Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, March 03, 2008

Law Enforcement Group: Private Gun Ownership Reduces Crime, Keeps People Safe

It’s almost like the founders, as well as proponents of the original intent of the 2nd amendment, have had it right all along.

When sexual assaults started rising in Orlando, Fla., in 1986, police officers noticed women were arming themselves, so they launched a firearms safety course for them. Over the next 12 months, sexual assaults plummeted by 88 percent, burglaries fell by 25 percent and not one of the 2,500 women who took the course fired a gun in a confrontation.

And that, says a new brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court by police officers and prosecutors in a controversial gun-ban dispute, is why gun ownership is important and should be available to individuals in the United States.

The arguments come in an amicus brief submitted by the Law Enforcement Alliance of America, whose spokesman, Ted Deeds, told WND there now are 92 different law enforcement voices speaking together to the Supreme Court in the Heller case.

Within the past few years Florida also instituted a “stand your ground” law which protected from prosecution those who attacked back when attacked by someone else.  It was a significant expansion of self defense and gun rights.  When the law was being considered the anti-gun zealots predicted a return to the “wild west” in Florida with gunslingers shooting up towns and foolhardy gun novices accidentally offing themselves, their loved ones and their neighbors.  That turned out to not be true at all.

In 2005, the year the “stand your ground” bill passed in Florida, there were 762,859 violent crimes in Florida.  In 2007 there were 638,256 despite an increase in the state’s population.  Was that reduction in violent crime attributable to the stand your ground bill making it easier for citizens to defend themselves?  Maybe yes, maybe no, but at the very least we can conclude that the anti-gun zealots were dead wrong in their dire predictions.

This country was founded upon the idea that power was safest when distributed “to the people.” I fail to see why the power to protect ones body, property and loved ones is any exception to that ideal.

Comments

Avatar for MostlyGenius

It is nice to see this get some attention. I have never met a rank and file police officer that thought that armed private citizens were not a good idea. Frequently the (now) leaky criminal has been arrested previously by the very same officers responding to the self-defense shooting.

Now if the Police-Politicians could get behind this concept we would really be getting somewhere.

MostlyGenius on March 3, 2008 at 07:44 am
Avatar for Chris

I have uncles who have more than 10 guns in their house at any given time.  Not once have they ever had any trouble.  Granted, there are always going to be the one that messes up by shooting their foot off, but the results show that violence is going down.  How can the politicians say no to this?  It’s like the Dems saying that Gen. Petraeus’ surge isn’t working.  It’s about time Americans opened their eyes and stopped being blind sheep.

Chris on March 3, 2008 at 08:39 am
Avatar for Tuna

Whether you like it or not, the only thing that keeps the thugs from breaking down your door, beating your wife, raping you and stealing your stuff is the fact that they think you might have a gun.  If they know you don’t have one, they will come a knockin’--more often than they aleady do.

The same people who want to take away your gun, are the ones who are upset becuase we put people in jail.  It figures.

Tuna on March 3, 2008 at 08:42 am

The 20 year research study on guns and less crime was published over five years ago.  The only difference here is that a law enforcement group seems to validate that study and support individuals defending themselves with personal firearms.
South Carolina has a similar protective law called castle defense.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on March 3, 2008 at 10:27 am

anyone notice how none of the candidates this year are talking about gun control. That in it self should scare conservatives.


Check out:
Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck
Goon’s World

goon on March 3, 2008 at 10:48 am

That in it self should scare conservatives.

Why? They can’t sell the anti-gun idea right now.

We are gaining ground:

likwidshoe on March 3, 2008 at 11:03 am

What shameless poppycock! Next they will attempt to tell us that the Sun rises in the east, or that water is wet. Oh, the shame of it all.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on March 3, 2008 at 11:16 am
Avatar for FlyOnTheWall

My thoughts on quelling violence in Afghanistan and most of the middle east was airdropping 22 pistols, rifles and shotguns and training the women to use them.  Yep, a gun under every burkha. 
A couple episodes of a group of guys bringing stones to a gunfight might change the metaphorical landscape. 

(I like 22s, no dissing.)

FlyOnTheWall on March 3, 2008 at 11:25 am

My favorite gun is a 22 as well.  A “G22 Glock” in 40 cal. for those days I’m not carrying my “G27.”

The LEAA has always been a pro-gun group, they just don’t get as much press as other organizations do.


Insert (clever) signature here:

C. Y. on March 3, 2008 at 08:13 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.