Mike Huckabee Would Like To Outlaw Political Criticism Not Approved By The Candidates

In other words, Huckabee would like to outlaw free speech. During an interview on NPR’s Morning Edition Huckabee responded to accusations of push-polling in South Carolina by saying that he’s not associated with the pollsters and that he doesn’t like what they’re doing in his name. He also claims that there’s nothing he can do to stop them.
Now that comes off as true enough. Huckabee obviously can’t control every group that’s out there, but it’s also a little disingenuous as Huck hasn’t exactly done much to condemn the activity either. He’s responded to it when asked, but he hasn’t been pro-active in going after these dirty tricksters which leaves me inclined to believe that Huckabee is fine with benefiting from their dirty tricks even if he doesn’t want to associate himself with them personally.
Plus, Huckabee goes a step too far in actually calling for an end to all political speech from independent political groups. Which probably isn’t surprising given the barrage of criticism Huckabee has taken from such groups of the fiscally conservative persuasion.
Here’s the audio from the interview (I apologize for the crappy quality, I can’t figure out why NPR can take my tax dollars but I can’t download a bit of their audio if I want to):

“I personally wish that all of this was outlawed. I think that every candidates should speak for themselves, and that every thing that involves the candidate’s name or another candidate’s name should be authorized and approved by that candidate, otherwise it shouldn’t be spoken…. The point is that candidates can’t force these special interest 527 groups to stop. I wish we could.”

Now, to be fair, what Huck clearly wants outlawed here is independent groups doing things in a candidate’s name. Such as push polling. But when pressed on the issue, he goes too far and calls for an end to free political speech from independent groups in general.
That, clearly, is a problem.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    In America, where there is unconditional religious freedom, any criticism based on a person’s choice of religion is strictly off limits.

    No it’s not. We do it each and every day at this website.

    People can chose their religions. Such a choice is not “strictly off limits”.

  • Jeugenen

    HUCKABEE’S INQUISITION OF ROMNEY

    “Are Jesus and Satan Brothers?” is a systematic attempt to incite religious strife, an inexcusable violation of the spirit of the sacred Constitution of the American People. In America, where there is unconditional religious freedom, any criticism based on a person’s choice of religion is strictly off limits.

    Can any candidate who is so disloyal to his own constitution ever be trusted to be loyal to the American People?

    Can any candidate who is so lacking in sensibility and common decency ever be trusted with the leadership of the America People?

    Does Huckabee sometimes cut deals with his Satan in his quest for riches and power; and what does his Christian God have to say about this kind of behavior?

    Religious questions into the moral and ethical behavior of candidates are not critical of the religion itself; but are crucial questions about the character of the candidate, because a candidate who dishonors his God will dishonor his American Constitution and his promises to the American People.

  • brenarlo

    I’m sure I’ll get called every name in the book after saying this, but Fred Thompson also supported the silencing of political speech when he openly advocated for McCain-Feingold.

    And… before you say that he doesn’t support that position anymore, I will direct you to an article written by John Gizzi from September where Thompson states that he was proud of his work on McCain-Feingold. In that article he also says that limiting political ads hasn’t worked out.

    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=22525

    I have serious questions about his willingness to suppress free speech. In addition, his political ad limitation bill has made it HARDER for challengers, not easier.

    Thompson was also not just a “yes” vote. According to McCain, he was critical to its passing.

    http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/5/29/133920.shtml?s=al&promo_code=34AB-1

    So, I’m not sure I see any difference between what Thompson did and what Huckabee is advocating.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Yeah, Thompson’s support for McCain/Feingold sucks. I’ve criticized him for it in the past. He’s repudiated his position, and given that his record is sterling in other regards I’m willing to take his word on this issue.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development