I wonder how long it will take WOOF and Don to post some sort of lame excuse for for this?

And while we’re on the subject of leftwing intolerance, leftwing ugliness, and leftwing hate and bile, when was the last time a bunch of conservatives physically attacked a liberal speaker, as has happened to Malkin, Coulter, Wolfowitz, Horowitz and Buchanan? 

"This hate was directed toward the very students Michelle Malkin criticized."

Obviously the way to deal with those "students" isn’t to criticize them publicly, but to take away their student loans instead.  If the Solomon Amendment is constitutional as it is applied to institutions of "higher learning" perhaps its ought to be applied to the individual students as well.  That "free speech" "chilling effect" argument didn’t work all that well in F.A.I.R v. Rumsfeld.  I can’t see that it should be any different here. 

Did the Hippies beat up the soldiers. I didn’t read that. Did they force the recruiters to leave.? No.

Peaceful protest. An American right. 

Little LuLu did post the names and home phone numbers of the protesters.

Thei got dreath threats .

So Lu Lu got some nasty Emails. Poor unethical,not yet a  journalist  Lu Lu.

 

"…So Lu Lu got some nasty Emails. Poor unethical,not yet a  journalist  Lu Lu."

Never one to rise above the nadir of other’s expectations, WOOF arrives right on cue.

Free,

Pay attention to WOOF’s mindless comment above.  There is a difference between "snide" and "sarcastic."  In excusing the abominable behavior of his fellow hate-spewing progressives, all as predicted, WOOF is being snide.  He does so because he simply doesn’t have the mental acuity to make a reasoned argument in their defense, nor the courage to decry their behavior.  So instead, he attacks the person, in this case Michelle Malkin as a means of defending the indefensible.  His comment is devoid of any sort of intellectual musculature.  There is no substantive structure or reason to what he says, merely a vain attempt at spiteful humor.

It is what one would expect from an intellectual capon.  Thus the term snide, rather than the more intellectually substantive "sarcastic." 

likwidshoe wrote: 

Rob didn’t write that. We don’t know who wrote that because all of the authors other than Rob were lost in the switchover from WordPress to MovableType. Kind of ticks me off.

Ah, thanks, I didn’t even catch that. I should be more careful next time. Though, I should point out, I’m almost certain that was Rob’s post…I seem to remember it from back then.

She was dead wrong to post personal phone numbers.

How? The protestors posted their phone numbers in their press release. At that point, they’re no longer "personal"; they’re in the public domain.

 Malkin was, however, while not "dead wrong," very silly for, immediately after accusing the protestors of "sedition" and posting their phone numbers, writing:

If you are contacting them, I do not condone death threats or foul language.

Yeah….like she was just hoping her readers would engage in civil conversation.

WOOF said, She was dead wrong to post personal phone numbers.

You mean the phone numbers posted here and listed as the "ad-hoc press team"?

What’s wrong about posting the "press team’s" phone numbers?

Wait to you hear her squeal when hers are posted.

Her personal phone number isn’t a "press team" phone number. Did your immaturity blind you to that fact?

Sam Aranke – 714-458-2471 – saranke@ucsc.edu
David Zlutnick – 805-698-6228 – dzlutnic@ucsc.edu
Janine Carmona – 707-496-3530 – jgcarmon@ucsc.edu

Now cry about it you silly little child.

Dave said, Though, I should point out, I’m almost certain that was Rob’s post…I seem to remember it from back then.

No. It wasn’t. It was either from Robert from Lime Shurbet, Raina, Preston from Six Meat Buffet, or Aaron. It wasn’t from Rob. I was editting and fixing code.

Uh, maybe she actually DOES hope they contact them without death threats or vulgarities.

 

Code Of Ethics for the Society of Professional Journalists

Ethical journalists treat sources, subjects and colleagues as human beings deserving of respect.

Journalists should:

 

• Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by news coverage. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and inexperienced sources or subjects. &heellip;
• Recognize that gathering and reporting information may cause harm or discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance.
• Recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone’s privacy.

Payback’s a Bitch.

And you lose.

themole’s IP address is 87.208.4.XXX

Isn’t your game fun?

Boo – Fucking – Hoo.

Well isn’t that special?

[Edit]: The point is clear without the IP.

Oh wow Dave, you found some hate-filled quotes from some conservatives!

I admit that those on the right can hate.

Now, will you admit that ‘liberal tolerance’ is a silly myth?

My husband said those are badges of honor! He told me the other night when Michael the Britt refered to me as an "illiterate prostitute"… Even still, the kind of descriptions Michell was refered to is more racist and degrading than me being refered to as an illiterate prostitute. Michell is awesome and her intelligence is probably so excruciating to that type of individual that personal insults are all the ammo they have to give. Much of the left’s hatred towards conservatives is usually because their argument lacks and is insufficient. The capacity for a civil debate is unequal when the leftist put what they call values out there. I certainly wouldn’t want to go up against Michell Malkin! Not all Lefties are insulting and rude, BUT, sometimes we all need to stop and think about who and what we are representing.

Oh wow Dave, you found some hate-filled quotes from some conservatives!

This hate was directed toward the very students Michelle Malkin criticized. It goes both ways.

Dear Friends:

I came to this blog as a friend of one of the young students in question to try to understand what is going on and why my friend who is trying to be a responsible and passionate participant in the national debate is suffering personal attack and violent threats for her beliefs.

I am sorry not to see stronger statements from conservatives  denouncing the angry, violent, and ignorant language of other conservatives.

 I am saddened not to see stronger statements from liberals denouncing angry, violent and ignorant language from other liberals.

 I am saddened to read a string of name-calling posts with virtually no intellectual content, no evidence of listening, all trying to acheive a single goal to convince others that one side is right and moral and the other side is some kind of moral pervert lacking human intelligence.

The agruments are not convincing in either case.

Friends, if we want to be a beacon for peace, for justice, for democracy or any other value that we cherish, we must have both our actions and our speach in the world reflect our deepest beliefs.

My deepest wish is that the name calling would stop.  These are important issues.  People are killing others and being killed.  The lives of the Iraqui people, the lives of many average Americans, our ability to live together with each other is at stake.

The nasty language on this thread and all accross the webworld poisons our ability to know truth, to love justice, and to walk humbly.  The values that you profess are being trampelled — not by your adversary on this list, but by yourself.

My friend is ok.  I trust that the students at UCSC will be safe.  I trust that the effort to bring America back to its true values will go on and that those who want to live in peace with their enemies will find ways to do that.

My current sense is that the best way to do that is to sign off of the weblogs, invite someone you don’t agree with to go out for pizza and bowling, seek to be just in your daily actions, and care for those who are affected by your words.

Just a thought.  With well wishes.

 

Actually, this incident proves that liberal moonbats are learning.  One time before, a detractor of Mrs. Malkin wrote from his work address and found out the hard way that employers don’t like to have the company name associated with vulgar terms for female genitalia.

Abusing admin privileges again Lik?

Just jumping in and playing the game that some like to play on others. If you don’t like it, as themole would say, "Boo – Fucking – Hoo".

I won’t bother unsubscribing to this thread, I know you’ll take care of that for me.

Only if you ask for it again.

"Never one to rise above the nadir of other’s expectations, WOOF arrives right on cue." 

Bet that one sent WOOF looking for his dictionary.