Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Thursday, April 13, 2006

New Orleans - The Next Atlantis?

As if there isn't enough problems with flooding in New Orleans from hurricanes, dikes failing and delta erosion, as pointed out in Are shifts in Earth's crust causing New Orleans to sink? a major deep earth fault under New Orleans may be subsiding causing the area to sink at a faster rate than from all other geological conditions:

New research suggests, however, that at least for nearby Michoud, La., the dominant driver pulling the region under may not be among the usual suspects: oil extraction, pumping groundwater to the surface, or diverting the Mississippi for navigation.

Instead, the King of Slump may be a deep fault that cuts across southeastern Louisiana and under Michoud. During the 1970s, the fault appears to have contributed from 50 to 73 percent of the subsidence in this section of Orleans parish, depending on the time period measured. If sustained over a century, that would equate to as much as a six-foot sea-level rise, independent of any increase tied to global warming.


If this is true, the folly of rebuilding New Orleans on the same site is obvious unless of course it is a city that can float. Otherwise Mayor Naggins chocolate city is destined to become very wet and who likes soggy chocolate?

Read it all.

Comments

Avatar for Robert Perry

It’s worth noting that the newer portions of New Orleans would never have been built without federal aid.  Those are the ones below sea level, largely.  It’s also worth noting that it only exists because the French government was persuaded to set up a capital in a poor location.

In other words, the problem is ....government.

Robert Perry on April 13, 2006 at 12:50 pm
Avatar for The.Whistler

J’aime blaming the Francais?

The.Whistler on April 13, 2006 at 12:53 pm
Avatar for Seth Williams

New Orleans is the next Atlantis? Well, OK...but I get dibs on the first Stargate ride!

Seth Williams on April 13, 2006 at 01:29 pm
Avatar for Robert Perry

Quite right, docdave--now what entity, in your experience, is most likely to ignore the physical repercussions and build/insure/etc.. cities below sea level, in hurricane zones, in earthquake zones, etc..?

That would be, of course, the government, no? 

Robert Perry on April 13, 2006 at 01:48 pm
Avatar for Seth Williams

Robert Perry: the answer to your question as to which entity, in my experience, is most likely to ignore the physical repercussions and build and insure cities below sea level, in hurricane zones, in earthquake zones, or even on volcanoes, can only be "a human being".

If the government fell tonight, tomorrow people still would build in nice homes in known bad places just because it had a killer view. It’s what people do.

Seth Williams on April 13, 2006 at 02:20 pm
Avatar for Epicurus

You can rebuild there as long as you do it in an intelligent way. 

Epicurus on April 13, 2006 at 08:51 pm
Avatar for Epicurus

You can rebuild there as long as you do it in an intelligent way. 

Epicurus on April 13, 2006 at 08:51 pm
Avatar for Epicurus

You can rebuild there as long as you do it in an intelligent way. 

Epicurus on April 13, 2006 at 08:51 pm
Avatar for Bat One

Epicurus,

Doin’ a lot of rebuilding? 

Bat One on April 13, 2006 at 09:02 pm
Avatar for Epicurus

Bat One,

I am currently remodeling a house, so yes. smile

Epicurus on April 13, 2006 at 09:08 pm
Avatar for Robert Perry

Realitybased Bob hits it on the head; don’t you think that people would have rethought their homes on the flood plain if FEMA hadn’t been there to bail them out?

Yes, people can be stupid and lose a house without government interference.  Once, and then their insurance goes up and they think "hey, wait a minute, this is costing me."  The majority of people only repeatedly make stupid decisions when someone else is paying the bill, however.

Robert Perry on April 14, 2006 at 06:20 am
Avatar for Chief RZ

RobertPerry-  That’s the way to do it, let people live with the consequences of their decisions.

rbb-  I looked at your references.  I did not see any or many of those counties designated for FEMA assistance as being in a flood plain.

The Truth:  We have a developer here called "green diamond".   They have been trying to build in and on a flood plain for about five or more years.  Now the City of Columbia is offering to annex the land (for taxes, of course) in --  ‘appears to be’ exchange for building a levy so they might be able to build there.   Not a good idea.  Same story, different location.  New Orleans should not FEMA insure rebuilding in a flood plain.

Chief RZ on April 14, 2006 at 06:42 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.