Kent Conrad Sending Mixed Messages On The “Public Option”

Yesterday it was being reported here in North Dakota that Senator Conrad was refusing to comment on whether or not he’d break with his fellow liberals and vote against a health care bill with a “public option.”
This morning he was on MSNBC railing against the public option, but it’s worth noting that his opposition to the public option was somewhat qualified. He’s against tying any “public option”‘s reimbursement rates to Medicare reimbursement rates.

Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) appeared on MSNBC this morning and declared — not for the first time — that a public health insurance option tied to Medicare-levels of reimbursement would be bad for states like his. Not just bad — but “a disaster,” Conrad said.
That’s because North Dakota has the country’s second-lowest Medicare reimbursement level, Conrad said.
“My state would be very adversely affected by public option tied to Medicare-levels of reimbursement,” he said. “That’s great for New York, California, Flordia. It’s very bad for low-reimbursement states like mine.”
The answer, Conrad said, (again not for the first time), is “a cooperative plan” and not a “government-run plan.”

So what gives?
Conrad, who isn’t dumb, knows that any “public option” or “cooperative plan” (they’re basically the same thing despite Conrad’s hair splitting) that had to reimburse doctors based on Medicare rates wouldn’t be competitive with private insurers. Because Medicare rates, though they vary from state to state, generally undercut the market prices for care significantly. In some instances Medicare only reimburses doctors and hospitals at 60% of the actual market value of their services.
That’s possible with Medicare, which isn’t optional for Americans given that we’re all forced to pay into it, but any government-backed plan be it cooperative or not isn’t going to get a lot of support.
Unless the government plans on forcing people onto those plans like they’re forced onto Medicare. Which, believe me, is part of the eventual plan.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • sayanything-279

    Move.On is sponsering radio spots in support of Conrad for working for the best interests of ND citizens. If that is true why did he vote against the amendment offered in his committee to guarantee that you could keep your insurance?

  • sayanything-3444

    Call me a conspiracy nut if you like – I'm sure there some here that will, but it almost seems as though this is a tactic being used by the Democrats. Keep people guessing, unsure of what's in or out of the bill, unsure how their reps and senators are going to vote, right up until the actual vote. That way they can minimize the heat they take from their constituencies and pretty much absolve themselves later by saying that they fought right to the end to get he "best bill" possible. Just seems to be a common pattern of behavior right now.

  • http://Array sayanything-4124

    Some other group is running ads, really quick ads, with a senior on a porch begging him to not cut her Medicare. Wonder who will squeeze him the hardest..lol

    I noticed he has done that subtle change of language that politicians do so well. Moving from being firm w/o no equivocation, to just a smidge of a change in wording to give "cover"

    I don't agree with alot of the views of Ron Paul and Dennis Kuchninch(sp?), but I think I respect them more than an other weasel in Congress because both continue to stick b their beliefs w/o wavering, whether it is popular or not.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development