Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, February 10, 2006

Milk: Does A Body Bad, Say Scientists

Chicago Tribune

You know it like the Pledge of Allegiance: "Milk helps build strong teeth and bones."

But does it really? Or, as nutrition researchers from Harvard and Cornell Universities are radically suggesting: Have we all been duped by the dairy industry's slick, celebrity-driven "got milk?" advertising campaign?

(...)Last March, the journal Pediatrics published a review article concluding there is "scant evidence" that consuming more milk and dairy products will promote child and adolescent bone health. Some leading practitioners of integrative medicine, including best-selling author Dr. Andrew Weil, suggest eliminating dairy products from the diet to help treat irritable bowel syndrome, asthma, eczema and ear infections.

(...)But researchers Walter Willett, chairman of the department of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health, and T. Colin Campbell, professor emeritus of nutritional biochemistry at Cornell University, say there is little evidence that shows boosting your calcium intake to the currently recommended levels will prevent fractures.

Willett, who co-authored "The Nurses' Health Studies," one of the largest investigations into the risk factors for major chronic diseases in women, found that women with the highest calcium consumption from dairy products actually had substantially more fractures than women who drank less milk.

Campbell, who like Willett comes from a dairy-farming family, found the same thing after spending several decades surveying health-related effects of a plant-based diet and death rates from cancer in more than 2,400 Chinese counties.


This would certainly be big news. I'm obviously not a nutrtionist, but if this all checks out it might lead to a lot more people eliminating milk from their diet, which would cripple the dairy industry and prevent a lot of (apparently unnecessary) suffering. I'm already doing my part.

Comments

Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

I’m not an expert on this stuff so I can’t exactly reply directly to the experts quoted here.  But, I do know that my grandma has always felt that milk was an important party of a healthy diet.  She talks of growing up on the farm her parents homesteaded here in North Dakota and getting milk all the time.

Also, my nephew was very sickly when he was a youngster.  So skinny and so frail.  So the doctor recommended whole milk as part of his diet to help him get healthier, and it did help quite a bit.  He’s still pretty skinny, but he’s also a starter on the high school basketball team.

So, anectdotal evidence to be sure, but I don’t think anyone should stop drinking milk over this.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 10, 2006 at 08:40 am
Avatar for robert108

"Crippling the dairy industry”.  Is that your real agenda, Dave?  You’re such a libertarian!

robert108 on February 10, 2006 at 09:14 am
Avatar for Justin B

Here is an article on another study in 2003 by the same guy:

Harvard University researchers denied this week the charge that they omitted material information from a study they used to scare the public about soft drinks causing diabetes.

Study author Walter Willett told the Washington Post last August, “The message is: Anyone who cares about their health or the health of their family would not consume these beverages. Parents who care about their children’s health should not keep them at home.”

He said the same thing about Soda.  So which is worse Dave?  Why don’t you focus on the evils of Coca Cola and Pepsi first, since last time I checked, the reason we are called mammals is the “mammory glands” that lactate and produce… what the hell do they produce again?  Perhaps milk from cows is not as healthy as milk from say, YOUR MOM (not yours specifically but any hypothetical mom since I have never sampled your mom’s milk--well except that once), but it sure is healthier than a can of Coke.

And before you ween us off the dairy teet, you might want to check and see if babies and children have been drinking milk since, oh, say the time when they started calling us mammals.

Justin B on February 10, 2006 at 09:56 am
Avatar for Robert Perry

Good point about the history of the researcher.  If you want to find out what dieticians say about milk, visit http://www.eatright.org--the website of the American Dietetic Association.

You can get a heck of an argument either way on dairy.  Most non-caucasians can’t take it after about age 5 very well.  Many caucasians cannot, either.  On the other hand, the balance of minerals found in milk matches that in bones--so at least for children, it’s ideal.

There are any number of other arguments based on protein leaching, alternative sources, and exercise--which has far more to do with bone density than diet, for what it’s worth.  Use your bones and they grow stronger.  Sit on your duff like I’m doing now and they weaken, no matter what your diet.

So is dairy necessary?  No, but keep your cotton-pickin’ hands off my Breyer’s!  :^)

Robert Perry on February 10, 2006 at 10:26 am
Avatar for Tonikem

I’ve been saying for years that milk is unhealthy. 

Milk may contain calcium, but it also contains a lot of fat (good recommendation for the skinny kid to drink it). 

Here’s some more annecdotal evidence:  did you ever notice that fat people - especially kids - drink a lot of milk?  I used to work in a grocery store where I saw fat people buying rediculous amounts of milk, and I was also in a boy scout troop where I watched fat kids guzzle milk like water.

In addition, humans are the only animals that drink the milk of another (cows), and we’re the only ones that drink it beyond infancy.

Like the others, I’m no expert on the subject, but that’s just something to think about.

Tonikem on February 10, 2006 at 10:59 am
Avatar for kbiel

Willett, who co-authored “The Nurses’ Health Studies,” one of the largest investigations into the risk factors for major chronic diseases in women, found that women with the highest calcium consumption from dairy products actually had substantially more fractures than women who drank less milk.

This is the problem with correlation studies: what is the causation?  Did higher calcium intake cause these women to have bone density loss or could it be that their doctors told them to take more calcium after they started having bone fractures?

kbiel on February 10, 2006 at 11:17 am
Avatar for C-Mom

Sure, Ilove the occasional milkshake as much as the next guy, but otherwise, I’ve never been much of a milk drinker.

A baby needs a lot of fat for brain development, but after that...?

Once my kids hit two, I cut them down to one glass a day. They seem healthy to me!

C-Mom on February 10, 2006 at 11:31 am

robert108 wrote:

“Crippling the dairy industry”. Is that your real agenda, Dave? You’re such a libertarian!

One of my key libertarian beliefs is that the free people making free choices (ie, not the government) is all that is needed for unethical companies to go out of business.

For example, if Wal-Mart wanted to start hiring 10-year-olds to stock their shelves and pay them 10 cents an hour, I wouldn’t want the government to tell them they couldn’t. Why? Because it wouldn’t be necessary. Consumers--the free market--would stop shopping at Wal-Mart, crippling their child-labor industry. The free market will have done its job.

That’s all I’m saying abou the dairy industry. The liberal perspective would be for the government to intervene and shut them down. The libertarian perspective (at least, the animal welfare libertarian perspective) would be to hope enough people turn vegan to make dairy farms unprofitable, and thus close down.

I’m sure McDonalds wants Burger King to go out of business, because that will increase McDonalds’ sales, but I highly doubt you’d call McDonalds liberal, would you?

Dave on February 10, 2006 at 12:11 pm
Avatar for Sigivald

Tonikem: We’re also the only animals with thumbs, and that domesticate other animals. I daresay that if various other animals had any way to do so they’d happily drink the milk of other species, as an efficient means of energy acquisition.

Until other species manage domestication, however, this is unlikely to occur.

(My point being that “humans are the only animal that...” is no real argument for or against whatever it is we uniquely do.)

I don’t care about milk drinking, but I do care about cheese. Sweet, delicious, life-giving Cheese, proof of God’s existence and benevolence…

Sigivald on February 10, 2006 at 12:16 pm

Can someone please explain to me how to use HTML tags? I could do it on the old system..... :(

Dave on February 10, 2006 at 12:21 pm
Avatar for robert108

Dave: You are such the vegan evangelist!  I doubt that McDonald’s wants Burger King to go out of business; they just want to make more profit by selling more product.  You also neglect the suffering caused by the shutdown of the dairy industry.  It would increase human suffering by quite a bit, but that doesn’t seem to matter to you.  Since WalMart doesn’t employ 10 year olds, your example is nonsensical.  Besides, their parents wouldn’t let them.  It’s not economic, it’s cultural.  I have milked dairy cows, btw, and they seem to enjoy it.  It might increase their suffering not to get milked.  Ever think of that?

robert108 on February 10, 2006 at 01:03 pm
Avatar for docdave

There’s milk and then there is real milk.  The milk that most of us drink is pasteurized and homogenized, a heating process that destroys most if not all the natural nutrients contained in fresh milk.  Vitamins and minerals are artificially added to the finished product to give it the pretense of something beneficial.

Any of you that have ever drank fresh dairy milk can tell the difference.

docdave on February 10, 2006 at 02:32 pm
Avatar for Justin B

For example, if Wal-Mart wanted to [offer xyz set of employee benefits] to stock their shelves and [pay them less than $12] an hour, I wouldn’t want the government to tell them they couldn’t.

The liberal perspective would be for the government to intervene and shut them down. The libertarian perspective (at least, the animal welfare libertarian perspective) would be to hope enough people turn vegan to make dairy farms unprofitable, and thus close down.

So, then what Maryland did was wrong by your standards?  Where are you at crusading against the evils of the Maryland decision on Walmart.  Get your libertarian buddies together and stop these fools in charge of government form harming Walmart.

Justin B on February 10, 2006 at 03:47 pm

Robert108: If you had lived in 1830, would you have bought cotton that was picked by slaves?

You see, I wouldn’t, with the belief that if enough people followed suit slavery would end because it would simply become unprofitable.

I apply that exact same mindset to the dairy industry.

Dave on February 10, 2006 at 08:35 pm
Avatar for robert108

Dave: Your hypotheticals are funny, but that’s about it.  You still don’t seem to be able to get a simple truth: Humans are not cows!  BTW, speaking from experience, both cows and human females like to be milked, but for entirely different reasons. I can’t account for your mindset, I just don’t agree with it. Your equivalences just don’t make any sense.

robert108 on February 10, 2006 at 10:24 pm

From your lack of a response, I take it you WOULD have bought cotton made from slave labor, which explains wonders about your mindset.

Dave on February 11, 2006 at 06:37 am
Avatar for docdave

From milk to cotton, how you all have strayed.  For those that don’t know history, the purchasers of cotton didn’t much care how it was harvested.  If the subject is southern cotton, the northern anti-slavery states wanted the cotton for their fledgeling textile industries at a favorable price so they could compete with the British textile industry who was the principle customer of southern cotton.

docdave on February 11, 2006 at 07:17 am
Avatar for Samantha

Any of you that have ever drank fresh dairy milk can tell the difference.

For this reason I stopped drinking milk after my family moved to the US. After drinking fresh milk from my grandfather’s cattle that my grandmother had pasturised at the kitchen stove the stuff in your average American grocery store tasted like dirty water.

I was always suspicious of the dairy industry so enthusiastically proclaiming that their product was all that and a bag of chips. What else were they going to say about it, “Our stuff’s really not that good for you but please drink it any way?”

I don’t care about milk drinking, but I do care about cheese. Sweet, delicious, life-giving Cheese, proof of God’s existence and benevolence...

Don’t forget butter. Sweet, salty, homemade butter, mmmm…

Samantha on February 11, 2006 at 09:30 am
Avatar for robert108

Dave: I’m not responsible for your assumptions.  As I said before, your hypothetical is nonsensical.  If you had been alive in 1830, what would you have done?  How could you know?  Would you have been blogging then?

robert108 on February 11, 2006 at 10:13 am
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

Dave, no matter how you try to twist it dairy cows are not equivalent to human plantation slaves.

It just doesn’t work that way.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 11, 2006 at 10:36 am
Avatar for WTFman

WTF i drink like 10 glassed of milk a day the last thing i need to hear is that it is bad for my bones. can this actualy be true because i cant stop drinking milk its the best.(by the way im not fat)

WTFman on September 2, 2006 at 08:57 pm
Avatar for genesis nutrition

I don’t think there are that many people out there that drink milk because it should harden their bones. Maybe there are a lot that started with this pretext. But drinking milk is a real pleasure like any other and not a pretext for a stronger body. A healthier one maybe (I’m talking about unpasteurized milk).

genesis nutrition on September 25, 2007 at 04:38 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.