Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, September 12, 2007


Left: Petraeus Didn’t/Wouldn’t Say That Iraq Is Making Us Safer

This article from The Nation is getting picked up all over the blogosphere:

Did General David Petraeus today suggest that the war in Iraq may not make the United States safer?

During his second day of appearances on Capitol Hill, Petraeus this afternoon appeared before the Senate armed services committee. Fortified with charts and graphs, he presented the same we’re-on-the-right-course pitch he delivered to the House armed services and foreign affairs committees (on Monday) and to the Senate foreign relations committee (this morning). During the Q&A round at the armed services committee, Senator John Warner ☼, the Virginia Republican who used to chair the committee and who has called for beginning a disengagement in Iraq, took a few sharp (albeit respectful) jabs at Petraeus, noting that one intelligence report after another has said that political reconciliation in Iraq could be a bridge too far. He then asked Petraeus a pointed question: “Do you feel that [Iraq war] is making America safer”?

Petraeus paused before responding. He then said: “I believe this is indeed the best course of action to achieve our objectives in Iraq.”

That was, of course, a non-answer. And Warner wasn’t going to let the general dodge the bullet. He repeated the question: “Does the [Iraq war] make America safer?”

Petraeus replied, “I don’t know, actually. I have not sat down and sorted in my own mind.”

Don’t know? Is it possible that the war is not making the United States safer?

From the way The Nation frames Petraeus’ question-and-answer with Warner it sure sounds like he either doesn’t believe the war in Iraq has made us safer, or at least has no opinion on it.  Yet from Petraeus’ actual testimony we find this:

SEN. EVAN BAYH (D-IN): “I thought you had an excellent, very candid response to Senator Warner’s question and that was - he asked you - going forward the recommendations that you’re making, will that make America safer? And you said that you could not answer that question because that was beyond the purview of your — beyond the scope of your responsibilities.”

PETRAEUS: “Well, I thank you actually, Senator, for an opportunity to address that, frankly. Candidly, I have been so focused on Iraq that drawing all the way out was something that for a moment there was a bit of a surprise.

“But I think that we have very, very clear and very serious national interests in Iraq. Trying to achieve those interests — achieving those interests has very serious implications for our safety and for our security. So I think the answer really, to come back to it is yes. But again, frankly, having focused down and down and down, that was something that really on first glance is something that I would let others - ”

BAYH: “I judge by your response to Senator Graham, that you have given that a little additional thought.”

PETRAEUS: “Immediately afterwards actually.”

BAYH: “That happens to all of us, including those of us on this side of the table.”

Funny how General Petraeus only says things the left agrees with when they take his statements out of context.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Taking things out of context is one of my pet peeves. 

Setting that aside, I wonder what can be done to make America safer.  I do believe the war in Iraq has its place.  But what do we do while our sons and brothers and fathers are off fighting?

I just read an article in Minot Daily News where Greg Wilz (Homeland Security, I think) rated North Dakota people at about a D minus for personal preparedness in cases of disaster.  It’s got me thinking.

Gwen on September 12, 2007 at 09:58 am

This is a question that is tatamount to the old, “Do you still beat your wife, yes or no…” There is no way to answer it and not incriminate yourself.

If he says no, we’re not safer, then the Dems rear back and say “AHA!”

If he says we are and some maniac manages to blow up a bus somewhere in the U.S. then his credibility is shot and the left will waste no time in shouting it from the highest rooftops.


The future ain’t what it used to be…..

(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Pilgrim on September 12, 2007 at 10:11 am

First of all the statement made by Gen. Petraeus was not taken out of context.  Go back and listen to the tape.  Sen. Warner asked a question and then repeated the same question and that is when Gen. Petraeus answered it.

It was after a break in the testimony that Gen Petraeus when asked a question by Sen. Bayh decided to go back and clarify his answer to Sen. Warner.  So nothing was taken out of context.

The question is who spoke to the General during the break that caused him to restate his position?

Puzzlefeet on September 12, 2007 at 06:25 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.