Michelle Malking Gone Wild!

  •  September 30, 2006

String bikini!

image

Well, unfortunately for we Malkin fans, that’s not her. Instead it’s a bogus photoshopped image being distributed by some of Malkin’s critics who, apparently tired of contending with her in an intellectual manner, have decided to attack her in a personal manner by portraying her as some sort of hussy or something.
Really, would it matter if that were Malkin in the bikini? I thought we right-wingers were supposed to be the prudish, up-tight ones.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array carrick

    The head size is entirely wrong, and the splice point is obvious. It’s actually a pretty crappy photoshopping.

    That woman is also very tall like 2H9 points out.

    Anyway, I think that this may be the original. Not sure.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    2h9:

    First of all type the words that you want to be the link.

    2. Open the page you want linked and use the right click to copy the address.

    3. Go back to the comment and highlight the words you want to be the link.

    4. Then click the button. (That’s the HTML code for linking)

    5. Use the right click to paste your link info. You have to make sure that the info in the box to start with is highlighted as you want it to be replaced with your info.

    You can click the preview button and check to see that your link worked.

  • 2Hotel9

    I saw this awhile back, did not think it was her. She is fairly short, and that chick is faily tall, and a bit heavier. That looks like a GE or Frigidaire refrigerator beside her, they are around 6 feet tall, making her 6′ or 6’2″. Michelle ain’t that tall. She more the classic LBFM.

  • Reed

    This kind of stuff is so stupid and childish.

    If it really was her, I could care less that she was in a bikini. Are bikini’s forbidden these days?

    It is sad the levels some people stoop to these days

  • 2Hotel9

    Thanks, Toot! I was just getting with the program in the old format. I tried using the @ but it was not the ticket, obviously. Thankfully, the set up in reader blogs is like the old format was here. And now if it changes I will be hip to the deal. An example is in order.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Even if it were real and there was a picture of her in beachwear…what would be the big deal?

    I for one wouldn’t be offended.

  • Pilgrim

    These people never cease to amaze and amuse. The best smear they can come up with is a (photoshopped) picture of someone they hate in a bikini? Oh, lawdy Jesus, the shame of it all!!! A picture of someone in (dramatic pause) BEACHWEAR!!!! That’ll show those mean ol’ conservatives a thing or two. Yep.

    Puh-leeeze.

  • carrick

    Good Ol’ Boy, I’ll be honest that it’s a photoshop, using this as a source. Somebody (NOT the Captain) are photogenic enough, in a certain way.

  • aNONOMISLY

    talking about Republican girl pundits, ..

    how about we start a draft to get Ann Coulter to run for her district (FL-16, Palm Spring) now open seat?

  • http://boyddrivefollies.blogspot.com/ Good Ol’ Boy

    Carrick- That’s nasty-ick. As far as the other photo- yeah it’s fake, and I say so what, too. No one can take pictures inside a house nowadays? Liberal hypocrites. Feh.

  • 2Hotel9

    Thank you, so very, very much!

  • 2Hotel9

    The Dissidentfrogman Has a good piece on photoshopping, August 15th. He goes through how the process is done, also another from July, I believe. [email=http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/dacha/001598.html]http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/dacha/001598.html[/email]This should get you to it.

  • 2Hotel9

    OK, for some reason that does not work. What am I doing wrong this time?

  • carrick

    That’s what I’m sayin’

  • robert108

    It’s a great example of how lefties don’t practice what they preach, which is tolerance and diversity, and they certainly don’t preach what they practice, which is Marxism.

  • 2Hotel9

    OK, I give in. How do you link now?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I think Allah over at Hot Air highlighted the absurdity of this best:

    Here’s the column Michelle wrote about Charlotte Church that inspired all this, by the way. Or rather, here’s the column Michelle wrote about Charlotte Church that Muller and Layne used as a pretext to run that photoshop of Michelle. It’s “hypocritical,” you see, for a woman who’s worn a bikini to criticize celebrities for selling sex to children. Why? Because women who wear bikinis are whores.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    That’s hot.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development