Meagan (sic) chose to make the issue about his remarks about Fox News.

Maybe because he kept nattering on about Fox News and their “agenda”.

Please note: pathetic drunken squirrel troll cannot learn even when corrected!

This is a win for the Obama camp.

Retreat and declare “victory”? Sounds about like an Obama administration!

That is exactly what I saw from Meagan (sic)

This may be a new record for Haphazardlies! He had to scroll past two whole comments before he managed to misspell and mangle Megyn’s name! Heh.

He believes “sharing the wealth” is “good for everyone”.

Everyone believe is “sharing the wealth” as you narrowly understand the term. Trickle down economics is “sharing the wealth”.

You are lost in the weeds Robert. Was the discussion Barack Obama was participating in a topic on the victories, challenges and failures of the civil rights movement, yes or no?

The answer is yes. I don’t trust you to answer the question honestly.

Sarah Palin is the most socialist governor in the US.

Another leftie lie.

The spin machine seems especially hung up on Obama’s use of the word “tragedy,”

Whereas Hannitized gets hung up on any word larger than “a”!

ashley: Please feel free to ignore his babbling…unless it’s to taunt him with his own ignorance. That can be amusing! He got hung up on the word “camp” over a month ago and still hasn’t gotten it right! Even the word “yet” seems to be “above his paygrade”. Like idol like sycophant, I guess!

The lying crapweasel kept accusing Megyn of “giving a political speech”(on her own show), when that is all he did during the whole interview. He just kept droning his lying talking points the whole time. Lefties always accuse others of doing what they are, in fact, doing.
They try to bully, then when that fails, they cry like little bitches.

Hannitized… sorry your argument didn’t just didn’t stand up… from everything Obama has said and stands for… it is clear to me that he wants a Socialist America!!!! I am not in the business of handing money to those who already don’t pay taxes… as I said before… it doesn’t even help the low income households… it is just enough to keep the poor, poor… instead of promoting hard work to better themselves!!! I have some friends in England who hate the health care system there… it can take a year to get the surgery you need…and it will just start there…I can’t figure out for the life of me why anyone would want more government control???? And taxes are just the beginning… Obama is not just a democrat… Obama is a man with radical views and associations… he wants control and he has a chip in his shoulder… not a good combo!!!!!

ASK YOURSELF… what did Obama mean when he, is his own words and audio recorded with his own voice, talked very clearly about the redistribution of wealth??? answer that question for me… then what was he talking about??? Please I’m serious any Obama supporter can answer for me…

I am not sure how they can spin this as desperate, these are BHO’s words.

Let Obama set an example by spreading his wealth around.

(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.

This is from Dictionary.com

Socialism per Dictionary.com

(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.

Sarah Palin is the most socialist governor in the US. After all, her state publicly owns its oil fields, it leases those fields to oil companies and the state provides each Alaskan with a check from the rent the state charges the oil companies.

If Palin wanted a true capitalistic arrangement, she would support selling the oil fields to private concerns. But she doesn’t.

Responding to a question from a girl who wants to know why her her father, a doctor, pays a higher tax rate than people who earn less:

McCain: “I think it’s to some degree because we feel, obviously, that wealthy people can afford more.”

Doctor’s daughter: Aren’t we getting closer and closer to, like, socialism and stuff?

McCain: “Here’s what I really believe. When you are, reach a certain level of comfort, there is nothing wrong with paying somewhat more.”

Maybe this should be the let’s forget the facts and jump on the stereotype blog? From the previous comments I think it may be more appropriate.

You gotta hand it to the salesman, he’s good! No matter what you throw at those guys, they just slink right past.

Can Megan run? She’s a badass.

ASK YOURSELF… what did Obama mean when he, is his own words and audio recorded with his own voice, talked very clearly about the redistribution of wealth??? answer that question for me… then what was he talking about??? Please I’m serious any Obama supporter can answer for me…

Hello Ashley,

Thank you for the opportunity to answer your questions. My first response to you is to ask you to look deeper into the information that you have been fed by Fox News, Drudge and McCain camp are presenting you.

What Obama was talking about was the victories, challenges and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court.

What the editors and spin masters of all of the three organizations are telling you is the exact opposite of what Obama said;

When a caller inquired about whether the courts are the appropriate mechanism for socio-economic progress, Obama said remedies should come through legislation, not the judiciary.

His argument included some basic ideas that Republicans need not find controversial. The courts have never played a role in improving economic conditions of working Americans, and the left should look to policy makers, not judges, to address economic inequalities. Over-reliance on the courts, Obama said, is a mistake..

The spin machine seems especially hung up on Obama’s use of the word “tragedy,” but as Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton noted, “In the interview, Obama went into extensive detail to explain why the courts should not get into that business of ‘redistributing’ wealth. Obama’s point — and what he called a tragedy — was that legal victories in the Civil Rights led too many people to rely on the courts to change society for the better. That view is shared by conservative judges and legal scholars across the country.”

What you are seeing is a very clever, yet blatantly dishonest hack job on the piece where Barack Obama was participating in a radio discussion on civil rights, the judiciary, and economics.

I hope this helps you Ashley, because I can understand why you would be alarmed by what the McCain handlers are telling you.

You should be alarmed by their willingness to be misleading.

You don’t really know how to work this “debate” thing, do you?
That is really an excellent point coming from the one who defends his positions with personal attacks.

You seemed to have glossed over this part of my original comment,
Responding to a question from a girl who wants to know why her her father, a doctor, pays a higher tax rate than people who earn less:

McCain: “I think it’s to some degree because we feel, obviously, that wealthy people can afford more.”

Doctor’s daughter: Aren’t we getting closer and closer to, like, socialism and stuff?

McCain: “Here’s what I really believe. When you are, reach a certain level of comfort, there is nothing wrong with paying somewhat more.”

You have not given one reason to refute the fact that Gov. Palin heads the most socialist state in the country. Other than name calling and espousing that it isn’t so! Reading Mccains quote above, its now all coming together, I see clearly why he chose the running mate he did, unfortunately I dont agree with their socialist views, but if you do I feel you are entitled to your opinions.

And one last thing in one of your above comments you state “Jefferson was speaking out against the excesses of monarchy and an entrenched hereditary nobility.” But I fail to see one mention of either in the quote, I do however see banks and corporations spoken of. Your position must be that banks and corporations equal monarchy and nobility.
We have no difference in viewpoints there.
I am glad you agree with my points.

Yes, according to history. Thomas Jefferson was a great president of the US. Alexander Hamilton was a great banker. Our federal reserve system is very much to blame for our current predicament. Jefferson foresaw the problems that unregulated banks and corporations posed to our society. Unfortunately to undo the damage that has been done by these institutions, we will now have to radically change our ways or risk going further down the toilet.
The corporate culture in America is out of control with the sub-prime mortgage mess that should not have ever happpened if these “Banks and Brokerage houses” ran there companies with some sense of national responsibility. The bankers and stockbrokers who sold these sub-prime mortgages are getting huge bonuses and at the same time they are destroying the American economy. The same thing goes for the commidities market with oil prices and where they speculate the price of oil higher everyday which is destroying the economy and giving us higher inflation. Therefore, look at the former CEO of Merril Lynch where he destroyed the stock of the company by investing in these sub-prime mortgages. He was ousted as CEO and he received a parachute deal worth over 100 million dollars. This clown should be put in jail for destroying peoples lives. The financial mistakes that these corporations make in America affect peoples lives and ther jobs and they should be held accountable for there risky actions. The Corporations in America have no sense of National responsibility because, the only thing they care about is the bottom line.
How you can defend this behavior is beyond me, and truthfully I would like it to stay that way.

Everyone believe is “sharing the wealth” as you narrowly understand the term. Trickle down economics is “sharing the wealth”.

Your ignorance makes you incoherent here, H. In the free enterprise system, we have “earning the wealth”. The term “trickle down” economics is a falsehood. A rising tide lifts all boats. You get what you earn, not what a greedy govt confiscates from the achievers and uses as a vote buying scheme to consolidate their political power. Obama’s “sharing the wealth”(whether you choose to or not) is on the path to totalitarianism.

Obama’s “sharing the wealth” has nothing to do with “civil rights”, unless you think taking money from others is a “right”. As a commie, you probably do, but real Americans want to keep what they earn.
Obama uses the slavery card to justify his black separatism/Marxism. You fell for it; most of us are smarter than that.

My my my… Seems to me that MccainandPalinaresocialists? sounds like PiaB. Could it be that someone’s shilling around?

Let Obama set an example by spreading his wealth around.

Exactly. Instead of forcing people to give, let people decide what they want to give and who they want to give it to. Each year I budget a certain amount for donations, whether it be charitable donations that I decide to make or and socialized donations (taxes) that I’m forced to make. I zero this budget out every year. If taxes steal more, then I have less to give to charitable donations.

Trickle down economics doesn’t work?

Just doesn’t ring true coming a spokesman for a campaign that has raised over $600 MILLION for this election.

Any reasonable person would that for what it is. A lie.

Obama is a Marxist. Those who are voting for him are Marxists or supporters of Marxism.

As for Alexander Hamilton, I think its ironic that you would desire a quote from someone who wasn’t born an American citizen.

You don’t really know how to work this “debate” thing, do you?
Your irrelevant comments are laughable, and have nothing to do with your original erroneous statement.

What Obama was talking about was the victories, challenges and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court.

Bullshit! He said the same thing to Joe the Plumber. Nice try. He believes “sharing the wealth” is “good for everyone”. That’s pure Marxism. Marx believed that equality of outcome was the key to happiness(except for the ruling elite, of course). Even he recognized that concept was so unnatural that it required “the dictatorship of the proletariat” for an undefined period of time.

Anybody notice that Fox gave this lying crapweasel airtime, while the Obama campaign is censoring Barbara West?

You cherry-pick a quote from the early 19th Century, and fail to deal with the word for word recitation of Marx that Obama has made several times. Par for the course for you lying lefties.
Alaska’s oil fund has been around for generations, and you lie when you ascribe it to Sarah. Oil companies are free to drill in other States if they don’t like the deal, but you lie about “socialism”, as if that somehow justifies Obama’s obvious Marxism. Shame on you!
Why don’t you try cherry-picking something from Alexander Hamilton? Doesn’t fit in with your lying agenda?

Bill Burton is good, but he’s not good enough. He’s a slimy little douchebag who never did answer the question. If this bunch gets elected, say hello to George Orwell’s nightmare.

Handing out $500 to the 45% who don’t pay taxes isn’t going to change their lives or stimulate them into becoming more productive members of society. They will simply spend the money. It will have a short term impact on the economy. It’s nothing more than a welfare handout.

Wall street is running scared right now. Business and investors do not want Obama in office. If you think the economy is poor now just wait. It will be far worse under Barack “Jimmy Carter” Obama. The smart people can see it coming.

That is exactly right. That is exactly what I saw from Meagan, anger, threats and intimidation.

Seriously? Where exactly? What you saw from Meagan was not allowing the guy to do an end-around on the line of questioning. It’s a very common tactic to try to take a question and NOT answer it by redirecting the conversation. Meagan was simply not allowing him to do that.

He never did actually answer the question, by the way. He spent all of his time attacking Fox News and Megan personally, and started trying to take control of the conversation by not allowing Megan to speak. All Meagan did is refuse to allow that.

Yes, Robert. Ignoring the truth does make it so. Keep whistling in the dark.
I suppose this is also another “Leftie lie”

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”–Thomas Jefferson–The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)

Meagan chose to make the issue about his remarks about Fox News. He was simply answering the questions she asked about his charges.

It was her first question to him. It was her first remarks to him.

Then she said he felt bad, and he had to correct her.

It was true that Fox lead with the story and reported on McCain’s response, before he actually responded. She didn’t talk about those time frames.

Then she accused him of blaming Fox, the best defense is a good offense. She kept going to it. She hardly pushed on answers to the issue.

Then she talked about statistics about McCains bitter campaign tactics and how the media reflects them.

Then she wouldn’t let him promote the Obama’s infomercial coming out.

Then she went back to the statistics about fairness in the MSM.

Then finally she asked him to answer the question….and he did.

He said giving a tax cut to 90% of Americans is not socialism and that Fox news

SHE SAID SHE DOESNT APPRECIATE THE SARCASM AND TOLD HIM SO SAVE IT FOR HIS FRIENDS AT THE OTHER NEWS CHANNELS. And she kept screaming and raising her voice through the entire interview.

The Obama spokesman was calm, cool and collect.