Let the Health Care Rationing Begin – A Cardiologist Speaks Out

Despite the ignorant protestations of the market illiterati of the Left, government rationing of health care services is right around the corner… the natural result of federal interference between doctors and patients. That interference is already resulting in doctors withdrawing from public, government-sponsored, health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, in favor of private pay practice, and reduced availability of medical services for those who need them most. The result, as predicted by conservatives, is fewer doctors available to treat more and more patients. More government interference, ObamaCare, means more demand for medical services and less supply to accommodate that demand… in other words, rationing.

As the health care debate continues in Washington, lost in the controversy is a little-known change in Medicare policy that threatens efficient access to lifesaving medical services for millions of heart and cancer patients.
If enacted as scheduled on Jan. 1, 2010, policy changes recommended by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) — the government’s insurer for the elderly and disabled — will severely cut current Medicare reimbursements to cardiologists and oncologists for critical care services that are provided to patients in physicians’ offices or other out-of-hospital setting, such as chemotherapy to treat cancer, and various cardiac procedures to monitor and treat heart disease, such as nuclear imaging and heart catheterization.
These cuts will force cardiologists and oncologists to limit care to their Medicare patients, withdraw from treating Medicare patients altogether or require their patients to pay more out of pocket to make up the difference in the cost of these services.

Medicare and Medicaid amount to nothing more than government price-fixing for medical/health care services. What the author, cardiologist Arie Szatkowski, is saying is that when price is fixed below the actual, profitable cost of providing those services, the service providers will choose to leave the field. The very same point made three weeks ago by my friend Donny Baseball in his open letter to Leftist Loon, Anne Lamott, here.

Unless these proposed changes are rescinded, current and future cardiac and cancer care patients will suffer the consequences, especially in rural areas where the proportion of Medicare patients is exceptionally high and patients have fewer choices of health care providers.

Notice that the Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement changes are being instituted not by legislation from Congress, but by unelected bureaucrats, the same sort of nameless lifers who now mismanage the IRS, TSA, and the Postal Service.

The changes certainly will force the closing of outreach clinics in rural areas, leaving many people without easily accessible cardiac or cancer care. They will be forced to travel to hospitals, sometimes long distances from home, and to wait for hours, if not days and weeks, for the tests and services they need…
Yet the policymakers at CMS, who base their decisions on numbers and statistics, are unilaterally and dramatically changing the delivery of heart and cancer care by proclaiming that care for heart disease and cancer is too costly, while treatment for other diseases has greater value.
… (T)he day is coming when Medicare patients — often the most vulnerable in our society — will wake up and realize they no longer have access to the timely and often urgent medical care they need.

The lesson in Dr. Szatkowski’s article is clear. In a country already being saddled with trillions in new debt by the Obama regime, there simply isn’t enough money to provide government paid health care for everyone who wants it. Nor are there enough doctors and other medical providers willing to work for government mandated wages. We cannot afford the entitlement obligations already on the books. Adding free health care for all, ObamaCare, is witless idiocy.
Let the rationing begin!

Tags:


«
»
  • ellinas

    Little e-hole continues with his litany of homo fantasies about his betters.
    robert108 on September 17, 2009 at 03:44 pm

    Thank for Admitting that idiots like you are dung flinging monkeys

  • robert108

    Only in your crackhead fantasies, lying little e-hole. Keep your sick homo fantasies to yourself and your buttboys.

  • ellinas

    Only in your crackhead fantasies, lying little e-hole. Keep your sick homo fantasies to yourself and your buttboys.
    robert108 on September 17, 2009 at 03:58 pm

    When you cast aspersions on the other person’s character, that is an attack that has nothing to do with their reasoning; it just expresses anger toward someone who disagrees with you. That is not an effective argument.

  • conundrum

    Bat as far as health care rationing , you are right , because of the AMA and the controll of how many Doctors there are we have a shortage, Now factor in the Drs. that work for for profit hospitals the influx on the not for profit will be overwhelming. Care will be slower but how much slower can it get for the people who cannot afford health insurance. I have co workers that can’t afford it, or because of salary/commission take a portion of the actual dosage of their drug to control high blood pressure?

  • conundrum

    To all as to the wages I have seen enough credit apps come through and alot of gps are making in the 175k . I am personally for lowering the cost of medical schools or having a state or the federal gov’t (yes that means you and me)forgive part of the debt by have the Doctors work in underserved areas. Wouldn’t this increase the number of people wanting to go into that field. Increased competition, lower costs , lower insurance.

  • http://www.bikebubba.blogspot.com/ Bike Bubba

    A liberal like my self would say to you: Let’s wipe out your son’s debt, reduce his work load, and tax him the same as everybody else.

    Um, Ellinas, do think about the incentives you’d get when you pay new doctors (by paying off their debt) to not work as much. Please?

    We’re hoping to extend the world’s best medical care to more and more people, and you would REDUCE the work load of doctors? Do you see a wee little problem with your plan here? Please?

    Moreover, you’re going to encourage people to go into school debt by paying off loans? Now this will do what to tuition? Hello?

    Can I suggest Hazlitt’s “Economics in one lesson”? You seriously need some help with the concepts of supply and demand, as well as economic incentives.

  • http://Array deb

    The claims above are based purely on the financial interests of specialist practitioners. They make a disproportionate high income when compared to primary care docs. That is why they are often in private practice, so they don't have to share any of their excessive profits with anyone but themselves. It is their own greed that has contributed to the unbearable rise in medical cost. Rationing healthcare has been going on for years, insurance companies do it all the time. The comments above are fear mongering.

  • http://www.bikebubba.blogspot.com/ Bike Bubba

    Deb, who would better know the costs of oncology and cardiac care than oncologists and cardiologists?

    And how would you get someone to complete 12 years of college, medical school, and residency without the ability to (ahem) pay off up to half a million dollars in student loans? If we paid cardiologists and oncologists like GPs, we are not going to get anyone to take on the extra four years of residency to do so.

    The end result; cut off profits, and people will die. For example, if the U.S. had cancer survival rates like Europe's, an extra 200,000 people would die EACH YEAR. It would be like fighting WWII, but EVERY YEAR.

    Actually, it's worse. If the profits of oncology are cut off, then you've cut off development funds to companies like Lilly and Genentech–and thus the next blockbuster products like Avastin, Erbitux, and more.

    Which means even more needless deaths, but all over the world.

  • Bat One

    The claims above are based purely on the financial interests of specialist practitioners.

    So? I wasn't aware that the loons of the Left had outlawed enlightened self-interest. Nor am I aware that doctors, regardless of their area of specialization, are obliged to put their own self-interest aside in favor of the sanctimonious dictates of some nobody named "Deb."

    There is no moral, legal, or constitutional basis for insisting that doctors participate in Medicare or Medicaid, or that they allow nameless government bureaucrats, including Obama, to dictate which patients they will treat or how much income they're allowed to make.

    The fact of the matter is that you've allowed your self-righteous ideology to constipate your thought process (not an uncommon liberal disability!). Primary care is already universally available to anyone who can crawl or be carried into an emergency room and the local hospital. And primary care doctors are rarely called upon to treat life-threatening medical conditions, such as heart disease or cancer.

    Perhaps if you were smart enough, and determined enough, you too might have become a specialist such as an oncologist or cardiologist, a neuro-surgeon or an Ob/Gyn. Then you too could be making those "excess profits" you sneer at.

    Your class warfare mentality does nothing to advance the rational discussion among adults about dealing with the issue of health care, nor is it likely to effect the medical practice decisions of those specialists you condemn so roundly.

    Pointing out the economics illiteracy of those of you on the adolescent Left isn't "fear mongering." Its called common sense.

  • conundrum

    This is how it was explained to me from someone in the medical field,. Instead of making $200,000 they will now make $180,000/ big whoop

  • SigFan

    Conundrum – While that sounds like a lot of money to you I'm sure, are you saying that you would be okay with the government forcing a 10% reduction in income on you? I'm not, for me or anyone else.

  • Bat One

    This is how it was explained to me from someone in the medical field,. Instead of making $200,000 they will now make $180,000/ big whoop

    Conundrum,

    Like Deb above, you are stupidly letting your contempt for those who earn much more than you do cloud your perception of the problem. No one has suggested that you should take pity on highly trained and highly paid medical specialists whose income will be diminished by ObamaCare rationing should they decide to continue accepting government-paid patients. The point is, if they choose not to pparticipate, as is certainly their right, the number of doctors available to treat an increased number of patients will be reduced. While demand for their service is increasing, the available supply of those services will be further reduced. Thus the rationing.

    You can argue, as some have, that rationing is already happening, instituted by the health insurance providers. But that argument is clearly stupid. ObamaCare will only exacerbate the problem of rationing, and the rationing by insurance companies referred to by the Left takes place precisely because people do not make informed buying decisions when they purchase coverage, but instead assume that the responsibility isn't their own.

  • Neiman

    Instead of making $200,000 they will now make $180,000/ big whoop

    Do you have any freaking idea how much it costs in money, years, incredibly hard work and dedication just to become a medical doctor? How much time and money is invested in on-going education just to keep those credentials? How much they must pay out of those salaries in malpractice insurance? Do you realize your life is in their hands, based on their professional care?

    After all of that, based on the value of the dollar today, I think most doctors have earned that money.

  • http://www.bikebubba.blogspot.com/ Bike Bubba

    Conundrum, even if you're right, a 10% shift in wages does influence who is willing to work in the field. You shift the demand curve, and you will affect the quantity and quality of people working in the field.

    As someone with family histories of heart disease and cancer, I object to that idea.

  • Bat One

    Incidentally, That $200,000 per year figure is horseshit too.

    The average medical malpractice insurance premium for an Ob/Gyn in Florida last year a bit less than $250,000 per year. Never mind the cost of the office, equipment, nurses, administrative staff, billing service, utilities, and the other costs for keeping a doctor's office open and running… including the elevator music and noxious magazine subscriptions.

    That's a quarter million per year, just for malpractice insurance!

  • jhm47

    Deb and Conundrum: I would encourage you to set an example for all of us. The next time you need an oncologist or a neurosurgeon, be sure to go to the one who charges the least. I know that I would be encouraged by a "cut rate" specialist, no matter what his discipline.

    BTW: My older son is now a pediatric resident. He plans to do a fellowship in neonatal cardiology of intensive care. He has over a quarter million in school loans that will need to be repaid, and he's entering a specialty field that requires 3 years of residency and 3 years of a fellowship. He works many 80 hour weeks, rarely sees his family, and is paid barely enough to survive. All this after 11 years of college (and medical school is no picnic). He will be 35 years old before he gets his first "real" job. Yes, let's cut his income, and while we're at it, let's tax the hell out of him too.

    Why don't you lieberals go to Canada. I hear the M. D.'s are paid less there. While you're waiting for healthcare, you can do some research on how bad our healthcare is here in the US.

  • deb

    From the responses to my post, it appears that no one is a primary care provider except me.
    Regarding rationing from insurance companies. For example; if I prescribe Lexapro (for example) for depression,some insurance companies won't pay for it, instead will charge the insured a higher tier cost if they want it. The will call to tell me what med in that class of drugs will be paid for on tier 1. This happens all the time with blood pressure meds, cholestrol meds, acid reflux meds. I never know which insurance company will cover what and they will change from one med to another depending on whom they buy their drugs from. This is a form of rationing, and of course cost containment.
    Regarding cardiologist not accepting Medicare patients. They then must prepare to starve. For the 65 and older patients, there is no option for health care except Medicare. (although supplemental ins may vary) Any cardiologist (whom can make >600,000/yr) who doesn't see medicare will be eliminating the bulk of their patient population. Not alot of 21 yr old having angiograms and stents. The same can be said for oncologists.
    With regard to me being from the "left", in fact I am not. I see the impact of the underinsured and the insured. I see people who have good insurance, but if you have to pay 20% of the cost of your bill and it's 100,000$ that leaves you paying 20,000! I work for a health system, they would turn their own emmployees to collection unpaid or slowly paid bills.
    Our focus should be to make our legislators make decisions that are representative of the people AND NOT THE LOBBYISTS!!!

  • Bat One

    jhm47,

    At a mere quarter million in student loans, your son got off rather well. I've known specialists with student loan balances north of twice that amount. And that doesn't include the cost of setting up a private practice.

    Best wishes to your son. This country needs more good docs.

  • http://www.bikebubba.blogspot.com/ Bike Bubba

    Deb, do you think that ordinary people don't see the shenanigans insurance companies play?

    Moreover, does it really have anything to do with this? The source for the original post simply points out that where government cuts reimbursement, providers leave the field. Already, Medicaid patients in Elkhart, IN–two hours from Chicago and about 20 minutes from South Bend–are needing to go 90 minutes for some fairly common procedures. The reality is that doctors simply can't afford to do that business in that area–which has about half a million people.

    Now think about the implications for rural North Dakota. Not pretty, is it?

    In the same way, budget pressures with providing coverage to all would squeeze Medicare–Pres. Soetoro has all but promised half a trillion dollars in cuts to Medicare if he gets his way. He wants to claim it's "waste" he's cutting, but if so, why not a bill that simply allows waste to be cut?

  • ellinas

    Deb and Conundrum: I would encourage you to set an example for all of us. The next time you need an oncologist or a neurosurgeon, be sure to go to the one who charges the least. I know that I would be encouraged by a "cut rate" specialist, no matter what his discipline.

    BTW: My older son is now a pediatric resident. He plans to do a fellowship in neonatal cardiology of intensive care. He has over a quarter million in school loans that will need to be repaid, and he's entering a specialty field that requires 3 years of residency and 3 years of a fellowship. He works many 80 hour weeks, rarely sees his family, and is paid barely enough to survive. All this after 11 years of college (and medical school is no picnic). He will be 35 years old before he gets his first "real" job. Yes, let's cut his income, and while we're at it, let's tax the hell out of him too.
    Why don't you lieberals(sic) go to Canada. I hear the M. D.‘s are paid less there. While you're waiting for healthcare, you can do some research on how bad our healthcare is here in the US.

    jhm47 on September 17, 2009 at 08:34 am

    A liberal like my self would say to you: Let's wipe out your son's debt, reduce his work load, and tax him the same as everybody else.

    Furthermore you ask: "Why don't you lieberals(sic) go to Canada".

    Well the answer to that is simple. It is the same reason you cons/neocons don't go to Bangladesh.

    Even though, there are no labor unions, the tax rates are very low, you have to pay for your own medical care, no welfare for the lazy, no Medicare, no Social Security, and no abortions allowed, I see no beeline of cons/neocons from the US to Bangladesh.
    Why is that?

  • Onslaught

    Let's wipe out your son's debt, reduce his work load, and tax him the same as everybody else.

    And Obama's going to do this when?… Exactly??

    *cough*you lie*cough*

  • ellinas

    And Obama's going to do this when?… Exactly??

    *cough*you lie*cough*
    Onslaught on September 17, 2009 at 01:51 pm

    Reread my post, and if you see Obamas name, I will let you felate me.
    It is something I am suggesting. Not Obama.

    *cough*you lie*cough*

  • Onslaught

    So not having the power to implement your plan you feel free to fling your dung anywhich way you can?

    Well, sir, that either makes you a disingenuous ass or a liar.

  • ellinas

    The same can be said about you and the other cons/neocons:

    So not having the power to implement your plan you feel free to fling your dung anywhich way you can?

    Well, sir, that either makes you a disingenuous ass or a liar.

  • Onslaught

    Thank for Admitting that liberals like you are dung flinging monkeys

  • 2keyboards

    I still see no one talking about the kind of competition that would make an insurance provider bankrupt if they tried those kinds of shenanigans. Let me buy from a national company like I buy my car insurance. Let me decide the level of coverage I need, and what I'm willing to pay for. The companies will have to compete, and service will necessarily have to improve.

    Besides, tell me when it became immoral or illegal to want to make a profit? When my husband was making more money, we were VERY generous with the excess we had. Doctors who are forced to "serve" will do so grudgingly. Doctors who are encouraged to keep their profits will do so, and then pass on free health care, free surgeries, free medical care to those that are struggling. I have seen and heard it happen too many times to discount the compassion in people of the medical field. But they first have to take care of themselves and their families. (You know. That whole "life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness" thing)

  • ellinas

    Onslaught,

    Thank you for making 2nd grade arguments.

    Reread my original post, and if you see Obamas name, I will let you felate me.
    It is something I am suggesting. Not Obama.

    *cough*you lie*cough*

  • robert108

    Little e-hole continues with his litany of homo fantasies about his betters.

  • conundrum

    nieman Jmh47 my son is a first year resident and am quite sure i KNOW how much time effort and money it takes for medical training. It was a matter of perspective. Many of his fellow students came from two physician families and were lamenting the loss of money. My son comes from a high middle income family and yeah $200,000 is alot of money. When it comes to specialist (he is heading toward internal or gp) he explains it this way do you want to have a 40 50 60 case load per day or see maybe 20 and golf on weekends and make more money by being a specialist. As a specialist I understand also <especially ob/gyn > the insurance rate is exceptionally high because of lawsuit happy people but the highest paid doctors do mean you are getting the highest care. People in my family work with surgeons some they would not trust and some are great, highly skilled and dedicated.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development