Has Barack Obama EVER been asked any of these questions? Joe Biden? No?

Ok, just to be clear…

What was that, Zsa Zsa?

Sorry about the computer malfunction…

Well, to you Obama’s answers may have been spin, but at least he gave detailed answers that show that he understood the question

Actually what go to me is that O’Riely allowed Obama to get away with saying that William Ayers did bad things long ago, but now is an upstanding citizen.

Ayers is an upstanding citizen who wipes his feet on the American Flag, ishes he’d committed more radical acts in the 70s, and indoctrinates school kids in communism.

O’Rieley should have pointed that out.

richNJ. You are spot on. With a 100-1 political (money) contribution lead in favor of Democrats to Republicans, is it any wonder there is bias in the old media?
Bear. Yes indeed. It is called pre-selection. In the federal government as well as state and come counties it is also called affirmative action, or hire the incompetent based on skin complexion.

Mickey, you keep repeating that to yourself. If you do that enough, it will become a catchy chant. Before you know that, you have a mantra. Look up some freaking FACTS before you post. Geez.

Here, I got something for ya.

Be patient

here it comes

A CLUE

Rob thinks he’s a smart guy.

Right. I’m going to believe that the guy who thinks “camp” and “campaign” are synonyms

Explain how they are different and then why FoxNews, Politico, ABC, Huff-po, Wall St. Journal, Forbes, CBS and others use it synonymously.

Haha.

Often times when you want to hire a specific person, but are forced to open the position for application, the trick is to make the requirements so specific that only the person you originally wanted is hired. You see this in city and county hiring all the time.

The media is trying to do the same thing here. Setting the ability to rattle off case law as a requirement for the job serves to make the ticket with more lawyers appear more qualified.

This is a completely false set of qualification since the job of president is an administrative one, and lawyers usually don’t administer

I don’t get it. Biden and Obama can spout off facts and their idiots when it comes to common sense questions. Like Biden having FDR on television in what year. 1929 I think. Or Obama wanting to talk to Hugo Chavez and call him on his support of FARC. Then the next day saying we as a nation should never talk to someone who supports FARC. Here is the link to Obama’s comments which were mostly ignored by the MSM. http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/05/what-the-farc-w.html
The rest of what is said by the nutcases on this site is just the usual static you hear between radio channels as you try to get something of intelligence to listen to.

Actually, the double standard used against Palin by the leftest media is obvious to anyone who can see pass their liberal nose.

Palin shouldn’t give these Obama puppets and worshippers the time of day, much less interviews. If I fault her for anything, it’s that she laid herself open to the political pawns of the liberal left who are so biased they are on equal par with rags, like the Enquirer. They have no legitimacy as a qualified News source…and I hope in the future she will treat them like the gutter rags they are.

Their “gotcha” questions, don’t have anything to do with the ability to have the judgment, experience and common sense to run this nation, which she has in spades!

It would not make one bit of difference if Palin recited all the rulings verbatim one by one they would find a way to spin it against her, no matter what she says or does it is bad no matter what she did it was bad , the news media has violated a public trust in not vetting Obama, he has been given the golden ticket and is not under any pressure at all from the MSM . Bias is rampant in this election and it is so apparent a child can see it .

Sarah Palin is facing he double standards of the left. They would never nail Hillary with such a question nor would they do it to Joe Biden and/or barry O. I seriously doubt any one of them would be able to answer the question either. But turn around is fair play, so lets have Obama and Biden on Fox and we’ll ask them some equally worthless questions.

CBS didn’t fall so far in the news ratings for a reason and Couric is hardly a journalist to be taken seriously.

It’s not the real Sarah Palin that matters. It’s the one that is in Rob’s imagination and the conservatives worshipping videos that really matter.

See for yourself.

Didn’t we have a lot of legal experts running Fannie Mae?

How did that work out?

I’m looking forward to the debate on thursday. By leftwing standards, Barry and Joe are the bimbos.

welder, judging by what you Republican Bozos have done to the economy, none of us are going to be laughing any time soon.

Much ado about almost nothing. The Dems show their desperation by focusing on this.

I’m confident that the lefty posters here know almost nothing about any Supreme Court decisions.

It’s is more important at this point that Palin knows how to get reform done than that she readily recites what the SCOTUS has done.

Palin may not appear as ready as Biden based solely on the number of facts memorized, but she is far more prepared based on her willingness and ability to do what few in Washington have the strength and determination to do… reform that sewer.

Palin’s stength and appeal as a candidate is not that she is a typical Washington politician who can craftily recite talking points on cue. She is an every day American we all relate to with the fight to serve us well in Washington.

All Sarah needs to do is be Sarah and make no apologies for who she is. That’s what we love about her.

Anytime a judge finds a word in the constitution that our Founding Fathers didn’t put there, it’s judicial activism. Like the word privacy.

And using case law to defend a principle is stupid. The way our courts work, once the Supreme court rules, that’s the law. Any case law will just build on the original ruling, even if that ruling totally circumvents the constitution. Lots of case law clearly ignores the constitution and laws. The recent ruling in favor of Guantanimo detainees was unconstitutional and illegal. Congress has the ability to limit what the court can hear. And Congress said the courts can’t hear Guantanimo cases. Yet they did anyway.

You won’t learn any of that by reading case law. Case law is important, but a lot of law students don’t read the actual LAWS anymore.

If Palin says that Roe v. Wade was judicial acitivism, she had better be ready to back that assertion with caselaw.

Anytime a judge finds a word in the constitution that our Founding Fathers didn’t put there, it’s judicial activism. Like the word privacy.

I’m all for privacy by the way.

But why does privacy from the government apply more to a woman’s body than it does to my pay check.

…or something along those lines in one of those second tear (sic) schools Sarah could not even spell the name of.

This is just what we need, a liberal lecturing us about spelling.

Noone expects her to run off facts like a Brittanica, but one would hope that someone who aspires to one of the highest office in the land would be able to say, you know, one or two coherent things about the country’s justice system. We already know she knows nothing about the economy, foreign affairs or domestic issues other than “hate the gays and ladies who were raped by their uncles”. Strike three?

That’s moronic. She hates gays and ladies raped by their uncles? Have anything to back that up? Of course not. You’re just a stupid leftist who can’t imagine Republicans “not hatin on them thar queers”. Considering she has a history of sympathy to gay issues, a weak (at best) record on abortion, and simply did what her police chief suggested on the budget.

I’m pretty sure that’s not the only thing that this tells us Robert. Robert, you were one of those guys that beat up the smart kids for ruining the curve for you, weren’t you? People become schooled in an area to perform in that area. People go to law school to be lawyers and judges. People go to trade school to become master plumbers and mechanics. People go to Med school to be doctors. People get their teaching certificates to teach. People become schooled in American history, politics and lawmaking when they want to become American politicians and lawmakers. Frankly, I don’t want a “real person” (I assume from context that you mean “who isn’t educated in her field”) doing anything she isn’t qualified to do. Just like I don’t want the guy who put in my wood floor, writing SCOTUS opinions. You understand how this works right? Any argument otherwise is farcical.

It is a tad disconcerting. But a little frank honesty, being able to rattle off case names doesn’t mean you understand the cases, and knowing the cases doesn’t mean you remember the names.

What this is, is that Palin is terrible in interviews. She stumbles a lot, stutters, and sounds generally like Obama. But, unlike Obama, even at her worst, she still gets the point across, except (apparently) on this question.

Here is where Robert turns to his canned answer “but, but, but…Obama isn’t qualified either” in the hopes of making me look hypocritical. And I, like the logical members of the discussion, will dismiss him.

I think it’s silly to compare Palin to Obama. Obama is running for President, Palin is McCain’s running mate, who will sit on her butt for 4 years unless something happens to McCain. Yet, the left is making the comparison…and Obama doesn’t match up to the opposition’s running mate. And we’re not supposed to consider this? Lame.

No, as far as Sarah Palin is concerned, it is more important that she can SAY the word reform. Because that is as much as she knows about it.

Bunk. She actually did reform in Alaska.

It is not that Palin was “caught off guard”. That is the most dishonest misrepresentation of what actually occurred it is scary.
Sarah Palin NEVER answers ANY question with specific detail. She merely blurts buzzwords like; Multi-faceted solutions, Mavrick, bi-partisanship, reform…blah, blah, blah….no specific “solution” is ever mentioned, no specifics ever.

That’s EXACTLY what happened. She didn’t expect the question. Does it reflect poorly on her? Well, yea. Duh. Does it happen to everyone. Yea.
Palin never offers answers huh? Just says buzzwords? Sounds like someone else running for President. Nevertheless, it’s a lie.

Palin has said whether or not Global Warming is real is irrelevant to the debate of whether or not we should cut back on pollution (I’m assuming she means CO2). It’s the wrong answer. But it’s an answer. She said we need to drill in ANWR. She said if NATO accepted Georgia we’d have a responsibility to help if Russia attacked.

Well, that is her narrative. She is just your average Hockey Mom, with average Hockey Mom understanding of raising kids and not knowing jack about the responsibilities of the VP or the issues. Your average Hockey mom who can bullshit with you and make personality her number one asset.

As I’ve shown before, that’s not her narrative at all. Yet you continue to dishonestly repeat it as if you’d never been shot down.

All of your talking points against Palin are lies or sound like ours against Obama.

Hey, speaking of bimbos, did you crazy kids catch the one where Sarah saw humans walking side by side with the dinosaurs? Check this out:

Because one dude said so? No one collaborates it? How childish.

Hey, did you notice in this how they debunked Jay’s tripe about Sarah hating “them thar queers” and also debunked her “strong stand on abortion”? Of course not….

Kenny continues to sparkle:
“Because one dude said so? No one collaborates it”

No, because as two dudes say it, it becomes a leftist media conspiracy. I think I’ve heard that somewhere before. But, no worries, soon THE BIMBO will open her mouth again and we shall see the dinosaurs come out. You won’t believe it, of course. But this is not about you. It’s about Proof. (that’s pretty funny – you can use that line, just give Palinisabimbo credit). Oh, man, now you got me grinning. Don’t grind your teeth, not with the dental care being so expensive in our newly socialized…

“How childish”
Wrong epithet, Kenny. It’s anything, but childish. It might be called “unconfirmed” or “unreliable”, but childish? That’s kinda weak. Childish even. There, I said it. Calling it childish is childish. What are you, 6 years old?

once the Supreme court rules, that’s the law

Unfortunately the supremes also make law out of whole cloth (e.g. Roe v Wade). Not much that protect us from that.

Yes. And O’Reiley let Obama spin on a number of issues.

Well, to you Obama’s answers may have been spin, but at least he gave detailed answers that show that he understood the question (a challenge for Palin) and that he could answer it with specifics.

Hey, speaking of bimbos, did you crazy kids catch the one where Sarah saw humans walking side by side with the dinosaurs? Check this out:

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-palinreligion28-2008sep28,0,3643718.story?track=rss

Did you even watch the O’Rielly interview?

Yes. And O’Reiley let Obama spin on a number of issues.

Tell her about it,
tell her all your crazy dreams

Let her know you need her,
let her know how much she means

None dare challenge her
vast legal knowledge of
moose hunting from vehicles.

Cunning armed Moose are hiding behind the second
amendment , luring motorists to their doom.