More Wacky Fun From Turtle Bay

The “poor countries” opposing Sec Gen Annan taking more control of money and operations within the UN is not an all together bad thing. Their reasons are not really all that good, but the results of their actions may well prove to be so.
This story is getting very little attention, kudos to BBC for giving it the few paragraphs they did. Allowing the non-paying members to dictate how much and where funding goes is a bad idea. Allowing Kofi unrestrained control of container ships full of money and materials is an even worse idea. Reform in the operation of the UN is pretty much not going to happen, all the grandstanding and posturing aside. By cutting off the flow of cash, or threatening to do so, reform of a limited nature may result.
It won’t be permanent, or nearly as much as needed, but it will ratchet down the insanity a bit. The sad part in all of this is that the problems most 3rd World countries are facing are rooted in, and exacerbated by, the actions of the UN. Combine that with completely insane leaders such as Mugabe and disaster does shortly ensue. Other than the obvious course of action – breaking up the UN and starting over – what could be done to derail the infinite gravy train with biscuit wheels? Or is it too late?

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array Bat One

    Epicurus,

    Ignoring the fact that any question about the corruption of the UN is at best gratuitous, your comment would presumably mean that so long as any member of such a body is corrupt, then the whole organization would also be. 

    That, in turn, fairly begs the question:  Why bother?  For if there were no corrupt member nations, would there be any substantive purpose for the organization to begin with?

     

  • Epicurus

    The U.N. is no better than the sum of its parts.  If the nations that control it and make it up are corrupt, etc. then it will be corrupt. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    With any luck this will turn into a crisis for the UN and throw the financial situation into serious doubt.

    Either that or we’ll continue to fund a bunch of thugs who sit on a world body and act like statesmen.

  • Bat One

    Epicurus,

    Of course.  And the question is who determines what that international body’s "will" is to be?   We already know who is expected to do the enforcing.

  • Epicurus

    Bat One,

    The point, from the perspective of some, would be able to create an international body which could impose its will on corrupt nations. 

     

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development