New Credit Card Laws Will Protect People Who Don’t Pay Their Bills At The Expense Of Those Who Do

Reward the irresponsible while punishing the responsible. It’s the liberal way, apparently.

Credit cards have long been a very good deal for people who pay their bills on time and in full. Even as card companies imposed punitive fees and penalties on those late with their payments, the best customers racked up cash-back rewards, frequent-flier miles and other perks in recent years.
Now Congress is moving to limit the penalties on riskier borrowers, who have become a prime source of billions of dollars in fee revenue for the industry. And to make up for lost income, the card companies are going after those people with sterling credit.
Banks are expected to look at reviving annual fees, curtailing cash-back and other rewards programs and charging interest immediately on a purchase instead of allowing a grace period of weeks, according to bank officials and trade groups.
“It will be a different business,” said Edward L. Yingling, the chief executive of the American Bankers Association, which has been lobbying Congress for more lenient legislation on behalf of the nation’s biggest banks. “Those that manage their credit well will in some degree subsidize those that have credit problems.”

On a related note, the Senate just passed a bill putting the very restrictions mentioned above on credit card companies.
Your ability to get a good deal on credit is about to get diminished, because as the man just said. You’re about to be subsidizing other people’s credit problems.
This is just another way in which government intervention into free markets has negative connotations. Small business owners. Individuals. These people are going to suffer. Their buying power is going to be diminished. All because the politicians feel the need to buy votes with “look at how nice we are” legislation aimed at people who don’t pay their bills.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array bill-tb

    Great title … thinking like a liberal.

    Going to have two effects … lower total goods purchased, and make a nice cash economy which in the end will lower tax receipts.

    It’s a well known fact — You cannot be a liberal and rational at the same time.

  • bill-tb

    The kicker is the interest starts at time of purchase … That’s going to change buying.

  • Brent

    The ones going to get screwed are those that are in between “deadbeats” and those who are really in debt and have no way of getting out except for bankruptcy.

    The ones who are going to get screwed are people like me, who use the cards as a convenient means of payment and collect the rewards as a bonus. I suppose I could use my crummy debit card instead, but it has obnoxiously low daily spending limits, crappier rewards, and lots less flexibility in other ways. Looking forward to Congress once again shitting on me.

  • brain trust

    Wait until these credit card companies start cutting off a lot of these marginal card holders. We will see how much the cardholders complain then.

    Liberals Golden Rule – We must all suffer equally!

  • Buzz

    It is a free market, if the banks can’t make money with credit card loans, they should get out of the business. And if your card company changes its rules to your dislike, just go to another bank. That is what is so great about capitalism.

  • Bat One

    Listening to all the leftist hyperbole one might almost think that having credit cards is some sort of “right” guaranteed by the Constitution. It isn’t.

    This is the same witless liberal mentality that gave us no-fault auto insurance, no-fault divorce, and government-mandated mortgage loans for people who couldn’t qualify under normal underwriting standards… all with disastrous, unintended consequences.

    “No-fault” or socialized anything simply means that those who are responsible and aren’t at fault are forced to pick up the tab for those who are irresponsible.

  • Dino2

    As far as I can tell no one is forcing CC companies to charge annual fees. They WANT to charge them. Government is merely allowing them to do so. Are you against freedom?

    Do you think that getting what is essentially up to a 30 day interest-free loan is your birthright? Good capitalists should believe that the convenience and utility of being able to purchase on June 1st and not pay until July 5th has value. Value that the credit issuer is providing but not being reimbursed for presently.

    Have you all become socialist freeloaders who expect that valuable service for free?

    Welcome to capitalism, my friends!

  • Brent

    At one time, this wouldn’t have passed because the congress critters would get expelled from the state they supposedly represent. Today, people who get screwed from this will just blame the credit card companies and our Three Stooges will be happy to oblige, probably holding hearings on why credit card companies are charging interest right away, etc.

    Bastards.

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    And the bailout supports the stupid while thru robbing the productive …………..

    More of the same……….

  • robert108

    As far as I can tell no one is forcing CC companies to charge annual fees. They WANT to charge them.

    The good ones, don’t, ignorant little dino. You remain fact-free, as usual. In the free enterprise system, we have choices; no one is forcing anyone to use credit cards, and the price of an unsecured loan is reasonable, otherwise no one would buy them. You know nothing about economics.

  • pak

    The ones going to get screwed are those that are in between
    “deadbeats” and those who are really in debt and have no way of
    getting out except for bankruptcy. The deadbeats don’t contribute to the cc coffers except for the fee charged the retailer for providing the service. 1 1/2 to 5% which we the consumers actually pay as it is built in to the retail price. The bankrupt don’t pay at all or at a small % of what they owe.
    CC companies could be blowing smoke/ If they do raise rates it will be in what they charge the retailer.
    I had an experience a few years ago when a cc comp. told me to use their card more or they would shut it down. I torched the card and sent them the ashes, explaining I would keep my cards that do give me a rebate of some sort. This is the competition that the card companies have to participate in. They make thier money off of the retailer fee and the fringe users that are occassionly late etc. I can go back to cash and the cc companies can bite me.

  • robert108

    Because they’re collectivists, lefties always do the same thing. With so-called “health insurance”, those who don’t use it pay for those who do. They hate it when people are free to opt out of their schemes.

  • SigFan

    I only maintain 2 cards, both with high limits and zero balances. I pay my bill every month, on-time. I know how much I have on a card before I ever take it out of my wallet. That way I am sure that barring an emergency I will never spend more than I can afford to pay when the bill comes in. So, what the government is saying with this crap is in order to reward me for my being a responsible user of credit, they will allow the CC companies to penalize me in order to reward the irresponsible? What backward universe did I wake up in?

  • sayanything-2483

    socialist freeloaders
    Dino2 on May 19, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    Finally something accurate.

  • WOOFX

    SigFan you are what the CC banks call a deadbeat.

    I only maintain 2 cards, both with high limits and zero balances. I pay my bill every month, on-time.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development