Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

McCain Wanted Victory; Obama Wanted Anything But

Yesterday in Rochester, New Hampshire, McCain said:

This is a clear choice that the American people have. I had the courage and the judgment to say I would rather lose a political campaign than lose a war. It seems to me that Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign.

It seems that way? Any honest appraisal demands it. Obama's profusion of views on Iraq are dizzying, but they have always had one unifying theme: victory is not an option. Obama opposed The Surge, he opposed troop funding, and he (initially) proposed a hard 16-month timeline for abandoning Iraq regardless of the facts on the ground there and regardless of what the generals recommend (even if genocide raged. No hope or change for you, Iraq). Obama's only sacred principle is that he wants to be president, and the only way this overweening ambition could be satisfied was to run to the left of Hillary Clinton in order to win the Democratic primaries. Thus his purely political Iraq 'strategy' was born.

So John McCain can be forgiven, and even congratulated, for pointing out that Obama's views have nothing to do with Iraq, and everything to do with Obama's presidential ambitions.

John McCain on the other hand very courageously proposed troop increases in Iraq at a time when abandoning Iraq to the wolves was seen as conventionally wise, and even desirable. McCain truly did risk all of his presidential ambitions on a single long shot, and had The Surge failed he would of course not be within striking distance of winning the presidency. To John McCain however, victory was more important than John McCain. That is quite refreshing.

Joe Klein reacted by fomenting a lot of faux outrage over McCain's statement, knowing that this uppercut to Obama's solar plexus may well be McCain's best soundbite of the campaign:

This is the ninth presidential campaign I've covered. I can't remember a more scurrilous statement by a major party candidate. It smacks of desperation. It renews questions about whether McCain has the right temperament for the presidency. How sad.

I wish the left could, just once, generate this type of ire for lightweight candidates who want to destroy America's military morale and ability to follow through on critical foreign policy projects.

Crossposted from Ken McCracken

Comments

It looks like McCain might be willing to fight for America, after all.  Good for him.


Hope and change, in a free world, are the private possessions of motivated individuals.

robert108 on July 23, 2008 at 10:11 am

Notice how Klein inserts

temperment

into his absurd comment, thus trying to score a double-hit.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

“Glory is not a conceit. It is not a decoration for valor. Glory belongs to the act of being constant to something greater than yourself, to a cause, to your principles, to the people on whom you rely, and who rely on you in return.”
Senator John McCain, Faith of Our fathers

pparets on July 23, 2008 at 10:24 am

Way to go McCain!

Zsa Zsa on July 23, 2008 at 10:55 am

Lose the war?  If it only was that.  Obama wants to bring our entire nation to its collective knees facing Mecca 4 times each day.


You don’t have to be a moron to be a liberal Democrat but it sure helps.

docdave on July 23, 2008 at 11:28 am

Actually, the truth with Obama is that he voted FOR the troops before he voted against it. Initially, Barack Obama voted for more funds and against timetables, then turned 180 degrees to become the anti-war candidate he is today.


Obama/Biden is not change. It’s more of the same.

Kenny on July 23, 2008 at 12:05 pm

Kenny,

Actually, the truth with Obama is that there is no reason to believe anything the man says.  Other than his name and his family, there simply isn’t much he has said in the past that hasn’t been subject to refining, revision, and reevaluation.  He is an opportunist and a panderer with no discernible core beliefs or priniciples that he himself hasn’t called into question


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on July 23, 2008 at 01:07 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.