Say Anything Blog

Michelle Obama has said “NO” to offering the VP slot to Hillary Clinton:

Probably wants Barack to live until Inauguration Day! Heh.

Those who think the party or the country, will be “taught a lesson” by handing the levers of power over to the liberals will learn a lesson, but it will be at the expense of our country and her liberties. And there are no guarantees that the party or the country will come out stronger, more conservative or better positioned to win elections against the incumbent liberals.

Yeah, Michelle Obama won’t be able to connect with blue-collar Americans. She won’t be able to compare with Cindy McCain since she comes such humble beginnings.

Michelle Obama has said “NO” to offering the VP slot to Hillary Clinton:

As I had previously posted, Michelle is pulling pinochio’s strings.

Being liberal is never having to admit you’re wrong

I find Michelle views just as troubling as Baracks. Yikes I can’t imagine an nation with those two at the helm. You won’t be able to question them, all you will ever hear is that is out of line. Yesh…

check out Goon’s World

Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck

goon, all questions to the Obama’s will be routed to Wright and his associate Ayers.

Being liberal is never having to admit you’re wrong

I am wondering if Wright will be given a spot in his administration.

check out Goon’s World

Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck

Or imagine William Ayers as a Federal judge?

Those who think the party or the country, will be “taught a lesson” by handing the levers of power over to the liberals will learn a lesson, but it will be at the expense of our country and her liberties. And there are no guarantees that the party or the country will come out stronger, more conservative or better positioned to win elections against the incumbent liberals.

If you think Hillary was the power behind the throne during the Clinton years, just wait until THIS one gets in the White House.

Election ‘08 - We Are So Screwed

Michelle may actually have higher unfavorables than Hillary.

""That’s the problem with you lefties, you’re not willing to get your hands dirty. I’d suggest you roll up your sleeves.”

-Jack Bauer

Putting Hillary and Barack together would be like a living Itchy and Scratchy cartoon.

Mickey:

Perfect! About a million years ago Mad Magazine’s Don Martin had two characters who would fit as well: Fester Bestertester and His Sidekick Karbuncle.

I got sent home from school because in my freshman bookeeping class (which bored me to tears) I had a copy of that magazine tucked into a bookkeeping workbook and couldn’t keep myself from laughing at it when I was supposed to be doing, well, bookkeeping stuff. Mt blue haired teacher was outraged.

I went fishing that day. It’s a fond memory, courtesy of Mad Magazine.

Election ‘08 - We Are So Screwed

Otis Moss?  He’d be a lot better off with Otis Day!

I am wondering if Wright will be given a spot in his administration.

I’m predicting William Ayers as Secretary of Education...or someone who shares Ayers views on education.

Imagining the MO and Hillary Itchy and Scratchy show is priceless! HA…

I 100% agree with your post Bat One…

Whereas Obama is slightly conscious that his facade is all in the name of gaining power, Michelle Obama believes the facade to be the essence to be real and thus be the power!

Bat One, you said it yourself…

Michelle, a true believer, takes the wheel.

Has anyone seen the play MACBETH?

Eventually, they’re both going to see the blood on their hands and have a mental break-down!  And in just the same paralell, Michelle is the one motivating Obama to do all the campaigning (killing).

It’s a stretch I know, but the evidence does seem to be pointing to such a bogus conclusion.

On a serious note: I think Michelle has a lot of power over her husband.

Strong intelligent women just scare the beejeezes outta the rednecks, don’t they?

That’s a HUGE generalization Jack, and you’re directing it at the wrong people.  We’re not no-brain conservatives.

Women have not always been in the liberal perspective they have now, and they have not always been oppressed into submission either.

Women lived secondary roles BY choice.

The subject of women is personal, deep, and complex.  So I’ll save the lecture and discussion, especially because you’re only at the “ake-angry-generalizations-stage

Women lived secondary roles BY choice.

You keep telling yourself that, kid. Just don’t expect any sane person to believe you.

Jack.  I’ve met a woman, valet victorian of her high school, double-major, Secretary of College Republicans
say that she wants to be a housewife with a man who is nothing short of amazing.

That is by choice.

That is by choice.

So is wearing a burkka

Look, Jack, I’m not for keeping women stupid, by all means I want them happy and in a natural order, but I think you will always misunderstand me and the others here at SAB (for the time being) because you have come here predisposed to frustration.

Open your mind, take a deep breath, and engage in intellectual conversation.

Look, Jack, I’m not for keeping women stupid, by all means I want them happy and in a natural order…

“Natural order” is just right-wing code for “get your ass back in the kitchen and make babies!”

You claim that being inferior to men is the “natural order” for women. How can I have an intelligent conversation with someone like that?

That comment is inane. You ignored my evidence of your previous assertion of my being insane because all women do not WANT to live a secondary role which I just proved to be untrue.

I gave a clearcut example of an INTELLIGENT and respectable women wanting to live a secondary role.  She was actually one of the most respectable women I’ve ever met.  Compared to more promiscous less educated ones, who often attempt to domineer their spouses.

You’re being rude and presumptious.  You have become the exact enemy you are trying to eliminate and are doing more damage than good. I’m sorry.

Dirl: Feed the trolls at your own discretion, but don’t expect to turn that sow’s ear of reading mis-comprehension into the silk purse of sweet reason any time soon!

Those who think the party or the country, will be “taught a lesson” by handing the levers of power over to the liberals will learn a lesson, but it will be at the expense of our country and her liberties. And there are no guarantees that the party or the country will come out stronger, more conservative or better positioned to win elections against the incumbent liberals.

Natural, Definiton:

Based on innate moral feeling of humankind.

You took my words into context of being in the kitchen instead.

I told you, we’re not no-brain conservatives, so defining everything amongst the “right-wing code” won’t work.

Haha! : ) Thanks Proof!

You ignored my evidence blah blah blah…

First off all you didn’t offer evidence, you offered an antecdote. I don’t expect you or proof to understand the differnce, but there it is.

Secondly, you claim that since one woman WANTS to be inferior therefore ALL women are inferior to men.

Your primary thesis---that women live only to serve men, their lord and masters---is just too crazy to have an intelligent conversation about. We’ll just have to agree to disagree.

Natural, Definiton:

Based on innate moral feeling of humankind.

So you know know the “innate moral feeling” of the entire species? How arrogant of you to claim superior moral knowledge over every person on the planet.

You took my words into context of being in the kitchen instead.

It’s called a metaphor, and it went whizzing over your head.

I told you, we’re not no-brain conservatives…

Um...yes, you are. Sorry.

Secondly, you claim that since one woman WANTS to be inferior therefore ALL women are inferior to men.

Your primary thesis---that women live only to serve men, their lord and masters---is just too crazy to have an intelligent conversation about. We’ll just have to agree to disagree.

jack,

Reading through the entire thread, I don’t see where anyone has claimed either of your theses.  Are you in the habit of making up stupid shit as a diversion whenever you find yourself at a loss for something cogent to say, or is this a congenital disability of which we should be aware so as not to embarrass you by making fun?

“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Reading through the entire thread, I don’t see where anyone has claimed either of your theses.

I think he was taking umbrage at people disliking the opinions of Michelle Obama.  Especially in view of the fact she is a woman and therefore represents (for the sake of this election) ALL women.  Therefore, any disparaging remark is, a priori, demeaning to ALL women. 

dirl, given that he based his assessment off of the ONE suitable example any counter examples by you are obviously wrong or not really women.  (Obviously it’s open season on Hillary.)

jack - Um...yes, you are. Sorry.

That’s pretty ballsy to say considering that you’ve been reading what isn’t there and assuming the rest.