Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, April 11, 2008

Nature Is Not Bountiful

A smack down of high-profile greenie Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in the form of a letter to the New York Times, by prolific letter-to-the-editor author and economist Don Boudreaux:

Robert Kennedy, Jr., might be correct that electricity is best provided in Chile by means other than hydroelectric dams (Letters, April 8). His presumption, however, about the source of prosperity casts doubt on the quality of his argument.

Mr. Kennedy opposes dams because he wants to protect “nature’s bounty.” But nature is not bountiful. If it were, human history would be one of prosperity and long, healthy lives rather than one of oppressive poverty and short, miserable lives.  Nature is miserly.  The bounty that Mr. Kennedy presumes comes from nature is, in fact, the relatively recent product of human creativity and industry unleashed by free markets - and now threatened by the mindless worship of nature.

Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux

I’m reminded of this quote from the Robert A. Heinlein character Lazarus Long (from the novel Time Enough for Love:

There are hidden contradictions in the minds of people who “love Nature” while deploring the “artificialities” with which “Man has spoiled Nature.” The obvious contradiction lies in their choice of words, which imply that Man and his artifacts are not part of “Nature"-but beavers and their dams are.  But the contradictions go deeper than this prima-facie absurdity.  In declaring his love for a beaver dam (erected by beavers for beavers’ purposes) and hatred of dams erected by men (for the purposes of men) the “Naturist” reveals his hatred for his own race-i.e., his own self hatred.

In the case of “Naturists” such self-hatred is understandable; they are such a sorry lot.  But hatred is too strong an emotion to feel toward them; pity and contempt are the most at any rate.

I think there certainly is an element of self-loathing which exists in the environmentalist movement - certainly you can’t say that the very air we exhale is a pollutant without hating yourself at least a little bit - but mostly I think environmentalists are just after power, and the fool’s crusade to “save the environment” is just the excuse they need to gain it.

Comments

I always get my Heinlein lore mixed up...I thought Lazarus Long was the main character from “Stranger in a Strange Land”.

Well whatever; He and Boudreaux were both correct.

I used to admire some old school conservationist because they dealt with their current enviornment in a way in which to enrich it.

Kennedy (and most environmentalist) does just the opposite.


“To love is not to stare steadfast at one another...it is to look forward, in the same direction.”
Saint-Exupéry

laydownSally on April 11, 2008 at 09:24 pm
Avatar for youfuckingmoron

yeah, the tree-huggers have finally sold out, right?  they want to drive the lexus for a while, put on the big boy pants?

youfuckingmoron on April 11, 2008 at 09:28 pm

Too many believe man can control/affect nature or the planet. 

Idiots…

atease


atease

atease on April 11, 2008 at 09:32 pm

Absolutely right. Guilt and self loathing are the root of environazi stupidity. And the illustrate the point succinctly suckpuppet toddles in and spews more stupidity.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on April 12, 2008 at 08:21 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.