Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Moslem Manchurian Candidates

I assume that everybody reading this post knows about the Manchurian Candidate syndrome which causes one to assume an unexpected personality change and role based on some previous subliminal persuasion. In previous posts and comments, I have stated that most if not all Moslems are capable of assuming a 'manchurian candidate' terrorist personality because of their Islamic relilgion and the persuasive power of the Islamic Imams. In recent news, there is a story of how a presumably mild mannered young man unexpectantly went on a 'terrorist' rage to kill/wound fellow workers and try to commit arson to his work place.

Police Try to Determine Gunman's Motive:

Police on Monday were interviewing relatives of an employee at a Safeway Inc. warehouse to try to determine why he opened fire on co-workers and police before he was shot and killed

Police Chief Gerry Whitman said investigators had talked with some members of Ford's family but had not been able to determine a motive.


Doing the usual multi-culture spin trying to avoid being labeled Islamophobic I presume, the authorities are too quick to belittle the fact that Michael Ford, the killer, was a Moslem.

He declined to comment on a television report that Ford, a Muslim, had been teased about his religion at work, saying he had not known Ford's religion


This is the only reference I was able to find concerning Ford as a 'black muslim'.

Little Green Footballs had posted this additional family comment which probably came from a television interview:

His sister said when he came to visit them Sunday morning, he looked scared and nervous but she didn’t know why. She told reporters that his last words to her were, “Allah will decide. I love you.”


Here you have a 22 year old Moslem man with no criminal record who gets along with everyone but who unexpectedly goes 'postal' and the only anomoly is his Islamic religion which the police are not concerned about.

“We don’t have a strong motive yet, and I don’t know if we’ll know that,” Denver Police Chief Gerry Whitman said Monday. Whitman said Ford’s religious affiliation wasn’t a concern in the investigation
.

Which probably means that the law enforcement people will not investigate the mosque Ford attended or the imam who preached at the mosque. Was Ford a Moslem Manchurian Candidate? Right now one cannot say for sure but what other motive did he have?

Comments

Avatar for diane

I wonder how many nutcases in prison are Muslims and how many are ‘christians’.  I’m betting proportionately more would call themselves ‘christian’, and the percentage would be higher, not in numbers, but in percentage of per religion.  (Not counting Blacks who convert to Islam in prison).

Such prejudice, constantly.

Crusades.  Must have had some psychiatric syndrome because of their faux christianity to do such slaughtering.

Any religion that is twisted is dangerous, and there’s plenty of people these days twisting Christianity into a ‘war religion’...a ‘war president’, war, war, war.  How sick.

diane on June 27, 2006 at 01:28 pm
Avatar for diane

And then there’s Judaism:

Updated: 5:09 p.m. ET June 27, 2006
GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip - Israeli planes attacked a bridge in northern Gaza late Tuesday, Israel Radio reported, and Israeli tanks were said to be on the move, possibly signaling the start of a military operation.

It’s ALWAYS the Arabs’ fault, this is a ‘response’ to Palestinians kidnapping a soldier, but why did they kidnap the soldier, why were they tunneling, why, why, why?

Around and around.

Muslims are some of the most peaceable and kind people I’ve ever met in my life.  And some ‘christians’ some of the meanest and nastiest.  One Muslim I heard once said, “christians (little ‘c’wink are as mean as he**.

After hearing some here and their hatred of Muslims, I’d have to agree as long as we keep it little ‘c’.  The real deal isn’t that way at all.

Hitler claimed Christianity.

diane on June 27, 2006 at 01:31 pm
Avatar for likwidshoe

Muslims are some of the most peaceable and kind people I’ve ever met in my life.

Meanwhile, Islam has bloody borders all over the world and Muslims are in Africa enslaving or massacring everybody who isn’t Arab and Muslim.

But they’re “peaceful”, huh?

Yeah right.

Why do you feel the need to mention Christianity every time Islam is brought up?

likwidshoe on June 27, 2006 at 02:45 pm
Avatar for likwidshoe

lik, now you know why I’d like to delete meaningless misdirection hijacking comments on my posts.

Well...with diane you can be assured that whenever Islam is mentioned, Christianity will be mentioned right after in short order. It is like she is afraid to address Islam’s many problems.

likwidshoe on June 27, 2006 at 03:00 pm
Avatar for robert108

Hitler was a pagan.  He made pro-Christian statements to solidify his power with a Lutheran and Catholic population.  Christians don’t practice genocide against Jews.  Muslims do.

robert108 on June 27, 2006 at 03:13 pm
Avatar for Zsa Zsa

Peaceable and kind? Sure they are. Especially the AlQaeda muslims! I love how nice they are to behead and torture our reporter’s and soldiers. They are so peaceful when they riot over a cartoon. They are so peaceful when they hijack our planes and crash them into buildings too. Uh huh, sure they are...I think it is so nice and kind of them to strap bombs on themselves and kill and destroy property!

Zsa Zsa on June 27, 2006 at 03:51 pm
Avatar for diane

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13580436/

Israeli infantry troops cheer before moving into the southern part of the Gaza Strip on Wednesday. Israel launched the first major ground offensive against Gaza since Israel pulled out settlers and troops from the impoverished coastal strip of land last year, ending a 38-year occupation.

(Just waiting for a chance to go back???)

The Israeli strikes came amid intensive diplomatic efforts in the Arab world and by the United Nations.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice urged Israel to “give diplomacy a chance.”

Obviously, the Israelis reject diplomacy and even urging by ‘our own’ Condi.

This is what Palestinians have faced for half a century.  Is it any wonder they are so frustrated?  And then some would like to call them the aggressors, always making the powerful Israelis underwritten by U.S. mega$$ the ‘victims’.

diane on June 28, 2006 at 12:24 am
Avatar for diane

By the way, don’t miss the photo.  The cheering IDF’ers looking like frat boys after an all-night party...gleeful.

diane on June 28, 2006 at 12:26 am
Avatar for Veritas

Diane,

you say the troops “cheer” like they should be hanging their heads and shuffling their feet, lest they show any human reaction you would consider adversive to the poor innocent terrorists who dug a tunnel, snuck up on Israeli troops on their own land, and proceeded to murder said soldiers and kidnap one of them. I mean, how dare the zionist bastards be EXICITED at the prospect of rescuing their kidnapped comrade! The outrage!

And if that weren’t bad enough, you quote the fact that they are moving into the Gaza strip 38 years after pulling out, in an attempt to set up your “just waiting for a chance to go back??” comment. 

Riiighhht. I mean, the fact that the Israeli PM gave Hamas the chance to return the kidnapped soldier complete with a warning of what would happen if they didn’t (something i’m sure you, being the unbiased observer of this situation you are, actidentally left out....right?) had NOTHING to do with their crossing the border.

Nah, it had to be because they are bloodthirsty zionists intent on murder and pillaging. Because that is what you, in your unbiased observation of the facts in this case has come to believe. Who cares that Hamas could have prevented this whole situation had they simply chosen not to perpetrate a cowardly, unprovoked attack on Israeli troops simply guarding their side of the border, that is unimportant!

I told you in another thread (which you conveniently seemed to have missed) that this is your big chance to prove all of us who accuse you of being a lowlife anti-semite to prove your credibility. All you had to do was speak out against this act of terrorism, without reservation. It was that simple.

But what did you do? You childishly insert ignorant assumptions into a story in order to bolster your “point” that Israel deserved this attack.

Still no admission that Hamas is in the wrong here. Amazing.

BTW, I liked the fact that you were so desperate to make your point that you turned to a spokeswoman for the administration you HATE as evidence against your hated Zionists.

Because we all know that going out of your way to misrepresent even this obvious terrorist act as just another zionist plot against poor wittle Hamas is the action of a truely unbiased observer.

Right?

V

P.S. When Palestine is completely wiped off the map, and you are weeping on your knees, cursing at the evil Joooos for what they’ve done, just remember, you only have one group to blame:

HAMAS

Veritas on June 28, 2006 at 01:40 am
Avatar for Veritas

Id be gleeful too if I found out I get to go find the savages that committed an unprovoked terrorist attack on my fellow soldiers.

Absofuckinglutely.

Veritas on June 28, 2006 at 01:44 am

I certainly hope the Israelis kick the Philistines asses all over the map.

Ken McCracken on June 28, 2006 at 02:11 am
Avatar for diane

Exclude away, docdave.  Can’t take the heat, as Robert always says.

Your first post is just way too long to waste time on Veritas, but I did read this one:

Id be gleeful too if I found out I get to go find the savages that committed an unprovoked terrorist attack on my fellow soldiers.

Absofuckinglutely.

Veritas on June 28, 2006 at 4:44 AM

But the Palestinians should take the killing of their children and the dozing of their homes and the slaughter of their families by Israelis silently and respectfully?

diane on June 28, 2006 at 06:35 pm

If they don’t want their children to suffer, they shouldn’t engage in terrorism.

But they are a backwards and barbaric people, so what do you expect.

Ken McCracken on June 28, 2006 at 06:39 pm
Avatar for Veritas

"Your first post is just way too long to waste time on Veritas”

Coward.

don’t worry, diane. Just keep telling your friends at Hamas to kill more jews. That way, there won’t be a Palestine in about 2 or 3 weeks.

V

Veritas on June 28, 2006 at 09:35 pm
Avatar for Veritas

"But the Palestinians should take the killing of their children and the dozing of their homes and the slaughter of their families by Israelis silently and respectfully?” - diane

But, I thought war was evil and wrong, no matter what? What happened to that, diane? Does this kind of cowardly murderous behavior suddenly become palatible because it is being perpetrated by those you agree with?

How utterly pathetic. Next time, try not to shrill too much. You partisan hack side is showing.

V

Veritas on June 28, 2006 at 09:38 pm
Avatar for diane

Hey V..your logic is about as illogical as likwidshoe’s.  Get it together, man.

Khen, you’re not worth the effort but oh well, I’m in a good and relaxed state of mind tonight and can bear with a little ignorance.

But they are a backwards and barbaric people, so what do you expect.

Ken McCracken on June 28, 2006 at 9:39 PM

Well, Khen, I’d say that this really shows how you are not only ignorant as heck but also as prejudiced as they come.  And I would expect nothing more or less from you, Khen.

diane on June 28, 2006 at 09:45 pm
Avatar for diane

“Your first post is just way too long to waste time on Veritas”

Coward.

don’t worry, diane. Just keep telling your friends at Hamas to kill more jews. That way, there won’t be a Palestine in about 2 or 3 weeks.

V

Veritas on June 29, 2006 at 12:35 AM

It seems that the Jews are killing Palestinians 3:1 and Palestinian children are being killed by Israelis as opposed to them killing Israeli children at a rate of 5:1.

And hey, Veritas, once you take everything from a people, such as the Jews have done to the Palestinians, they don’t much give a rat’s arse any more. 

As Dufus said: “Bring it on”. 

I don’t have ‘friends at Hamas’ but I imagine someone of your caliber just ass-umes to be ass-uming; like a sneeze you can’t hold in.

diane on June 28, 2006 at 09:48 pm
Avatar for robert108

Where do you get those ratios?  You just make them up.  The Israelis have created everything they have today.  They started even with the Jordanian refugees, which you call “Palestinians”, and have built a modern, advanced society.  The refugees, on the other hand, playing the victim card you love so well, have done nothing but generate a big garbage dump.  An object lesson, if you have the ability to learn it.

robert108 on June 28, 2006 at 10:06 pm
Avatar for Johnny

Here is the latest article circulating in cyberspace regarding a Manchurian Candidate. It has been forwarded to me at least six times! Any truth to this?

America’s “Wrath of Khaan” – The Truth About Condoleezza Rice

By J. Richard Hollingsworth

The facts fit together like a well-crafted John LeCarre spy novel. While some Americans speculate that presidential candidate Barrack Hussein Obama may be a “Manchurian Candidate”, a close examination of the facts points in another direction. History has shown us that the biggest threats to governments are often not the leaders themselves, but the confidants and closest advisors to the leaders. Consider these facts about American Secretary of State Dr. Condoleezza Rice:

• Her unusual name “Condoleezza”, we are told, is “Italian”. A similar sounding name, Khaandolizhad, is mentioned eighteen times in the Koran, the Muslim Bible. Roughly translated, the name means “(female) servant of Allah”. It is a common name among Muslim women in North Africa. Young Muslim girls with that name often go by the nickname “Khaan” or “Khaandi”, a homonym for “Condi”. Try as I may, I have yet to find a record of an Italian woman named “Condoleezza”.

• No one seems to know the middle name of Dr. Rice. The only information that general searches show is that it may begin with “H”. Tracing back her genealogy, we find several ancestors with the name “Hassan”. Hassan is a North African derivation of the common Middle Eastern name “Hussein”. This is similar to the difference between the English name “Smythe” and the American version “Smith”.

• Dr. Rice has a cousin in Los Angeles who still uses the original version of the surname “Rice”, before it was Americanized decades ago. The cousin, Edward Mustaffa “Rischad”, is a known member of a black Muslim organization in Los Angeles, California. The surname “Rischad” is a shortened version of the North African/Middle Eastern Muslim surname “al-Rischad”. Therefore, using her original names, Dr. Rice would be “Khaandolizhad Hussan al-Rischad”.

• Little is known about the childhood of Condoleezza Rice. Many of the records that would shed some light are not accessible through the Freedom of Information Act. They have been sealed due to Patriot Act restrictions. (Much of the Patriot Act was drafted by Dr. Rice when she was National Security Advisor). It is known however that as a young girl, Condoleezza Rice traveled widely and frequently outside the United States with her parents, often for months at a time. Much of her early schooling took place on foreign soil. She speaks several foreign languages, including Russian and Farsi.

• President George W. Bush had no foreign policy experience upon taking office in 2000 (it should be noted that he had never traveled outside the U.S. prior to his presidency). To remedy this deficiency, a small advisory group was formed to provide intensive education in foreign affairs for Mr. Bush. The group was headed by Dr. Rice. The main topic at most sessions concerned what Dr. Rice called “the growing threat of Iraq”. The threat of Usama bin Laden and al-Qaeda was not discussed.

• Secular Sunni Muslin Saddam Hussein was the sworn enemy of the Shiite Muslim Usama bin Laden.

• Iran was the sworn enemy of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.

• In August of 2001 a memo titled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike Inside U.S.”, written by then U.S. Chief of Counterterrorism Richard A. Clarke, was presented to the National Security Advisor (NSA), Condoleezza Rice. Dr. Rice never passed the memo on to President George W. Bush, citing later that the memo contained “no actionable intelligence”.

• While all air travel in the US was grounded on 9/11, all US based members of Usama bin Laden’s family were allowed to travel by air out of the country. This exception to the air traffic ban was authorized by the National Security Advisor, Condeleezza Rice.

• After 9/11, Dr. Rice was a major force in convincing President Bush that there must be a link between Iraq and al-Qaeda, and that war with Iraq was an absolute necessity.

Was Dr. Khanndolizhad Hussan al-Rischad AKA Condoleezza Rice in collusion with Usama bin Laden and the government of Iran, with the ultimate goal of influencing the President of the United States to use the greatest fighting force in the history of the world to remove the mortal enemy of both bin Laden and Iran? Just a theory, but one that should not be readily dismissed. And remember, insiders say that the most likely 2012 Republican nominee for President will be Dr. Condoleezza Rice.

J. Richard Hollingsworth is a Professor of Middle Eastern Studies at Oxford University. He is a frequent contributor to the weekly London Conservative magazine.

Johnny on August 12, 2008 at 07:09 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.