Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, July 07, 2008


McCain Plans To Balance National Budget With Cuts In Entitlement Spending

McCain isn’t being real specific about his plans just yet, but this at least sounds hopeful:

Right now, based on what McCain and the campaign have said, McCain proposes more than $650 billion a year in tax cuts, which is equivalent to a third of domestic spending, and is offset by, first, $160 billion in unspecified domestic cuts. (Note: the McCain campaign disputes the premise that some of the tax cuts, like altering the way companies deduct expenses, would cost anything in the long-run so they don’t provide off-sets for it.) The rest would come from economic growth after some sort of rapid sequence intubation of fresh optimism into the economy and large-scale reform of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. On a conference call today, McCain adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin hinted that the onus would be on Democrats to cooperate with McCain on entitlement reform, implying that if they don’t, the Democratic Congress would be to blame for the deficit, not McCain.

There isn’t going to be a solution to this nation’s budget woes until some leader stands up and takes meaningful action to actually reduce entitlement spending on programs like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.  And by “reduce” I mean actually cutting spending, not just reducing the rate of growth in spending.

So a move would be a painful one to make in modern politics given that those individuals and groups who have a vested interest in keeping those entitlements growing as they are would put up a mighty fit, but it needs to be done regardless.

Whether or not McCain is that sort of a leader remains to be seen, but campaigning on this issue could be one way for the man to win his way back into the hears and minds of conservatives.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Avatar for Craig Eddy

I am sick and tired of the Democrats blaming the Iraq war for our economic woes. The fact of the matter is the U.S. government incurs a deficit of over $3 TRILLION EACH YEAR paying for these programs (see http://www.usatoday.com/money/2006-08-02-deficit-usat_x.htm)

Craig Eddy on July 7, 2008 at 12:08 pm

Your right. I propose that anyone making over 250,000
a year should forgo there social security benefits. That should help a lot.


You’re here because you know something. What you know, you can’t explain. But you feel it. You felt it your entire life. That there’s something wrong with the world. You don’t know what it is, but it’s there. Like a splinter in your mind—driving you mad.

Buzz on July 7, 2008 at 07:40 pm

Your [sic] right. I propose that anyone making over 250,000 a year should forgo there [sic] social security benefits.

An inordinately stupid, and ultimately self-defeating proposal.  Even for a liberal.

After all, you can’t really claim it’s an entitlement program if the people who paid into it are no longer “entitled” to the benefits.  Besides, once your $250,000 limit is enacted (please note the dollar sign!), the Left’s whole specious argument about Republicans trying to take Social Security away from those who’ve earned it goes right down the rhetorical drain.

Of course, in fairness, Obama’s “plan” to “save Social Security does no such thing.  But that’s hardly a problem for conservatives.


“Capitalism is optimism monetized.”

Bat One on July 7, 2008 at 08:07 pm

Buzz - Your right. I propose that anyone making over 250,000 a year should forgo there social security benefits.

Then what are they paying into it for? The good of the country?

The government (and you) should just butt out. Can you handle minding your own business?

Sorry for getting so personal, but you’re the one who is sticking his nose into other people’s paychecks. The fact of the matter is, you made it personal.

likwidshoe on July 7, 2008 at 09:13 pm
Avatar for Brainmaggot

To allow our leader to continue unchecked is pure folly they have dug us a grave so deep with debt that our children’s children’s children will not be able to pay it back. There is i fear only one way to show washington who’s country they live in and who indeed they answer to. stand up for yourselves look around you is this what this country was founded on, i say know we do not have freedom of religion we have freedom from religion. free speech is going next along with the second amendment. ladies and gentlemen our leaders have created the problems we are currently struggling with and the dear esteemed speaker of the house nancy dear nancy has told you to eat cake. question is how do we respond ladies and gentlemen they have power only as long as we allow them to.

Brainmaggot on July 8, 2008 at 02:29 am

To allow our leader to continue unchecked is pure folly they have dug us a grave so deep with debt…

Don’t kid yourself. We live in a nation that wants big government. We live in a nation that calls the limiting of entitlement growth as a “cut”, for which we can thank the “progressives” for burdening this country with that mindset.

America has the government it deserves.

likwidshoe on July 8, 2008 at 05:09 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.