Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, March 26, 2008


“McCain Rejects Broad U.S. Aid on Mortgages”

Yesterday, Rob offered a post (below) on James Petothoukis’ suggestion that GOP candidate John McCain will endorse a “bailout” of borrowers and lenders in dealing with the so-called “mortgage crisis.”

Apparently, both Democrat candidates, and the Democrats’ premier media mouthpiece, the New York Times, interpret Mr. McCain’s remarks quite differently.
 

SANTA ANA, Calif. — Drawing a sharp distinction between himself and the two Democratic presidential candidates, Senator John McCain of Arizona warned Tuesday against vigorous government action to solve the deepening mortgage crisis and the market turmoil it has caused, saying that “it is not the duty of government to bail out and reward those who act irresponsibly, whether they are big banks or small borrowers.”

Mr. McCain’s comments came a day after Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York called for direct federal intervention to help affected homeowners, including a $30 billion fund for states and communities to assist those at risk of foreclosure. Mrs. Clinton’s Democratic opponent, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois, has similarly called for greater federal involvement, including creation of a $10 billion relief package to prevent foreclosures.

As the foreclosure crisis has rippled across the economy, it has thrust itself to the forefront of the presidential race, with Democrats seizing on the issue in urging forceful government steps to alleviate the crisis. Mr. McCain’s remarks Tuesday, to a group of Hispanic businessmen here, signaled a sharpening divide between the two parties’ candidates, with the senator warning against quick, costly government fixes to a crises rooted in the private sector…

“Rampant speculation” on both sides is the root cause of the crisis, Mr. McCain said. He placed part of the responsibility for the mortgage mess on lenders, who he said had grown “complacent” in a rising market and as a result acquired a “false sense of security” that caused them to “lower their lending standards.”

But in a departure from Democrats, who have focused on the lending industry’s role in the crisis, Mr. McCain suggested that some homeowners had also engaged in dangerous practices, including borrowing too much in hopes that a rising market would cover their mortgages.

Mr. McCain has often addressed the mortgage crisis in general terms on the campaign trail, but in Tuesday’s remarks he offered a more comprehensive look at the challenge facing the nation — and the roots of the problem. He blamed a profusion of complicated and recently devised financial instruments “that weren’t particularly well understood by even the most sophisticated banks, lenders and hedge funds.”

Mr. McCain appeared to be trying to confront questions about his dexterity in dealing with the economy, a subject that he has admitted is not his strongest suit. But his remarks drew a quick, pointed rebuke from Mrs. Clinton, who criticized Mr. McCain’s hands-off, market-oriented approach, saying it would lead to “a downward spiral that would cause tremendous economic pain and loss” for Americans…

“It sounds remarkably like Herbert Hoover, and I don’t think that’s good economic policy,” Mrs. Clinton told reporters…

Mr. Obama’s plan emphasizes making it easier to convert subprime loans to fixed-rate, 30-year loans, while requiring that borrowers have access to better data on loan costs and requiring greater scrutiny of lenders. On Tuesday, he said, “It’s deeply troubling that John McCain is suggesting that the best way to address the housing crisis is to sit back and watch it happen.”

Personally, I have great regard for “Jimmie P” and both his knowledge of financial markets and his insight.  But the fact is, that though there will continue to be substantial write-downs of mortgage-backed securities and continuing foreclosures as the residential real estate market readjusts to lower valuations in certain, select markets, the worst of the “crisis” is probably behind us already, and almost certainly will be by the time a new President takes office next January.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

His speech today demostrated that the liberal McCain is very much alive and kicking in his dark liberal soul. He is better than the Hildbeast and Osamabama, but not by much!


In keeping silent about evil, in burying it deep within us, so that it appears nowhere on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousandfold in the future.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn. The Gulag Archipelago

Neiman on March 26, 2008 at 11:09 am

His speech today demostrated that the liberal McCain is very much alive and kicking in his dark liberal soul.

Neiman,

Your argument would be at least modestly believable, if not compelling, if you provided some basic description of the speech you’re referring to and link for the rest of us to judge for ourselves the accuracy of your assessment of it.

If you’re referring to Mr. McCain’s remarks quoted in my post and Rob’s, those were offered two days ago at a roundtable discussion for Hispanic small business owners… a fact covered by the articles cited in both posts.


“Capitalism is optimism monetized.”

Bat One on March 26, 2008 at 11:46 am

Because I say it is true, that means it is true beyond all question or shadow of a doubt! But, just in case you refuse to subscribe to that and deny my omniscience:

http://www.comcast.net/news/articles/general/2007/12/22/NEWS-USA-POLITICS-DC/

“model citizen of the global community” (I despise the global community crap, our POTUS should be first and foremost an American and only part of the global community as it is in our defense and economic interests)

“We need to respect the collective will of our allies.” (Like France and Germany?)

“We can’t torture of behave inhumanely towards suspected terrorists we have captured.” (When did we torture anyone or behave inhumanely as a matter of policy, approved by the President?)

“Distancing himself from the unilateral diplomatic approach of Presidet Bush.” (He still hates Bush for defeating him in 2000 and our self-righteous candidate will do anything the make himself appear right and Bush to be a fool, like his constant carping about the surge was his idea.)

While he remains strong in words about the war in Iraq and against Islamic terrorism, his general tone and tenor reflects his liberal tendencies, in my opinion, and his so-called independent streak gets damn irritating!


In keeping silent about evil, in burying it deep within us, so that it appears nowhere on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousandfold in the future.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn. The Gulag Archipelago

Neiman on March 26, 2008 at 12:00 pm

Mac makes excuses:

complicated and recently devised financial instruments “that weren’t particularly well understood by even the most sophisticated banks, lenders and hedge funds.

He thinks the financial institutions are as clueless as he is.

WOOF on March 26, 2008 at 12:03 pm

WOOF,

A slam from you toward anything or anyone Republican is to be expected, but McCain’s candor about the complexity of the derivatives market is probably a welcome change for many people to the ignorant prattle of those on the Left whose answer to everything is to throw more taxpayers’ money at it.

By the way, I wonder just how knowledgeable YOU really are about all this.  Is there any reason to think you are in any way qualified to disparage McCain’s knowledge of economic matters?  I doubt it.


“Capitalism is optimism monetized.”

Bat One on March 26, 2008 at 12:31 pm

BatOne:  Great post! But you are whistling in the wind if you think some folks here can be brought to see any virtue in a McCain presidency.

If the man sneezed, they would rush to SAB and say, “See! I told you he was a snot!”


“Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other vews.

William F. Buckley Jr.

pparets on March 26, 2008 at 12:40 pm

Bat One:

By the way, I wonder just how knowledgeable YOU really are about all this.

You needn’t wonder.  WOOF is completely clueless and this is just his usual sh*t talk.

Carrick on March 26, 2008 at 01:21 pm

If the man sneezed, they would rush to SAB and say, “See! I told you he was a snot!”

Why hasn’t this been brought up before? smile

On a serious note this story contradicts Rob’s post about McCain’s position on the matter, and in fact brings it closer to mine. 

I see he’s getting less dumb.


1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.
5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.
10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on March 26, 2008 at 01:35 pm

pparets,

Even if the only “value” of a McCain presidency came down to what he would NOT do… what he would NOT do in Iraq; what he would NOT do with regards to Iran, Pakistan, and our ongoing conflict with radical Islam; what he would NOT do regarding the US economy and our current level of taxation and federal spending; and who he would NOT nominate to the federal judiciary and the US Supreme Court… it seems to me that the value of all that he would NOT do is well worth supporting.

Especially when yo consider the alternatives!


“Capitalism is optimism monetized.”

Bat One on March 26, 2008 at 01:40 pm

On a serious note this story contradicts Rob’s post about McCain’s position on the matter, and in fact brings it closer to mine.

Whistler,

The difference is one of inference.  “Jimmy P” like a lot of others here at SAB is quite nearly fanatical in his belief in free market capitalism, and is understandably skeptical of McCain’s economic positions.  The NYT, in contrast, will castigate anyone who suggests that the answer to any problem, real of imagined, isn’t higher taxes and more federal spending.

I’d suggest that the folks at the Times are probably contemplating a taxpayer subsidy to bolster their sagging stock price… but the fact of the matter is, they’ve already had just such a subsidy and it didn’t help one bit.


“Capitalism is optimism monetized.”

Bat One on March 26, 2008 at 02:03 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.