . Eventually they became restricted to certain areas.
    The tourist industry did not flourish as projected. The people have accepted it now but it wasn’t the most popular decision for many freedom loving individuals (think Alaska but further south). It is now what it was back before the NPS, except the camp sites are
    nicer.

  • conundrum

    Intriguing and alarming if due diligence and oversight are put into place by the local governments. I traced back to Farm Bureau sight (again hypocrisy raising its head) A landowner worrying about gov’t involvement where it wasn’t wanted but in the heading it shows a lady filling up with e85)
    If Mr. Potter didn’t go about this in an appropriate manner it is probably lawsuit time. It sounds as if he didn’t get permission from local land owners first. The NPS sight is pretty specific that local approval had to play a major part. If your local gov’t have succumbed to the fed $ carrot then it is time to vote some local commissioners out if you are a land owner in this area and don’t agree.
    My home town went through this when the NPS and some local businessmen decided it would be a money maker for a national park to be established. Land owners in the park, Voyageurs National Park, lost their cabins after twenty years. The NPS stated that snowmobiles wouldn’t be restricted . Eventually they became restricted to certain areas.
    The tourist industry did not flourish as projected. The people have accepted it now but it wasn’t the most popular decision for many freedom loving individuals (think Alaska but further south). It is now what it was back before the NPS, except the camp sites are
    nicer.

  • TomTom

    BFD..Democrats believe the more corrupt..the better to serve america.

  • conundrum

    Being lazy and not wanting to research. What benefit does the state get from this land grab. It sounds like they won’t be developing it, and may lose taxes on it. I guess I don’t see the benefit on why they would do this.

  • conundrum

    It sounds like the bullshit Buffalo Commons proposed a few years ago.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    SO Potter lied on a federal tax document..oooops… looks like he is going to jail!

    Maybe not since all of the moron’s in NOBAMA administration have tax problems.

  • robert108

    That will assure him of a post in the Obama administration, most likely. Probably something in the Treasure Dept.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    If he lied throw his out of office and throw him in jail. Of course it’s ok for Dems to not be truthful.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    This is the kind of dishonest crap we get from Democrats.

  • badlands4

    Dishonest politicians? say it ain’t so!

  • Jambaliar

    SO Potter lied on a federal tax document..oooops… looks like he is going to jail!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Chuck makes a good point. The Hoeven administration is mixed up in this too. Hoeven’s tourism board recommends the people for the boards that are managing these lands.

    But then, Hoeven is just another Democrat too.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I guess I don’t see the benefit on why they would do this.

    It gives Dorgan a big target to pork up with tourism money. Managing this land means lots of room to build visitor centers, bike paths, etc.

    Pork, pork, pork. That’s the benefit. For the politicians, not anyone else.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Here’s another potential problem: The land that just got grabbed is all in coal country.

    How much of a hurt are they going to put on the coal people?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development