Nancy Pelosi Is Selling Snake Oil On Health Care Costs

John Fund reports in the Wall Street Journal:

Blue Dogs who are dragged into Speaker Pelosi’s office should be aware of just how she is selling the health care bill. Yesterday, she told supporters it represented “real change,” because it meant “a cap on your [health care] costs, but no cap on your benefit.”

Essentially, what Pelosi is saying is that the Democrat plan for health care can provide you with an unlimited amount of health care “benefit” on a finite budget that’s actually represents less spending then we’re doing on health care now.
Anyone who has ever planned a wedding reception knows differently. Think of it this way: Private health care is a cash bar. Government health care is an open bar. We all know that less booze gets consumed at a cash bar than an open bar, and thus open bars are very, very expensive. But what Pelosi is suggesting is that we can have our health care be an open bar, where people can get all they want and have someone else pay for it, and simultaneously have it cost less overall than a cash bar where people have to pay for what they get.
This is simply not true. Pelosi is either lying in favor of her plan for health care or she’s economically illiterate.
The truth is, if the Democrats actually intend private health care to cost less than private health care, it can’t be an open bar. It’ll be more like the sort of bar where you can drink all you want and you don’t have to pay the bartender, but the bartender gets to pick what you drink. And you have to wait 20 minutes for each drink.
And it costs you $1,000 to get into the reception.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    This is simply not true. Pelosi is either lying in favor of her plan for health care or she’s economically illiterate.

    Yep she is a moron.

  • reaganite

    Once again, health care reform has nothing to do with health care and everything to do with power and control over the population.

  • http://www.webwallpapers.net/ Wallpapers

    They might be trying to compensate the companies with something other then money. (maybe they are paying in fish)

  • Neiman

    If Democrat lips are moving, 100% of the time they are lying. They have no familiarity with or any love for the truth, it is only raw power that interests them.

  • dawneyr

    Good post, Rob.

  • sayanything-2819

    She is a snake.

  • LoadTheMule

    Jvette, why would you insult snakes that way?

  • robert108

    Calling a scheme that costs over a trillion dollars in additional spending “revenue neutral” is a mega-lie.

  • sayanything-2819

    LOL, I make no apologies to snakes. Don’t like ‘em, don’t trust ‘em and will do what I can to remove ‘em.

    Remember Zell Miller’s snake story? I love that tale. I wish someone would do to Pelosi, figuratively of course, what Zell did to that snake.

  • brain trust

    It is sad that there are so many weak minded people out there that believe what Obama, Reid, Pelosi, Dodd, Rangel, Frank, Schumer, Conrad, Dorgan and Pomeroy say. Voting should be limited to those who can at least answer simple constitution and civics questions.

  • Hannitized

    Voting should be limited to those who can at least answer simple constitution and civics questions.

    Which proves you don’t believe in American democracy at all.

  • Flickertail

    Hann, if you didn’t know, the US isn’t a democracy. It is a representive republic. Sorry just a little civics lesson.

  • Flickertail

    If we were a true democracy, Gore would have been President, South Dakota would not have abortion, Illegal imagrants would not get health care in California. A true democracy goes by the votes of the people. We are absolutly not a democacy when a few decide for the many.

  • sayanything-2819

    Which proves you don’t believe in American democracy at all.

    Apparently neither did the Founding Fathers as they believed that voting should be limited to certain people as well. Women, blacks and those who didn’t own property were prohibited from voting.

  • Hannitized

    Which, in turn, indicate their wisdom in allowing us to change our laws and Constitution after the fact.

    So according to Rob Port, our founding fathers left it open for us to change the constitution to prevent morons from owning machine guns.

    So if that is true, then they wouldn’t be upset to learn that we have done so.

    Thanks!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Thank a god our Constitution is a living breathing document, huh!

  • Hannitized

    Hann, if you didn’t know, the US isn’t a democracy. It is a representive republic. Sorry just a little civics lesson. R180

    If we were a true democracy, Gore would have been President, South Dakota would not have abortion, Illegal imagrants would not get health care in California. A true democracy goes by the votes of the people. We are absolutly not a democacy when a few decide for the many.

    Ummmm…….I said “American” democracy. I didn’t say “true” democracy and I didn’t say we weren’t a Democratic Republic.

    You need to work on your civic lessons R180.

  • Flickertail

    Well I’m not R180 but a democracy is a democracy, we are a republic. If you don’t agree sorry you are saying the few represent the many, which isn’t a democracy, all should have a say on every bill, lets put the healthcare bill to a popular vote, otherwise we are not a democracy.

  • robert108

    Well I’m not R180…

    I’m not either; that was my quote, attributed to someone else.
    But really, it’s a fundamental truth about our country, and anyone who doesn’t know that fact is sorely lacking as an American.

  • Flickertail

    And plus you said we didn’t believe in democracy, but how could we when the US isn’t based on it?

  • docdave

    Democracy or republic, the current democratic control espouses neither. Totalitarianism is more like their game.

  • robert108

    Democracy or republic, the current democratic control espouses neither. Totalitarianism is more like their game.

    Absolutely! They are trying as hard as they can to institute one-Party rule in this country, along with a centrally-planned economy.

  • robert108

    Women, blacks and those who didn’t own property were prohibited from voting.

    Wrong on the last one! The provision for voting only for landowners didn’t make the final cut, and was never in the Constitution. It was originally suggested by those who thought only those who “had skin in the game” should be able to levy taxes. Again, it’s not in the Constitution, so you lied.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Well then I’m sure you were just as flustered when the gop was attempting to create a permanent gop majority, right?

  • docdave

    Well then I’m sure you were just as flustered when the gop was attempting to create a permanent gop majority, right?

    Wrong, and you know it but that doesn’t stop you from trying to make a false equivalent, which is your game.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Apparently neither did the Founding Fathers as they believed that voting should be limited to certain people as well. Women, blacks and those who didn’t own property were prohibited from voting.

    Which, in turn, indicate their wisdom in allowing us to change our laws and Constitution after the fact.

    Our founding fathers weren’t perfect, but the system of government they left behind is about as perfect as any government has ever been.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development