Say Anything Blog

A Weather Channel meteorologist has been causing quite a stir recently with her proclamation that any one in the climate sciences who questions global warming should have their accreditation removed:

  A leading climatologist on the Weather Channel in the United States has caused a squall in the industry by arguing that any weather forecaster who dares publicly to question the notion that global warming is a manmade phenomenon should be stripped of their professional certification.

  The call was made by Heidi Cullen, host of a weekly global warming programme on the cable network called The Climate Code, and coincides with a stretch of severely off-kilter weather across the US this winter and moves by Democrats to draft strict new legislation to curb greenhouse gas emissions.

  Specifically, Ms Cullen is suggesting that the American Meteorological Society (AMS) revokes the “seal of approval” that it normally extends to broadcast forecasters in the US in cases where they have expressed scepticism about man’s role in pushing up planetary temperatures.

  “It’s like allowing a meteorologist to go on-air and say that hurricanes rotate clockwise and tsunamis are caused by the weather,” she wrote in her internet blog. “It’s not a political statement… it’s just an incorrect statement.”

Thankfully, some meteorologists (James Spann) aren’t taking this heavy-handed, almost Stalin-esque tactic laying down:

Well, well. Some “climate expert” on “The Weather Channel” wants to take away AMS certification from those of us who believe the recent “global warming” is a natural process. So much for “tolerance”, huh?

I have been in operational meteorology since 1978, and I know dozens and dozens of broadcast meteorologists all over the country. Our big job: look at a large volume of raw data and come up with a public weather forecast for the next seven days. I do not know of a single TV meteorologist who buys into the man-made global warming hype. I know there must be a few out there, but I can’t find them. Here are the basic facts you need to know:

*Billions of dollars of grant money is flowing into the pockets of those on the man-made global warming bandwagon. No man-made global warming, the money dries up. This is big money, make no mistake about it. Always follow the money trail and it tells a story. Even the lady at “The Weather Channel” probably gets paid good money for a prime time show on climate change. No man-made global warming, no show, and no salary. Nothing wrong with making money at all, but when money becomes the motivation for a scientific conclusion, then we have a problem. For many, global warming is a big cash grab.

*The climate of this planet has been changing since God put the planet here. It will always change, and the warming in the last 10 years is not much difference than the warming we saw in the 1930s and other decades. And, lets not forget we are at the end of the ice age in which ice covered most of North America and Northern Europe.

If you don’t like to listen to me, find another meteorologist with no tie to grant money for research on the subject. I would not listen to anyone that is a politician, a journalist, or someone in science who is generating revenue from this issue.

Personally, I’m a little tired of global warming zealots on the left bad mouthing anyone who doesn’t buy 100% into the dogma they’re selling.  I think we can all agree (because it’s a fact) that global temperatures have been rising recently.  But the problem is how do we know it’s being caused by human activity?  And how do we know we can do anything to stop it, especially when it now appears as though one of the worst emitters of the gases that allegedly cause global warming aren’t even human but rather bovine?

How do we really know that it’s not part of another temperature change trend that has been taking place on this earth for billions of years?  Entire eons before humans even came around?

Global warming zealots like Al Gore like to talk a lot about “inconvenient truths,” but I’d like to see those same zealots answers some of the questions above which are very inconvenient to their beliefs.

And speaking of beliefs, I think every single person on the left who thinks someone who doesn’t 100% buy into their global warming theories is “crazy” or “stupid” should keep their mouths shut when it comes to another topic much-maligned by liberals.  Namely, religion.  These global warming people are every bit as arrogant and self-important as the religious zealots who would force prayer or bible teachings on all of our kids in public schools.