Media’s Coverage Of Obama Is Even-Handed While Coverage Of McCain Is Overwhelmingly Negativ

  •  October 23, 2008

I’m shocked.

image

I instant messaged this story to a liberal friend of mine before posting it, and my liberal friend’s response was “Well of course McCain get’s more negative coverage. McCain sucks.”
I think that’s probably the media’s attitude about this too, in a nutshell.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array Jerry

    The Media, Bias???
    Nooooooo……

    If McCain and Republicans had caused the current financial crisis, it would be a Major, Friggin’ SCANDAL!!!!
    Top of the news every night!!

    But it wasn’t. It was the Democrats. Propping up Fannie May and Freddie Mac to the last moment. Getting Campaign contributions. Denying the Bush administration any deeper regulation when asked for.
    2nd Biggest recipiant of contributions? Guess who??
    Guess Who? Guess Who? Guess Who?….

    If you said Obama, you win..

    Where’s the Journalists? What,..uh..where…uh..
    no scandal here…

    Oh.. Lets just hand over our country to These guys here on the Left.

  • Hungry Bear

    It’s interesting that the media gave McCain far more positive coverage than any of the other Republicans…until he got the nomination.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    I instant messaged this story to a liberal friend of mine before posting it, and my liberal friend’s response was “Well of course McCain get’s more negative coverage. McCain sucks.”

    Yet the automatic assumption is that this is fair. But Barack is unfairly lampooned on Fox.

  • David

    It’s interesting that the media gave McCain far more positive coverage than any of the other Republicans…until he got the nomination.

    RINO McCain is the red headed stepchild now
    I think the MSM is just not wanting to be seen as biased

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus