Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

New York Times To Hillary: Give Up And Let Us Crown Obama Already

The editorial board at the New York Times is clearly tired of the Democrat primary race and all the in-fighting it is creating.  Clearly, they’re anxious to get back to a “us liberals” vs. “them conservatives” situation.

The Pennsylvania campaign, which produced yet another inconclusive result on Tuesday, was even meaner, more vacuous, more desperate, and more filled with pandering than the mean, vacuous, desperate, pander-filled contests that preceded it.

Voters are getting tired of it; it is demeaning the political process; and it does not work. It is past time for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to acknowledge that the negativity, for which she is mostly responsible, does nothing but harm to her, her opponent, her party and the 2008 election.

I’d tend to disagree that voters are getting tired of the race.  I think the more likely scenario is that liberal newspaper editors are getting worried that this extended primary battle is going to hurt the Democrats in the upcoming election.  But even if it does hurt them, who cares?  An extended primary gives voters a longer than usual amount of time to examine the candidates, and given the sort of soft-light coverage the Democrats usually get from the media the spotlight being on Hillary and Obama longer is particularly useful this time around.

Comments

And the winner in the the Pennsylvania campaign is…
(drumroll please)… John McCain !

Keep up the good work Democrats.

Thank you

Mickey on April 23, 2008 at 09:44 am
Avatar for Hannitized

So much for that big victory for Hillary you were crowing about yesterday.

I guess that makes you wrong again, like you were when you said Obama was too afraid to answer questions, instead of merely wanting to finish his breakfast.

Sorry, I should shut up now, I know nobody wants to hear the truth or realities, only your mischaracterizations of things you/they aren’t willing to consider.

Nevermind.  Carry on.

“What we’re seeing now is that even as President Carter suggests there is a breakthrough, you had some of the same old rhetoric coming out of Hamas representatives with regard to Israel,” Obama said during a stop at a Pittsburgh diner, referencing a statement made Monday by Meshaal that Hamas would not in fact recognize Israel.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/22/obama-carters-hamas-meeting-was-a-bad-idea/

Hannitized on April 23, 2008 at 09:55 am

Hannitized , You should be a spokes person for Obama on a larger venue! Keep it up! There is HOPE for you.

Zsa Zsa on April 23, 2008 at 10:24 am
Avatar for Eneils Bailey

“And the winner in the the Pennsylvania campaign is…
(drumroll please)… John McCain !

Keep up the good work Democrats.

Thank you”

You got that one right, the democraps, they are down to two candidates. One, who is more frivolous, superficial, transparent, and more irrelevant than a turd at a Sunday picnic. That be Osama Obama.

And then, there is HRC, would you call her friend or candidate for President; after the lying, screeching, failures of memory, the inability to keep her fool husband’s pecker in his pants? I don’t want her to command anything if she can’t control anyone with a sexual mentally given to constant sexual squirting.

Eneils Bailey on April 23, 2008 at 10:54 am
Avatar for Robert Hogan

Go, go Operation Chaos.  Or is that KAOS?

Robert Hogan on April 23, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Avatar for deadrody

Let me get this straight.  The Pennsylvania campaign produced an “inconclusive result” and Hillary’s negative campaign did nothing but cause “harm to her”. 

And these words are supposed to describe what happened yesterday when Hillary beat Obama by 10 points (all but a blowout in election terms) when she was once tied with him, or trailed. 

Do they even CARE about the reality of a situation when they describe it, or is complete make believe becoming acceptable ? ?

deadrody on April 23, 2008 at 12:54 pm
Avatar for deadrody

Oh, unless the inconclusive result is because of the idiotic proportional split of the delegates based on the vote percentages.  They stupid Democrats have nobody to blame but themselves for that fiasco.  Really, what dipshit came up with that piece of brilliance ???  I find it hard to believe this kind of campaign fight would be anything but inevitable under that system.

deadrody on April 23, 2008 at 12:58 pm

It’s Operation Chaos.  I got a shirt from Rush’s website.  It is pretty sweet.  The attack plan is working brilliantly and McCain will definitely win in November.



A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

dougee on April 23, 2008 at 02:43 pm

And these words are supposed to describe what happened yesterday when Hillary beat Obama by 10 points (all but a blowout in election terms) when she was once tied with him, or trailed.

Predictions from before the election had her about 5 points ahead.  This clearly is coming in much better than anybody had anticipated, as her sudden jump in fundraising has demonstrated.

Carrick on April 23, 2008 at 02:48 pm

I guess that makes you wrong again, like you were when you said Obama was too afraid to answer questions, instead of merely wanting to finish his breakfast.

Get real.  If the guy had simply wanted to finish his breakfast, he would have had room service. 

Pretty sure he could have afforded it.

So much for that big victory for Hillary you were crowing about yesterday.

Yep, Obama did get his tail thrashed didn’t he?

Carrick on April 23, 2008 at 02:49 pm
Avatar for Gerald

Its amazing that Clinton is claiming momentum ... let’s look at it:
She started with a 20+ lead whish was cut to 9.2 in just 6 weeks
She started the campaign with:
Greater name recogniton
Former Pres Clintion and His entire political machine
More Money
More super -delegates
More endorsements

Today:
The highest negativity rateings
Considered the Least Trustworthy
$10,000,000 in debt
Has only added 7 to 10 new delegates Obama 85+ since Feb
2 MAJOR staff turnovers
NYT looks as if it wants to take back its endorsement
Oh ... she still has Pres Clinton!

OBama
More delegats(that IS how the Dems chose a candidate)
More of the popular vote
Won more states (contest)
Raised more money
Added more super-delagates 85+
Higher Positive ratings
Added more New Dems party
Larger % of Gov, Sen, Congresspersons, Mayors supporting him
Should I continue???

Gerald on April 23, 2008 at 04:38 pm
Avatar for Antonia M

It’s one thing to be ambitious and aggressive. It’s another thing to behave like a spoiled brat shouting “Mine, mine, mine!” A person willing to hold an entire nation back to get what she wants is not a good candidate for president in my opinion. I think the incredibly transparent and underhanded tactics she’s employed out of desperation also make her a dangerous candidate. How she has run her campaign (thanks Gerald for that great summary) is an indicator of how she’d run an administration. So despite all her experience, connections and money, America will be worse of with Hillary in the Oval Office according to her performance.

I was once for Hillary. Then I hoped for the double-header dream ticket. Then I thought, “maybe she can try again next time.” Now? I don’t want to see her anywhere near the oval office ever. You’d have to be a pretty poor ‘commander in chief’ to do a 180 like that in such a relatively short a time. I don’t think American can survive 4 years of Hillary. We need to get of the ditch we’re already in.

Antonia M on May 2, 2008 at 10:19 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.