Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, June 14, 2006


Lieberman Needs To Go GOP

Hmm...

HARTFORD, Conn. - Democratic Sen. Joe Lieberman, warily watching his primary challenger advance in the polls, must soon decide whether to start collecting signatures for a possible independent bid this November.

Lieberman's campaign contends that it's focused only on winning the Aug. 8 primary, but the Democrat has not ruled out petitioning his way onto the November ballot as part of a backup plan to secure a fourth term in the Senate.

"I am not going to close out any options," the senator recently told reporters.

Lieberman has until Aug. 9 — the day after the Democratic primary — to collect 7,500 signatures from registered voters to gain a spot on the ballot as an unaffiliated candidate.

But any effort to gather signatures before the primary would be a sign of weakness, indicating that Lieberman, the Democratic vice presidential nominee in 2000, fears that he could lose to businessman Ned Lamont. The effort also would rile Democrats who already question Lieberman's party loyalty and his perceived closeness to President Bush.


I believe Joe Lieberman would be better off running as a Republican. Here's why (from the same article):

According to a recent Quinnipiac University Poll, 57 percent of registered Democrats in Connecticut said they would vote for Lieberman, compared to 32 percent for Lamont. A month ago, Lieberman drew 65 percent to Lamont's 19 percent.

The poll found that if Lieberman runs as an independent, he would win with 56 percent of the vote, compared to 18 percent for Lamont and 8 percent for Republican Alan Schlesinger. Lieberman enjoys higher ratings among Republicans and unaffiliated voters than Democrats, the poll found. Unaffiliated voters are the state's largest bloc of voters, followed by Democrats and then Republicans.


Clearly, if Lieberman is on the ballot (either as an independent, Republican or a Democrat) he's favored to win even with Lamont's growing polling numbers. It behooves both Lieberman and Republicans to see Lamont - who represents everything that is wrong with today's Democrat party and their shift to the far left - defeated. Remember that Lamont is backed by far-left, uber-blogger Markos Zuniga. If Lieberman turns Republican and defeats Lamont it may just be enough to jolt the national Democrat party back toward the middle. Maybe they'll finally see Markos Zuniga and his ilk don't represent the views of the majority of Americans.

Or maybe not, but it's worth a shot for both Lieberman and Republicans. Lieberman would get a chance to knock his own party back toward the middle and Republicans get to know that they've made inroads into creating an opposition party that is more moderate and (more than likely) easier to work with.

I hope this happens, for the nation's sake.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Avatar for Chad Evans

“I believe Joe Lieberman would be better off running as a Republican.”

Interesting concept, but would Lieberman receive the votes from Republican voters against a Republican candidate?  I like Lieberman and have always liked him and I would probably vote for him depending on who his other challenger is, but I am not a Republican. 

In order for Lieberman to win as an Indpendent, he would have to secure more votes than both parties and I don’t think there are more votes in the independent bracket than either the Republican or Democratic brackets.  It would go down to how many Republicans and Democrats jumped ship to vote for Lieberman.  He may not have any other choice, but running as an Independent has to rank much higher on his list of options than running as a Republican.

Chad Evans on June 14, 2006 at 12:32 pm
Avatar for Bat One

Lieberman, who was once known as the “conscience of the Senate” was forced to compromise some very long-held beliefs and principles to run against Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney in 2000 on the Democrat ticket with AlGore.

How ironic if he switches parties, runs as a Republican, and is endorsed by the Administration he ran against.

Lieberman is too honorable a man to be affiliated with the party of Gore, Kerry, and Howard Dean.  There is plenty of room for a man with Joe Lieberman’s integrity in the GOP.  While the Dems apparently don’t want him or his integrity.

Bat One on June 14, 2006 at 12:46 pm

We’re still talking about 15-20% gap between Lieberman and Lamont, depending on the poll you look at.  Still a an extremely long shot for Lamont.  (No doubt, DailyKos will crow about their “power”, if Lamont “only” loses by 10%).

The interesting question is what would happen if Lieberman were defeated in the primary and Lamont were to run against Streitz (the RNC nominee)?  It would be hilarious if the Democrats shoot themselves in the foot, and replace a shoo-in for reelection candidate with an unelectable wingnut.

Carrick on June 14, 2006 at 12:51 pm
Avatar for The Whistler

I’m not going to get to drippy to elect the guy.  He’s got a lifetime 17 rating from the American Conservative Union.  That puts him more liberal than Kent Conrad or Byron Dorgan.

The Whistler on June 14, 2006 at 12:57 pm
Avatar for WOOF

Lamont could be better off with Lieberman running as
an independent.
Better to run against two repubs than one.

WOOF on June 14, 2006 at 12:58 pm

WOOF:

Lamont could be better off with Lieberman running as an independent.

That’s not what the polls suggest.

Joe Lieberman (I) 47%
Ned Lamont (D) 20%
Paul Streitz (R) 17%

In any case, with this movement to unseat Lieberman, the radicals in the DNC are effectively saying that moderate Democrats are no longer welcome in their party.

They don’t example have an overwhelming majority in this country right now.  So this really doesn’t strike me as particularly bright.

Carrick on June 14, 2006 at 01:03 pm
Avatar for Bat One

“Now it’s our party: we bought it, we own it, and we’re going to take it back.”

Eli Pariser of MoveOn PAC, in an email after John Kerry’s loss in 2004.

Bat One on June 14, 2006 at 01:27 pm
Avatar for The Whistler

The hope of the GOP is that the lefties keep up the pressure inside the Demoncrat party.

The Whistler on June 14, 2006 at 01:29 pm

Lieberman isn’t even that much of a moderate - he just happens to be for the War On Terror (including Iraq) which alone makes him anathema in the Democratic Party.

If Che Guevara were for the war, the Dems would ostracize him, too.

Ken McCracken on June 14, 2006 at 01:33 pm
Avatar for The Whistler

He seems like a good guy for a liberal, but still a liberal.

The Whistler on June 14, 2006 at 01:34 pm
Rob
Rob
22123 comments
Send a private message

I’m not going to get to drippy to elect the guy. He’s got a lifetime 17 rating from the American Conservative Union. That puts him more liberal than Kent Conrad or Byron Dorgan.

Yeah, but we’ve got to remember which part of the country we’re talking about.  Lieberman is about as conservative as you’re going to get and still be electable in Connecticut.


The purpose of government shouldn’t be to do good, but simply to refrain from doing evil.

Rob on June 14, 2006 at 01:35 pm
Avatar for The Whistler

Lieberman is about as conservative as you’re going to get and still be electable in Connecticut.

Agreed!

The Whistler on June 14, 2006 at 01:37 pm
Avatar for WOOF

Large 7% MOE in this poll, but realize Lieb is a 3 term Senator and not used to having serious opposition.

In Connecticut, Lamont Closes the Gap
Want to know why supporters of Sen. Joe Lieberman are planning an independent bid? A new Rasmussen Reports poll shows Lieberman leading primary challenger Ned Lamont (D) by just six percentage points, 46% to 40%.

Rasmussen

WOOF on June 14, 2006 at 01:58 pm
Avatar for Anonomisly

In any case, with this movement to unseat Lieberman, the radicals in the DNC are effectively saying that moderate Democrats are no longer welcome in their party.

yeah, Jim Webb would probably agree with you..

Anonomisly on June 14, 2006 at 03:55 pm
Avatar for Anonomisly

Yeah, but we’ve got to remember which part of the country we’re talking about. Lieberman is about as conservative as you’re going to get and still be electable in Connecticut.


That’s exactly why I believe liberal democrats (redundant?) are going after Lieberman -an ultra-liberal state like Connecticut he is as liberal, relatively, as Tom “gays-are-the-greatest-threat-to-our-freedom” Coburnis is to the nation as a whole.

Anonomisly on June 14, 2006 at 04:15 pm
Avatar for loadthemule

Lieberman, who was once known as the “conscience of the Senate” was forced to compromise some very long-held beliefs and principles to run against Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney in 2000 on the Democrat ticket with AlGore.

How do you figure he was ‘forced’?  He chose to compromise those beliefs and principles.  Which makes this make even less sense:

Lieberman is too honorable a man to be affiliated with the party of Gore, Kerry, and Howard Dean. There is plenty of room for a man with Joe Lieberman’s integrity in the GOP.

I don’t find him honorable at all.  He has situational principles and was happy to compromise them in order to run with Gore.  There’s no room for that kind of integrity in my GOP.

Regards…

loadthemule on June 14, 2006 at 09:02 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.