McCain: The Answer To Rising Health Care Costs Is Wal-Mart

He’ll be mocked for this by the left/media (same thing) but he’s not wrong:


Think about this for a moment: What’s the biggest problem with American health care? It’s not the quality (we’ve got the best doctors and hospitals in the world), it’s the cost. So why does it cost so much? Because pretty much every transaction in the health care industry involves three parties: The care provider, the patient and whoever is paying for the patient’s care. And for the vast majority of us, that’s either a government program or an employer-backed plan.
We go to pretty much whatever doctor or hospital we want without heed for the cost because, let’s face it, we’re not paying for it. At least not directly.
That doctor or hospital charges us pretty much any exorbitant fee they want because, again, we’re not paying for it directly.
The insurance company gets stuck with the big fees and their only options are to just pay it or to try and dispute the charges with the hospital. Which usually leads to costly legal battles that make such challenges not very cost effective. So the insurance companies pony up and try to manage costs by either limiting our access to care (dictating which doctors we can see and which procedures are covered) or jacking up premiums.
Imagine if we paid for our health care directly. Hospitals and doctors wouldn’t be able to jack up fees because we’d be paying for it, and there’d be little point to do that anyway since individually we don’t have the deep pockets of insurance companies and said hospitals/doctors aren’t about to price themselves out of the market.
Plus, if we got billed too much (or got poor service, etc.) we could just take our money and go to whatever doctor or hospital or clinic we wanted. Which is something that doesn’t happen much now. Most localities are served by just a handful of hospitals and clinics that just about everyone goes to, and we all go to them because, again, we don’t have a lot of incentive to shop around for health care because our insurance is picking up the tab.
But if we did pay for own health care directly and we did shop around for care our health care system would not only be more affordable we’d also have more care and treatment choices available to us as doctors and hospitals and clinics popped up to compete for our suddenly more discerning business.
And maybe, just maybe, one of the entities that would get into that competition would be Wal-Mart. Would that be such a bad thing? Wal-Mart already has a solid reputation for providing Americans with the goods and services they want at reasonable prices (look at all the people who shop there).
I’m pretty sure I could get better quality care at a Wal-Mart clinic than I could at the hospital I go to now.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://Array Palinisabimbo

    A man who does not know how many homes he owns obviously has never been inside a modern store. Or, been to one, but forgot. John, wake up and smell the Metamucil, we ALREADY have those kinds of walk-in clinics in MidWest. And guess what, they have NOT SOLVED the heath care crisis. And your $5000 per family allowance won’t be and isn’t now enough for even WalMart type health care.

    Guess Rob must be with me on this one, since there he is complaining about his, presumably non-government run clinic.

    John, it’s the 21st century outside! For heaven’s sakes, can’t your campaign afford a decent fact checker?

    Good night and have a pleasant tomorrow.
    Rob, thanks for posting this. I would LOL, were my heart not so heavy.

  • HG

    This is the right idea. Wal-Mart could do a more efficient job of handling the majority of emergency room visits with a simple walk-in clinic and at a far lower cost. Wal-mart gave us $4 prescriptions that even government subsidized programs can’t match.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Publix and a few other stores already offer about ten of the most commonly prescribed drugs FOR FREE! I know, I got some the last time I had a prescription filled. The root cause of this “drug problem” is simply people engaging in risky sexual behaviors and not taking care of their physical fitness. In addition, many of the cry babies use drugs and can not manage their finances.

    One prime example: When I taught in the public schools, the “instruction fee” for the ENTIRE YEAR was $6.00. About half of the families did not pay it, but their children had plenty of money for the “snack machines”, $100 sneakers and $150 “dos”. It is simply priorities and examples for your children. What is more important? A 6-pack of beer or providing for your own children’s education? They voted with their wallets. Their children saw what they did and copied their behaviors. More drug addicts. More irresponsible people, more “health care crisis” at the emergency room, more overdoses of drugs, more costs to the taxpayers living an honest, clean life. (Is that sentence too “run-on”)?

  • http://www.fargophantom.com/ Fargo News Media

    Does anyone else think that no one really knows what is going on?

  • ollie-B

    Wal-Mart already has a solid reputation for providing Americans with the goods and services they want at reasonable prices (look at all the people who shop there).

    Give me a break. Wal-Mart gives us goods and services at the cheapest prices possible. But quality is another thing. With all the problems we have been having with products imported from China by Wal-Mart, I don’t think shopping there is such a great deal.

  • Ken

    I agree with what you say to an extent. But even with the reforms you speak of, hospital costs, while they’d be lower, would still likely remain enormous. Most people don’t realize the amount of overhead involved in just a short hospital stay. Hospitals would have to cut a lot of programs just to remain competitive. With the system you propose, you can kiss a lot of medical research goodbye. And I suspect the number of teaching hospitals would drop dramatically as well, thereby decreasing the supply. And even if hospitals could get their costs to a point where the average American could afford to pay for their entire health care costs out of pocket, the quality of healthcare would drop dramatically.

    There are a lot more factors that drive up the cost of healthcare other than our third party payment system. I’m not saying you’re stance is wrong, just that there are sacrifices involved that must be realistically addressed. One alternative that I think should be explored is having people pay for minor medical costs out of pocket and then have insurance policies to cover major events.

  • Bat One

    Allison,

    The real key to any meaningful reform of our healthcare system is for the economically productive citizens to refuse, adamantly, to assume responsibility for those others who refuse to take care of themselves while expecting the rest of us to shoulder the burden of their lazy incompetence.

    Our government, meaning we the taxpayers, cannot afford the open-ended commitments we have already foolishly assumed (Social Security, Medicare, PBGC, etc.). We cannot continue to increase the size and number of unfunded liabilities while reducing the number of people who pay into the system and diminishing the growth of tax revenues and the growth potential of the economy by raising tax rates and increasing government regulation over our economy.

  • Allison

    I think your post illustrates why health care reform is so key in this election. John McCain recently responded to a set of questions about health issued by Your Candidates-Your Health. You can see his plan for health care, and compare it to Obama’s, at Your Candidates-Your Health

  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin

    Economies of scale for health care? We can’t have any of that nonsense, especially in North Dakota, which outlaws them for agriculture and education!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Give me a break. Wal-Mart gives us goods and services at the cheapest prices possible. But quality is another thing.

    If the quality is insufficient, why do so many people buy them? If the care in Wal-Mart’s clinics was insufficient, do you really think people would go there? Especially in a system where they’d be afforded more choice?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    A man who does not know how many homes he owns obviously has never been inside a modern store. Or, been to one, but forgot. John, wake up and smell the Metamucil, we ALREADY have those kinds of walk-in clinics in MidWest. And guess what, they have NOT SOLVED the heath care crisis. And your $5000 per family allowance won’t be and isn’t now enough for even WalMart type health care.

    We have walk-in clinics, sure, but what we lack is the impetus to engage in the sort of market-decision making we do with every other kind of purchase in our life.

    That’s going to take legislative reform.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development