Media Preparing Themselves To Call The Race Early For Obama On Election Night
Sure. Why not.
What’s the worst that could happen? No reason to let everyone, or even most Americans, actually vote before you announce a winner.
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – U.S. television news teams that sent election-night viewers to bed without a sure winner in the last two presidential races now face what many political pundits expect to be a swifter outcome next Tuesday.
With Barack Obama consistently leading pre-election opinion polls, network news executives are ready for the possibility that the Democratic nominee could emerge early in the evening clearly headed for victory over Republican rival John McCain.
Didn’t we have a big problem with the media announcing a winner too early during the 2000 election? Isn’t it a little unfair for people living in the west for the media to declare winner before they’ve had a chance to vote? And given all the turmoil that surrounds voting every year, is rushing the matter something we really want to do?
I really don’t see why there’s such a rush to declare a winner. Let people vote. Count those votes. Then declare the guy with the most votes the winner.
This really isn’t rocket science. I understand that everyone in the media wants to be the first to call the election, but what’s more important? Television news ratings, or fair elections?



