Networks Will Be Scrambling To Call Race For Obama Before Voting Is Done

I think there ought to be a moratorium on this kind of nonsense.
We know our voting system is imperfect. From fraudulent voter registrations filed by Obama’s former employers at ACORN to defective voting machines, there are always problems on election day. So does it really make sense to exacerbate those problems by putting pressure on local election officials to release count data so that media outlets can “call” the election before the counting is even done? Are we forgetting what happened in the 2000 election?
What’s particularly troubling is how often media types take into count exit polls when “calling” election results in certain areas of the country. Exit polls are wrong. A lot. And they skew heavily toward liberals, who seem to like to talk to exit pollsters a lot more than conservatives do. So why let those rarely-accurate polls influence people who have not yet voted?
I think that it would be a good thing for this country to enact laws to end the election night horse race put on by the media. I mean, I’m sure it’s good for ratings and everything, but voting officials have enough on their hands without having to feed information to the media. And voters don’t need to be discouraged from the polls by talking heads who like to declare winners before all the votes are in.
I think that it should be official policy that election officials not release vote tallies until at least one day after election day. Let’s allow enough time for everyone to vote, and at least a little time for any kinks to be worked out, before we go declaring winners.
That’d be the optimal way of doing things, but it probably makes too much sense.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/some_hints/ AKAJOEL

    As we have all witnessed these last few months,their steadfast and consistent course of action is to get power in any way they can, including lying, cheating and stealing. Their ultimate and most fundamental rule is that the ends justify the means. Any means.

    It’s not just about the redistribution of “our” wealth, it also about the redistribution of power and control.

    Obama learned well form Saul Alinsky who asserted that he was more concerned with the acquisition of power than anything else.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    Food for thought:

    Only two kinds of people can afford the luxury of acting on principle, those with absolute power and those with none and no desire to get any…everyone else who wants to be effective in politics has to learn to be ‘unprincipled’ enough to compromise in order to see their principles succeed.
    (Alinsky 1971: 4)

    The Radical may resort to the sword but when he does he is not filled with hatred against those individuals whom he attacks. He hates these individuals not as persons but as symbols representing ideas or interests which he believes to be inimical to the welfare of the people. (Alinsky 1946: 23)

    “The Radical may resort to the sword..” Really?

    O.K….I’ll play..that’s exactly what my response to them will be.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/some_hints/ AKAJOEL

    A paradox ?—even though most of those voting for Barack Obama do not want to fundamentally transform America… that is what Barack Obamas and the Democrat party intend to [and will] do.

    Then, seemingly to the contrary, I heard Scott Rasmussen on with Bill O’Reilly a few days ago and he said that one of his polls indicated that 46% of those polled “have no problem” with making the U.S. a socialist country. WTF? Who are these bewildered morons? Hazardous waste from Gov mint schools and Bill Ayers’-Rahid Khlaidi type marxists re-education camps [euphemistically referred to as universities]?

  • golfmann

    I thought laws WERE passed about exit polling results before the polls closed.

  • RebTex

    New Hampshire has already called the earliest vote for obama.

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    Oh My Gosh! It took the Obamas soooooooo long to vote! AND when they finally emerged from behind the voting machines, it looked to me like they were doing a little campaigning in the voting area! Shaking hands and talking to people. Plus they took their children. I wonder how many times the Obamas voted? Creepy! This is absolutely The Most corrupt election I have yet to witness! Really pathetic.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/some_hints/ AKAJOEL

    Alaskan Independence Party…..sounds like they have it right!
    Is it a bad idea to move to Alaska in the middle of winter?
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

  • ashley

    Oh My Gosh! It took the Obamas soooooooo long to vote!

    He didn’t have his advisors there to help him decide what to do…lol… hope this isn’t an indicator on his decision making process if he gets to the White House!!!!! Ahhh… I can’t even stand watching him!!!!

  • RebTex

    Here’s an aside that, if it weren’t so important would bring a chuckle…..
    In ’04, I got to choose between John F. Kerry or George W. Bush.
    Guess what was hidden on the Texas ballot….
    You guessed it! Hussein
    THe full legal names of the candidates weren’t on the ballots.

  • shanah

    New Hampshire has already called the earliest vote for obama

    I thought it said “a tiny town” in New Hampshire called it Obama.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/some_hints/ AKAJOEL

    ****Keep this in mind*******

    The Marxists Dems and their MSM counterparts, want total control of what you see, hear, think, and do.

    They will stop at nothing. NOW, they are aiming at your 401k retirement plan and they are going for the kill.

    Yep that’s right, Liberals in government want to seize these assets for their own. Just look at what James Pethokoukis, the money and politics blogger for U.S. News & World Report has said,

    In place of 401(k) plans, she would have workers transfer their dough into government-created “guaranteed retirement accounts” for every worker.

    The government would deposit $600 (inflation indexed) every year into the GRAs. Each worker would also have to save 5 percent of pay into the accounts, to which the government would pay a measly 3 percent return.

    Rep. Jim McDermott, a Democrat from Washington and chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee’s Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support, said that since “the savings rate isn’t going up for the investment of $80 billion [in 401(k) tax breaks], we have to start to think about whether or not we want to continue to invest that $80 billion for a policy that’s not generating what we now say it should.”

    Straight from the jackasses mouth, the Democratic plan is to SIEZE your 401k and take $80 billion that is currently the property of American citizens.

    Effectively, this plan will end all of the incentives that the majority of Americans not only enjoy but rely on. I am sure you or someone you know takes advantage of their employer matching their 401k contribution.

    Under the iron fist of the Democratic empire your employer would no longer receive a tax benefit for matching your contribution, so they won’t do it. And you will lose half of your retirement contributions. And don’t forget, that you will lose your tax breaks from the 401k plan also, so you’d be paying the government to let you retire.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development