Libraries Ban Jon Stewart

Normally you wouldn’t think a story like the one below would inspire a lot of media coverage. Libraries ban books all the time for reasons much sillier than those described below. But since this case is about two libraries in a southern red state (and Wal-Mart) banning a book by a popular left-wing figure I can see where the liberal media would be intrigued. I can almost see the lefty readers sadly shaking their heads as they read this story and cursing the backwards population of “Jesusland.”
What media journalist isn’t interested in that?
But all that aside, this particular book ban is still pretty stupid.

GULFPORT, Miss. – Library officials in two southern Mississippi counties have banned Jon Stewart’s best-selling “America (The Book)” over the satirical textbook’s nude depictions of the nine U.S. Supreme Court justices.
“I’ve been a librarian for 40 years and this is the only book I’ve objected to so strongly that I wouldn’t allow it to circulate,” said Robert Willits, director of the Jackson-George Regional Library System of eight libraries in Jackson and George counties.
“We’re not an adult bookstore. Our entire collection is open to the entire public,” Willits said. “If they had published the book without that one picture, that one page, we’d have the book.”
Wal-Mart has declined to stock the book because of the page, which features the faces of the nine Supreme Court justices superimposed over naked bodies. The facing page has cutouts of the justices’ robes, complete with a caption asking readers to “restore their dignity by matching each justice with his or her respective robe.”

School-yard humor aside, there’s no reason why this book shouldn’t be stocked in the library. I find it hard to believe that there aren’t other books already in these libraries with content either as or more offensive then the sketch in question. If the library were truly interested in protecting minors from offensive material then perhaps they should do what most libraries in the country have done: divide their books into “Children” and “Adult” sections and limit access to the adult section to children who are accompanied by an adult.
Update:
The ban has been reversed.
Update 2:
Oliver Willis:
Signs of Sanity In Reddest America
Because finding nude renditions of Supreme Court justices a little bit objectionable is, you know”insane.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://leatherpenguin.com/wordpress/ TC_LeatherPenguin

    According to their logic, have these librarians banned any book containing, say, a photograph of Michaelangelo's "David," or similar statues, paintings, etc.?

    I'd bet not.

  • Andrew

    I have that book and I must say that it truely is very funny. Its not partisan either. It takes brutally honest shots at both sides.

    All that aside, I don't see why the library cant just remove the page in question?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    That might be a common-sense solution, Andrew, but is that really a road we want to go down? Librarians removing pages they find objectionable from books? That's not somewhere I want to go.

    Anyway, I believe they'd have to get the permission of the book's author before making a modification like that. I'm fairly certain Mr. Stewart wouldn't do it.

  • http://Array Andrew

    I'd defenitely agree that it isn't a road I'd want to go down. But I find this a bit different then other bans. It was banned for unneccessary (although quite funny) nudity. If they wanted to ban words of a book, then I'd totally agree that it is wrong. But I'm not sure nudity is the same thing.

    I'd agree with your idea to seperate the book into an adult only section, as the words alone are already vulgar and offensive enough by themselves. I just personally think that if the only reason the book would be banned was for its nudity, then it would be better to compromise then to have it banned. America has never been comfortable with nudity. We must understand that and take things in small, gradual steps rather than leaps.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    But Stewart would still have to be part of that compromise. I don't see that happening.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development