Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, June 16, 2006


Murtha: We Should Change Directions In Iraq Like Clinton Did In Somalia

Apparently Rep. John Murtha doesn't think we should learn from our mistakes. Here's what he had to say about the House resolution on Iraq on CNN's Situation Room (video at the link):

MURTHA: The thing that disturbed me and worries me about this whole thing is we can't get them to change direction. And I said over and over in debate, if you listen to any of it, in Beirut President Reagan changed direction, in Somalia President Clinton changed direction, and yet here, with the troops out there every day, suffering from these explosive devices, and being looked at as occupiers — 80 percent of the people want us out of there — and yet they continue to say, "We're fighting this thing." We're not fighting this. The troops are fighting this thing. That's who's doing the fighting.


That's right. President Clinton changed direction in Somalia And what happened then? Our retreat from Somalia convinced Osama bin Laden that America was a "paper tiger."

From an interview done with bin Laden in 1998:

Describe the situation when your men took down the American forces in Somalia.

After our victory in Afghanistan and the defeat of the oppressors who had killed millions of Muslims, the legend about the invincibility of the superpowers vanished. Our boys no longer viewed America as a superpower. So, when they left Afghanistan, they went to Somalia and prepared themselves carefully for a long war. They had thought that the Americans were like the Russians, so they trained and prepared. They were stunned when they discovered how low was the morale of the American soldier. America had entered with 30,000 soldiers in addition to thousands of soldiers from different countries in the world. ... As I said, our boys were shocked by the low morale of the American soldier and they realized that the American soldier was just a paper tiger. He was unable to endure the strikes that were dealt to his army, so he fled, and America had to stop all its bragging and all that noise it was making in the press after the Gulf War in which it destroyed the infrastructure and the milk and dairy industry that was vital for the infants and the children and the civilians and blew up dams which were necessary for the crops people grew to feed their families. Proud of this destruction, America assumed the titles of world leader and master of the new world order. After a few blows, it forgot all about those titles and rushed out of Somalia in shame and disgrace, dragging the bodies of its soldiers. America stopped calling itself world leader and master of the new world order, and its politicians realized that those titles were too big for them and that they were unworthy of them. I was in Sudan when this happened. I was very happy to learn of that great defeat that America suffered, so was every Muslim. ...


Clinton was wrong to pull our troops from Somalia, and Murtha is wrong about pulling our troops from Iraq. When we engage an enemy militarily it is in our national interest to obtain decisive victory. Anything short of that leaves us looking weak in the eyes of our enemies and invites more attacks.

Stephen Spruiell adds:

The comparison was especially ill-timed, given that Islamic extremists are in the process of taking over the country and some are warning that it could become a new safe haven for al Qaeda.


Of course, this probably wouldn't be happening had Clinton finished the job back in the 1990's. And it won't happen in Iraq as long as we finish the job there.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Avatar for robert108

The unfortunate thing about Somalia is that we sent our soldiers there on a humanitarian mission, not a military one.  In that context, Clinton acted appropriately, but the overall mistake he made was to send in the military and not be prepared for a fight to victory.  I’m no Clinton apologist, but the mission, as originally planned, was a bad one.  Based on that, everything that followed was wrong.

robert108 on June 16, 2006 at 09:21 pm
Avatar for Bat One

If I recall correctly, the mission to Somalia was more than just “humanitarian” in nature.

It is also true that our troops there requested reinforcements, heavier armor and weapons, and more helicopters… all of which were denied them.  Clinton, whose wife is probably a more competent commander than he is, sent too few ill-equipped men on a faulty, ill-advised, poorly planned mission.  Then when things went bad, he hung them out to dry.

Almost sounds like Jimmy Carter’s botched Iranian rescue mission, doesn’t it?

Whatever is it about Democrats that they are so grotesquely incompetent at national defense and military matters?

Bat One on June 16, 2006 at 09:31 pm
Avatar for robert108

Answer:  They loathe the military.
The precise mission was to oversee the distribution of aid in Somalia.  Clinton didn’t realize that would put our troops in direct opposition to the warlords, who regarded foreign aid as theirs to take and distribute.  In other words, they were sent in to do something that would get them into combat, without the requisite logistical support.  It was extreme stupidity on Clinton’s part, and our servicemen paid for it.

robert108 on June 16, 2006 at 09:48 pm
Avatar for Gene Redlin

Murtha because of his Iconic military history carries weight others don’t.  That makes him doubly dangerous. 

HE is one reason we can’t let the Dems win in NOV.

Did you like Blackhawk Down?  Multiply that with the horrid retreat from Vietnam and extrapolate it times 150,000 military men and women and you have what the Democrat Liberals want for this country.  Some believe they are doing right.  But they would turn their back on the military and let everyone fend for themselves just to secure power for the left.  It would be a disaster.

This is an evil that must not happen.

I don’t know if I ever mentioned it before.  I don’t like Mr. Murtha much.  He was given much honor and is now abusing it.

Gene Redlin on June 17, 2006 at 05:17 am
Avatar for Proofreader emeritus

“The precise mission was to oversee the distribution of aid in Somalia. Clinton didn’t realize that would put our troops in direct opposition to the warlords”

Robert: The troops sent over to aid in the distribution of food were sent by Bush 41. After Clinton became President, he changed the mission to one of nation building. At that point, ill conceived policy and inadequate logistical support (against the advise of his military commanders in the field)caused the Somalian debacle that occurred.

And, according to Osama bin Laden, encouraged him to escalate attacks against the “paper tiger” US that would cut and run after suffering a few casualties.

Proofreader emeritus on June 17, 2006 at 07:19 am
Avatar for Bat One

Gene,

That Murtha is held to be an “Iconic military” figure by the left, along with Kerry, is what’s so scary.  Kerry’s military fanatsy world is rather well known at this point.

Murtha trumpets his “37 year military career” but all but about 6 years of that was actually spent in the inactive reserves.  And his strategic judgment, as detailed here, is of a level of incompetence that would qualify him as Minister of Defense for the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.

What is truly fightening is the notion that so many people actually regard these two idiots as military experts, and would willingly follow their advice and their lead.

And you are certainly right about electing Democrats.  Truman managed not to win in Korea, Kennedy lost at the Bay of Pigs.  LBJ had Vietnam, while Carter not only screwed up the Iranian crisis, but tried to give away our nation’s strategic military advantage to the Soviet Union.  Clinton, of course, listened to Murtha, thus ineptly messing up in both Somalia and the Balkans… never mind what was not done about Islamist terrorism or his policy of “benign neglect” toward the UYS military over his 8 year presidency.

Indeed, Democrats are about as inept and lethargic about national security and military affairs as they are enthusiastic about taxing everything that moves.

Bat One on June 17, 2006 at 07:46 am
Avatar for Proofreader emeritus

BAt One: Nice reference to Grand Fenwick! The main difference there is that the Duchy actually won their war! But, since it was their intention to lose, the incompetancy analogy is apt!

Proofreader emeritus on June 17, 2006 at 08:41 am
Avatar for Bat One

Proof Prof,

Merci!

Bat One on June 17, 2006 at 09:21 am
Avatar for Anonomisly

There’s definatly a parallel between Clinton’s Somalia and Dubai Bush’s Iraq:

We went into both for a novel cause but our troops were sent indadequatly prepared and with an iffy plan

We went to both as humaneterian and liberators with the porpose of freeing the populace in both countries from their brutal oppresors.

Our leader tried to justify their proven incompetance and while doing so convinced me that they take us for fools: (10-30-30, greeted as liberators and than we’re out, we go to war with the army we have There’s definatly a parallel between Clinton’s Somalia and Dubai Bush’s Iraq:

We went into both for a novel cause but our troops were sent indadequatly prepared and with an iffy plan

We went to both as humaneterian and liberators with the porpose of freeing the populace in both countries from their brutal oppresors.

Our leader tried to justify their proven incompetance and while doing so convinced me that they take us for fools: (10-30-30, greeted as liberators and than we’re out, we go to war with the army we have <—Donald Rumsfeld trying to justify not equiping our brave soldier like they deserved to be equipped)

We got bogged down in both. Because of the gross mismanagement of both administration of their respective conflict.

Thing didn’t go as rosy as both administration led us to believe.

Many of the people we set out to liberate and bring freedom to are joining our opponents, actually FIGHTING us and/or tacitly supporting of our adversery by believing that its OK to kill our brave soldiers.

Final note,

What is currently happeniing in Somalia is yet another testament that while this administrations has made unacceptable mistakes in the way it has handled, grossly mismanaged, Iraq ..decinding to cut and run now is a bad option. Cutting and running would be an awful choise, irrigardless of the fact THE MISSION SHOULD HAVE HAD BEEN COMPLETED A LONG TIME AGO.

Anonomisly on June 17, 2006 at 02:12 pm
Avatar for aNONOMISLY

...our mission IN IRAQ should have had been completed a long time ago

aNONOMISLY on June 17, 2006 at 02:15 pm
Avatar for b

The Iraq war has clarified the current world situation and debunked decades of pro-UN, pro-Communist, pro-socialist Europe, anti-Semitic, anti-American propaganda promoted by global elites.

The geniuses who think they could have done more faster in Iraq aren’t paying attention.

If it fails and Iraq can’t stand, we will finally be able to drill for oil in America and the American people will finally read beyond the MSM and “experts” to discover the history of their nation, the world, reality.

-

“No one wants American troops to keep dying in Iraq and Afghanistan. I know, because I’m one of those troops and I would prefer not to die here. On the other hand, and this is what you won’t hear from most mainstream media, if I do die over here, I’ll do so with few regrets. I wouldn’t be dying for a lie, as so many minstrels of misery and mischief keep spouting.

Americans are dying in Iraq so Americans don’t have to die at home, or so that they can die of self-inflicted things like lung cancer and heart attacks instead of having a building blow up and crush them while they are inside it. Don’t kid yourself that things are otherwise. Keeping the fight in the enemy’s home court is exactly the right thing to do.” - ”>http://willtoexist.com/?p=331

-
‘‘Jefferson’s war against the Barbary pirates was taken up after more than one million Europeans had been made slaves by Muslim traders. John Adams was opposed to the war, by the way, saying prophetically that if we fought these militant Muslims we’d be fighting them forever. ‘’
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MGIyZjU5NWI0MTJlNDQyMjUxZmRkMDkxODEyMTEyODk

For a few hundred years - from the shores of Tripoli onward - mainly Judeo-Christian businessmen with guns have inherited, built upon, lived by, kept and passed down the traditions and values and riches other brave men and women passed on to them.

Thank you.

b on June 18, 2006 at 02:08 pm
Avatar for diane

mainly Judeo-Christian businessmen with guns have inherited

Judaism and Christianity are not one and the same, nor are they conjoined twins.  Jews do not acknowledge or accept Jesus Christ.  They reject him and worse.

Why people like you keep lumping them together has only to do with the fact that you are trying to pull the wool over the eyes of those of us who know the difference.

Judaism is unconditionally and diametrically and vehemently anti- Jesus Christ as who he said he was and what Christians believe.

Try again.

As for Muslims, they believe Jesus Christ was a great prophet and show him immense respect. 

Jews do just the opposite.

If this is not true, please explain why I am wrong with proof.

diane on June 18, 2006 at 02:15 pm
Avatar for robert108

Pe: I stand corrected.

Anon: “Because of the gross mismanagement of both administration of their respective conflict.”

Not according to your boy Zarqawi.  The recently discovered documents reveal our plan is working quite well.  You need an update, boy.

robert108 on June 18, 2006 at 02:18 pm
Avatar for robert108

Another leftie meme bites the dust.

robert108 on June 18, 2006 at 02:18 pm
Avatar for TwoHotel9

Murtha sees this as his leg-up to a run at the White House. My God, how delusional can a politician be?

TwoHotel9 on June 18, 2006 at 02:19 pm
Avatar for Gene Redlin

2h9
WOW, do you really think so.  I know he wants to be speaker.  But White House.

WOW.

I never thought that.

THX

Gene Redlin on June 18, 2006 at 07:02 pm
Avatar for TwoHotel9

He is nearing the age at which he will have to make that last choice. This is his last chance.

TwoHotel9 on June 19, 2006 at 03:56 am
Avatar for Proofreader emeritus

Speaking of chances of that happening, snowball and hell come to mind!

Proofreader emeritus on June 19, 2006 at 07:42 am
Avatar for TwoHotel9

I am not saying he has a chance, even of gaining the nomination. Only that this is his last chance to try.

TwoHotel9 on June 19, 2006 at 05:42 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.