New York Times Concludes That Wright Won’t Matter For Obama

The Whistler  •  May 6, 2008

How did they reach this conclusion? They interviewed 283 Democrats in coffee houses and gourmet dog biscuit stores.
You know, real “man on the street” type stuff. A good cross-section of Americans.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    The out-of-touch New York Times, with a rapidly declining customer base, interviews Democrats in gourmet dog biscuit stores to see how an elitist candidate would fare in a national election?
    It sounds like an Onion story! Or a bad April Fool’s joke!

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    The out-of-touch New York Times, with a rapidly declining customer base, interviews Democrats in gourmet dog biscuit stores to see how an elitist candidate would fare in a national election? It sounds like an Onion story! Or a bad April Fool’s joke

    That is just like one of these polling operations running a poll sampling 100 dems and 200 republicans and calling it a scienitific poll.

  • FlyOnTheWall

    Proof, they’re not out of touch. NYT says a group of Obama supporters don’t care or agree with what Wright says. Further, it implies the NYT wants everyone else to think they should not care or agree with what Wright says.

    I’d call it news, not very surprising really, but news nonetheless. It’s useful data. What I pull from it is a problem with Obama getting the undecided voters as this blows up. This soft pitch media coverage could cost the democrats the ’08 election.

    (I heard Obama on a radio interview without knowing it was him. Nice speaking voice. Suicidally naive fiscal policies.)

  • Mohair Sam

    It is amazing how the NYT can publish with authority, totally opposite opinions one day to the next

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development