More rightie spin from 108 and he even (as always) throws in a CLLLLIIIINNNTOOON. I do believe that you are in love with Bill and are having a hard time dealing with it.

Yellow cake
Aluminum tubes
Smoking gun
WMD
Mobile labs
Al Qeada connections
Welcomed as liberators
War will pay for itself
Slam dunk

Where are those WMD anyway? We know they are not north south east or west of Tikrit somewhat.

Where is Osama?

I was joking about how the GOP is changing the subject with all this Kerry crap

Which is SO unlike how the libs were changing the subject with all the Foley crap!

The difference is, that the views of John Kerry, the former Democratic Presidential nominee are far more indicative of the beliefs of the Michael Moore/MoveON.Org Democartic party than Mark Foley’s are of the Republicans.

And John Kerry’s little snapshot into the soul of the Democratic party (or lack thereof), may have bearing on which party controls the levers of power after next Tuesday’s election.

Heh,

Now this is how such a “joke” is done:

“He was for the joke before he was against it.”

Way to go, Mr. Vice President!

Out Here
Rodney Graves
rodney.g.graves@gmail.com

Not that he needs to, but he has apologized.

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/01/kerry-msnbc-apologize/

Bush started the war in Iraq -rbb

Sorry, Bob! Wrong Bush! When Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, Bush 41 responded with Desert Storm. That conflict ended with a ceasefire, the terms of which, Saddam Hussein failed to comply.

When Saddam defied the UN and its resolutions, the US, as the world’s only remaining superpower, stepped in to finish what Bush Sr. and the US had started. Finishing the war that Saddam started was key to denying safe haven to terrorists.

You’d think someone who called himself “reality based” might occasionally get his facts straight!

Ah yes, the great progressive state of Tennessee. He’s merely catering to the base there, just like when he said he favors having the 10 commandments in public buildings.

Or like this:

Given that he never said anything at all about the troops, much less insult them, he shouldn’t have to apologize for it.

On the first day of the 104th Congress, the new Republican majority will immediately pass the following major reforms, aimed at restoring the faith and trust of the American people in their government:
• FIRST, require all laws that apply to the rest of the country also apply equally to the Congress;
• SECOND, select a major, independent auditing firm to conduct a comprehensive audit of Congress for waste, fraud or abuse;
• THIRD, cut the number of House committees, and cut committee staff by one-third;
• FOURTH, limit the terms of all committee chairs;
• FIFTH, ban the casting of proxy votes in committee;
• SIXTH, require committee meetings to be open to the public;
• SEVENTH, require a three-fifths majority vote to pass a tax increase;
• EIGHTH, guarantee an honest accounting of our Federal Budget by implementing zero base-line budgeting.

How’s this coming along, gopers?

Any news about the other 10 points?

You cannot be pro-american and support this president, HG.

This President is AMERICA’s PRESIDENT, tard. America is at war, and not with our President, unlike you leftist nuts.

If you think there is

safe haven for terrorists

in Iraq now, wait until the “cut and run” Democrats have their way!

Even ‘National Guard’ who are supposed to be here ‘Guarding the Nation’ and not off in the Garden of Eden shooting the locals.

A lie of course. Did you make that up or does Kos do all your thinking for you.

rbb:

On the first day of the 104th Congress, the new Republican majority will immediately pass the following major reforms, aimed at restoring the faith and trust of the American people in their government:

Of course, you left out winning the war on terrorism, but since you are a leftie, you just don’t “get” that one. In fact, you seem to know, somewhere in the dark recesses of your “mind”, what would be good for this country. Why then do you continue to support the Marxists(Dems), who simply want to destroy this country? Intellectual dishonesty?

Not that he needs to, but he has apologized.

Kerry appologized after he got defensive and made said he did nothing wrong.

Bush is stuck in Iraq, he’s just dragging the troops down into the quagmire with him.

IF I am not mistake Kerry Voted for the war, before he was against it.

It really confuses me how Dems can really like Kerry? Kerry is the eltiest leftist jerk that we all read about. His comments about the soldiers should confuse no one, Kerry is a person that doesn’t support the troops. While he can poo-poo this and say that he is attacking Bush for being stupid Bush went to Yale and did get his business degree. I have been told got better grades than Kerry.

It turns out George W. Bush and John Kerry were mediocre students at Yale. Bush, in fact, had a slightly better average than his 2004 foe. I wonder if the “Bush is dumb” crowd, who incessantly invoke such trivia as Bush’s college transcripts, will now do the same for Kerry. I’ll settle for them ceasing to mistake modest academic achievements as an Oval Office disqualifier.

College is overrated. The almae matres of Harry Truman (never graduated from college), Lyndon Johnson (Southwest Texas Teachers College), and Richard Nixon (Whittier College) prove this. Stellar grades and a high IQ doesn’t translate into a great president. When we elect a president, we don’t necessarily look for the most intelligent or studious man. Intelligent people can be arrogant, fanatical, cowardly, and lacking in good judgment. In other words, many factors go into making a good president, intelligence being but one. Liberals forget this, insulting half of the men on national Republican tickets as stupid (Ronald Reagan, Dan Quayle, George W. Bush) and the other half–that can’t be so dismissed–as evil (Barry Goldwater, Richard Nixon, Dick Cheney). Liberals want an intellectual in chief. Americans want a commander in chief. If you don’t get this, look up President Adlai Stevenson or President Eugene McCarthy in the history books.

108 seems like y’all are doing a better job defeating us! jackass.

I guess that’s an illustration of your twisted leftie “thinking”. What part of “defeating the terrorists” don’t you understand?

FDR caused the Great Depression, dude, not Hoover. FDR’s socialist policies turned a market downturn into a depression.
The Dems want us to lose the war by cutting and running, which will embolden the terrorists to come here to kill us; the Dems want the economy to fail, and have been relentlessly downtalking it for six years, and all for partisan political gain. They want power, and don’t care if they have to destroy the country in the process. In fact, that would make it easier to turn us into a Soviet-style dictatorship, with the Dems at the top, mandating our activities.

The stupid policies you and 108 are busy boosting for.

The only policy I’m “boosting for” is the defeat of the terrorists. How about you?

The “botched joke” defense.

Anything but the Iraq war eh?

The same old leftie talking points; when you get nailed, change the subject. Brilliant!

Ahh! The “botched joke” defense. Very clever. The fact is, you are the only one who brought up skin color on this thread, which makes you a racist.

It’s worth noting that Wonkette understands exactly what Kerry said, and she noted that the proper thing to do in any crucial situation is to lock him in an (expletive deleted) closet and throw away the (expletive deleted) key. Even some left-liberals understand the ordinary implications of statements from time to time.

And for what it’s worth, Hoover also did some intervention that helped to deepen the 1929 recession into the Great Depression. He’s still a minor leaguer compared to FDR, but I’m loath to ignore his contribution here. :^)

Either way, the problem is still government action where free markets ought to be given a bit of free rein.

Yes Democrats hate America and want to see it burn! It couldn’t possibly be that they’re simply students of history. The last time in American History that conservatives held power for this long, in both the Presidential and Legislative branches of government, the U.S. suffered WW1 and mass poverty. Republicans won control of the government in 1900 when William McKinley was re-elected, continued with it after his assassination, under Teddy Roosevelt, and running into the early administration of William Taft. The party’s power took up again in 1921 under Warren G. Harding — running through the administrations of Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover ended with the Great Depression- with massive corruption and multiple scandals interspersed between. You would think we would have learned by now. History and hunger both being great teachers.

Never mind the other racist threads that litter this blog…

Why do Republicans want to keep killing American soldiers? Yeah, if they were really smart they would go after the real

That is shameful. This is the kind of crap that makes me vote GOP. I wonder if they will be able to find him if they actually are able to steal the house and senate..

No one cares anyway, he’s a dumbass.

He was the candidate for President that the free lunch bunch nominated, so you may be right. Congratulations!

I’d rather see 3000 soldiers die in three years fighting, based on a hunch, than to lose 3000 civilians in 2 hours because we did nothing. They don’t get it guys, and they will not get it. They think war can be sanitized like the movies.

They also believe that if we had put all our military into Afghanistan, that bin Laden and co. would stick around and get slaughtered. They seem to believe Abrams tanks and mechanized infantry will function in the mountains of Afghanistan…yeah, and the moon is made of green cheese too. The Democrats have spent so long disengaged from the military, that they don’t even understand its capabilities and limitations. From the way they talk, they don’t even understand that soldiers die in war.

They don’t understand that a fundamental change, in the status quo, needs to take place in the ME, and that the change will be bloody and take a long time. “If only we changed the way we act, they might like us better”, is a recipe for suicide and surrender.

You need to show strength in the face of the enemy, not cowardice. Sadly, those on the Left will never get it, because it conflicts with too many of their long held beliefs. Convincing someone on the Left, that war is bloody and hard and necessary, is like trying to convince a Christian that Jesus is not the son of God.

I’m done with my rant, time to get some sleep.

All that black gold, going unplundered by fair skinned, preferred, people? That is goddamn threatening.

Ever the racist, eh Sparkie?

Well, Democrat candidate Harold Ford Junior seems to think that Kerry needs to apologize to our troops.

I guess only sycophantic partisans like you think Kerry a) didn’t insult the troops and b) shouldn’t need to apologize for it.

John! You go stand with your nose in the corner for some quiet time.
I love it when people, “don’t say what they mean to.”
Heeheehee.

to free tens of millions of people to enjoy self-determination

Milosevic was never a threat to the region

^You are way off robert108. Way off.

Finishing the war that Saddam started was key to denying safe haven to terrorists.

Try: Finishing the war that Saddam started was key to safe haven for terrorists (because we didn’t send enough troops) and increasing terrorist recruitment.

Ever sarcastic

^this was in reference to
this:

All that black gold, going unplundered by fair skinned, preferred, people? That is goddamn threatening.

The “botched joke” defense.

Anything but the Iraq war eh?

108
seems like y’all are doing a better job defeating us! jackass.

Thanks Kevin.

And thanks realitybasedbob for the big list.

And thanks robert108 for all the humor in general.
You give Monty Python a run for their money!